The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,242 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cloudbeds shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
dihotel shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,242 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 1,242 | 0 |
After analyzing 1,242 verified reviews, Cloudbeds users most value its user-friendly interface, implementation and support, all-in-one ecosystem, while dihotel users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
dihotel |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-One Ecosystem
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
dihotel |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #1 592 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #4 212 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #5 42 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #13 4 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
dihotel |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 473 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 228 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #6 116 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #2 93 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
dihotel |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 435 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #7 163 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #3 226 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 11 reviews | — |
As a hotelier evaluating property management systems, your primary goal is to find a platform that enhances operational efficiency, improves guest satisfaction, and drives revenue. Cloudbeds PMS by Cloudbeds and dihotel both aim to streamline your daily tasks, but they diverge significantly in maturity, feature depth, and market presence. Cloudbeds, with its extensive reviews, recent updates, and proven track record, stands out as the more reliable and comprehensive choice. The question remains: which platform best aligns with your hotel’s size, needs, and growth ambitions?
Cloudbeds and dihotel are designed to handle core hotel operations—from reservations and housekeeping to billing and reporting. Cloudbeds, with over 1,071 reviews and a 4.63/5 overall rating, offers a broad feature set and a global presence, making it trusted by thousands of properties. dihotel, on the other hand, has no reviews and a 0/5 rating, indicating a lack of market traction and user feedback, which diminishes confidence in its reliability.
While Cloudbeds provides a robust, fully integrated PMS with over 64 exclusive features, dihotel’s offerings appear limited and untested in the broader market. If your hotel relies on proven, scalable solutions, Cloudbeds clearly has the edge. Are you comfortable choosing a platform with a proven track record, or are you willing to risk untested software?
If your hotel needs a mature, scalable system with proven support and extensive features, go with Cloudbeds. It’s well-suited for diverse property segments, from boutique hotels and hostels to larger resorts, with a strong focus on revenue management, channel distribution, and guest communication.
If your hotel is a small, niche operation with minimal needs and perhaps a preference for a lower-cost, less tested system, dihotel might seem appealing—though its lack of reviews and market presence make this risky. Given Cloudbeds’ extensive user base and recent positive reviews, it’s the clear choice for hotels seeking reliability and growth.
In essence, choose Cloudbeds if your priority is stability, features, and vendor support. Consider dihotel only if you’re prepared to gamble on an unverified platform with no market validation.
Cloudbeds boasts a user-friendly interface rated 4.61/5, praised for its intuitive navigation and ease of onboarding. It offers comprehensive onboarding support, with a 4.45/5 satisfaction score, and a well-designed mobile app that staff find accessible for daily operations.
dihotel, with no reviews or ratings available, provides no data on usability or user experience. Its lack of market presence and feedback suggests it’s untested, unlikely to match Cloudbeds’ ease of use.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers over 64 unique features, including a channel manager, integrated revenue management, online check-in, guest messaging, and advanced reporting tools—many of which are absent in dihotel. Cloudbeds’ features are designed for scalability, automation, and detailed analytics, supporting various property types and sizes.
dihotel’s feature set is not detailed or extensive, and it provides no information on specific capabilities. Its lack of market presence and feature depth makes it an inferior choice for hotels seeking comprehensive, customizable management solutions.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ support team is rated 4.41/5, with reviews highlighting prompt, empathetic assistance that helps resolve issues swiftly. Its extensive onboarding resources, customer service channels, and active community foster a positive user experience.
dihotel, with no review data or support ratings available, offers no reassurance on support quality or responsiveness. A system without proven support is risky if your operations depend on timely assistance.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds integrates with over 190 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment processors, channel managers, and third-party apps. Its open API allows for extensive customization and automation, minimizing manual work and errors.
dihotel has zero verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other systems or third-party tools. This lack of connectivity restricts operational flexibility and scalability.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ reviews, with over 81 recent comments, are predominantly positive across all segments, notably boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties. Its average rating of 4.63/5 and a likelihood to recommend score of 91% reflect high user satisfaction.
dihotel, with no reviews or recent user feedback, cannot be rated or compared meaningfully. Without validation from actual users, its perceived value remains unproven.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a base price of $600/month, with no free tier or trial info publicly available. Its pricing reflects its comprehensive feature set and support.
dihotel’s pricing model is not disclosed, and with no market presence, it’s unclear whether it offers affordability or value. The lack of transparent pricing further diminishes confidence.
Overall, Cloudbeds provides a clear, predictable investment.
The core difference is that Cloudbeds is a mature, feature-rich system with proven support, extensive integrations, and a large user base. It streamlines operations from booking to billing, supports growth, and is trusted worldwide.
Choose Cloudbeds if your hotel needs a reliable, scalable, and well-supported PMS with proven reviews, recent updates, and comprehensive features. Its ease of use, support, and global presence make it ideal for hoteliers committed to growth and operational excellence.
Opt for dihotel only if your hotel’s requirements are minimal, you’re willing to take a risk on unproven software, and budget constraints are your primary concern. Given its lack of reviews and features, it’s unlikely to meet the needs of most hotels seeking stability and growth.
In conclusion, Cloudbeds’ strong review profile, market presence, and feature depth make it the superior choice for hotels aiming to modernize, expand, and deliver exceptional guest experiences.
According to HTR's product database, Cloudbeds PMS and dihotel share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
dihotel |
|---|---|---|
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| PMS connectivity |
Showing top differences. 52 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training.... Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training. This ease of use is particularly beneficial for daily operations such as managing reservations and performing check-in/check-out processes.
Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsivenes... Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsiveness and assistance, complete feature parity on mobile and integration capabilities require more comprehensive support for a smoother transition.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multip... Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multiple systems, minimizing manual work and synchronizing operations in real time.
Where hoteliers push back
Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administra... Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administrative load, errors, and improves overall operational productivity. The system's drag-and-drop functionality is highlighted as particularly useful.
While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be va... While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be valuable for strategic decisions. This is a recurring theme among those seeking deeper analytics and visualization.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cloudbeds PMS and dihotel share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Cloudbeds PMS offers 189 verified integration partners, while dihotel offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cloudbeds PMS: No. dihotel: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cloudbeds has an HT Score of 100 and dihotel has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor