The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 59 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Criton shines .
Runtriz shines when it comes to guest communication , with exclusive features like Web-app and Automatic Translations (Multi-Lingual).
Side-by-side ratings based on 59 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 21 | 38 |
After analyzing 59 verified reviews, Criton users most value its , while Runtriz users highlight guest communication, user experience, check-in process. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Guest Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
User Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Check-in Process
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Generation
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customizability
▾
|
|
|
−
Guest Misunderstanding
▾
|
|
|
−
Notification and Alerts
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Guest Apps vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #5 14 reviews | #13 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #15 4 reviews | #3 33 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #14 2 reviews | #12 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #25 0 reviews | #24 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #14 7 reviews | #9 11 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #13 10 reviews | #15 3 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #15 3 reviews | #2 34 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #9 3 reviews | #2 24 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #10 2 reviews | #1 37 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #11 18 reviews | #34 0 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #19 0 reviews | — |
Choosing between Criton and Runtriz for your hotel’s guest engagement app depends on your specific operational needs and strategic priorities. Both platforms aim to improve guest communication, streamline operations, and boost revenue, but they diverge in features, market focus, and user experience. Criton emphasizes deep customization, content management, and a broader global reach, while Runtriz offers a scalable, multi-functional platform with strong pre-arrival and post-stay communication. Which aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
Criton and Runtriz both serve as mobile guest engagement platforms designed to digitize hotel guest services. Criton’s strengths lie in its ability to create a branded, all-in-one app that replaces printed materials, supports contactless experiences, and offers extensive customization. Runtriz, on the other hand, provides a versatile suite of features catering to a wide range of property types, with particular emphasis on pre-arrival communication, digital check-in, and multi-lingual support.
Criton boasts a higher overall rating of 4.71/5 with 21 reviews, but Runtriz’s score of 4.77/5 with 37 reviews and more recent feedback gives it a slight edge in current user sentiment. Criton is particularly popular among boutique and independent hotels, while Runtriz’s clientele spans from luxury to budget hotels, resorts, casinos, and conference properties. Both platforms aim to enhance guest experience and operational efficiency, but Criton’s focus on content flexibility contrasts with Runtriz’s broader feature set including integrations and multilingual capabilities.
Are you seeking a highly customizable app that you can tailor to your brand, or a more comprehensive platform with wider integrations and functionalities? Your choice hinges on whether branding and content control or extensive operational features are your top priorities.
If your hotel needs a flexible, easy-to-update guest app that replaces printed materials and emphasizes branding, Criton is the better fit. It’s ideal for boutique, independent, or small to mid-sized hotels that want to control their content and deliver a contactless, personalized experience. Criton’s strong analytics and content management tools support ongoing improvements in guest engagement.
Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes features like pre-arrival communication, digital check-in, multilingual support, and seamless integration with other systems, Runtriz is preferable. Its scalable platform suits large operations, resorts, and properties with complex needs, especially those seeking to enhance operational efficiency through automation and real-time messaging.
In summary, choose Criton for customization, content flexibility, and branding, and Runtriz for operational breadth, integration, and multi-property management.
Criton’s user interface is rated 4.5/5, with reviewers describing it as user-friendly and straightforward, especially for front-end guests and back-end content management. Its onboarding process is rated 4.36/5, with many praising the ease of creating and updating content, though some mention limited templates.
Runtriz scores slightly higher at 4.66/5 for ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its simple, intuitive application and quick implementation. Users find the platform’s messaging and pre-arrival features easy to navigate, although some note that its interface could benefit from a more modern look. Both platforms are designed for staff adoption, but Criton’s focus on customization may require slightly more initial training.
Edge: Runtriz.
Criton offers a suite of 10 shared features, including mobile check-in, digital door keys, in-room messaging, push notifications, and content updates—plus the ability to replace printed materials entirely. It lacks features like multilingual support and in-app payments, which are present in Runtriz.
Runtriz provides 12 features, including all shared ones, plus unique additions such as a web app and automatic multilingual translations. It supports mobile pay, in-room controls, F&B solutions, and loyalty integration, making it a more comprehensive operational tool.
While Criton excels in content flexibility, Runtriz’s broader feature set and multilingual support give it the edge for hotels seeking versatile, multi-functional guest engagement.
Edge: Runtriz.
Criton’s reviews highlight a customer support team rated 4.62/5, praised for quick, responsive service and supportive onboarding. Users frequently mention the support team’s proactive approach and helpfulness, especially during platform updates and feature requests.
Runtriz’s support is rated slightly lower at 4.51/5, with reviews noting ease of implementation and ongoing assistance, though some users report issues with notification reliability and integration challenges. Criton’s more recent reviews reflect ongoing satisfaction, suggesting consistent quality.
Edge: Criton.
Criton connects with 16 verified partners, including major PMS, POS, and revenue management systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Maestro PMS. It supports integrations with Benbria, Net Affinity, and GuestRevu, enabling advanced guest feedback and marketing.
Runtriz integrates with 14 verified partners, including Oracle, Cendyn, and Infor. It also offers integrations with systems like SALTO, OpenKey, and Onity, along with its own in-house features such as loyalty and F&B management.
Both platforms boast extensive integrations, but Criton’s slightly larger partner network and focus on custom integrations make it the preferable choice for hotels requiring flexible connectivity.
Edge: Criton.
Runtriz enjoys a higher average rating of 4.77/5 from 37 reviews, with many properties praising its ease of use, extensive features, and positive impact on guest communication. Recent reviews reinforce its reliability and scalability across property types.
Criton holds a solid 4.71/5 from 21 reviews, especially appreciated for customization, content management, and customer support. Its boutique and independent hotel users particularly value its flexibility.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, Runtriz’s slightly higher rating indicates stronger current user satisfaction.
Edge: Runtriz.
Both Criton and Runtriz do not publish fixed pricing publicly, indicating a tailored, quote-based model. Neither platform offers a freemium or trial option, which may require hotels to commit upfront for implementation.
Your hotel should expect pricing to depend on the number of rooms, features selected, and integration complexity. For precise cost comparisons, direct engagement with sales teams is necessary.
Not ideal if your hotel needs complex operational features or multilingual in-app communications.
Not ideal if your hotel mainly needs a simple, content-driven guest app without operational automation.
Criton and Runtriz both aim to improve guest engagement and operational efficiency, but they serve slightly different needs. Criton’s emphasis on content control, branding, and customization makes it ideal for boutique and independent hotels that want to craft a unique digital guest journey. Runtriz’s broad feature set, integration capabilities, and scalability fit larger properties and multi-property operators seeking operational automation and seamless communication.
If your hotel values flexible content management and a personalized experience, Criton offers the edge with a more tailored approach. For properties that need a comprehensive, multifunctional guest engagement platform with strong operational tools, Runtriz is the better choice. Ultimately, your decision should align with your hotel’s strategic focus: branding and guest experience versus operational efficiency and scalability.
Ranks higher for
What hoteliers love
Runtriz is praised for its ability to facilitate easy and efficient communication between hotel staff and guests. It supports pre-arrival notification... Runtriz is praised for its ability to facilitate easy and efficient communication between hotel staff and guests. It supports pre-arrival notifications, real-time messaging, and service requests, which improves guest satisfaction and operational efficiency.
The platform is generally considered user-friendly and straightforward for both staff and guests. However, some users noted that the interface could b... The platform is generally considered user-friendly and straightforward for both staff and guests. However, some users noted that the interface could be more modern and visually appealing, suggesting potential areas for aesthetic improvements.
The tool streamlines and expedites check-in with features like mobile pre-check-in and real-time notifications, reducing wait times and enhancing the... The tool streamlines and expedites check-in with features like mobile pre-check-in and real-time notifications, reducing wait times and enhancing the guest experience. However, some issues with proper integration and guest understanding of pre-check-in were noted.
Where hoteliers push back
Runtriz allows a high degree of customization in setting templates and automating responses, which users found beneficial for streamlining operations... Runtriz allows a high degree of customization in setting templates and automating responses, which users found beneficial for streamlining operations and enhancing guest interaction. However, improvement in backend support for these features was suggested.
Some guests misunderstand the pre-check-in process, thinking it means they are fully checked in, leading to confusion and dissatisfaction. Clearer com... Some guests misunderstand the pre-check-in process, thinking it means they are fully checked in, leading to confusion and dissatisfaction. Clearer communication and instructions could mitigate these issues.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. Criton and Runtriz share many core Hotel Guest Apps features, but each has unique capabilities. Criton offers 16 verified integration partners, while Runtriz offers 14. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Runtriz leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Criton: No. Runtriz: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Guest Apps vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Criton has an HT Score of 0 and Runtriz has 21. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor