The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 34 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
dihotel shines .
Shiji Group shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 34 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 34 |
After analyzing 34 verified reviews, dihotel users most value its , while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| dihotel |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | dihotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #53 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #11 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | dihotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #33 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #24 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #22 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #45 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | dihotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #33 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #30 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #14 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #5 14 reviews |
Choosing between dihotel by dihotel and Shiji Daylight PMS hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, budget, and growth plans. Both aim to streamline hotel management, but their approaches, features, and user bases vary dramatically. dihotel claims to offer a comprehensive PMS, yet it has no recent reviews or ratings, raising questions about its current viability. In contrast, Shiji Daylight PMS boasts a robust presence with 32 reviews in the last six months, a high NPS score, and significantly stronger user feedback. Which one truly aligns with your hotel’s ambitions?
Dihotel positions itself as an all-encompassing property management tool, promising centralization of operations from reservations to billing. However, with zero reviews in recent months and a zero-star rating, its performance and user satisfaction remain unverified. Shiji Daylight PMS, on the other hand, enjoys a 74.69/100 HT score, 32 reviews, and a 90% likelihood to recommend, indicating a more tested and trusted solution. Are you confident investing in a system with no recent validation, or do proven user experiences guide your choice?
If your hotel requires a reliable, scalable, and well-supported PMS with extensive features, go with Shiji Daylight PMS. It’s better suited for hotels seeking detailed analytics, seamless integrations, and a user-friendly interface backed by strong customer support. If your hotel’s needs are minimal, limited to basic reservation management without the need for advanced tools, dihotel might be considered, but the lack of current reviews makes this a risky proposition. For growth and operational consistency, Shiji is the safer bet.
Shiji Daylight PMS receives a 4.63/5 ease of use rating, with users praising its intuitive interface, onboarding process, and straightforward navigation. Conversely, dihotel has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. Given the available data, it’s clear that Shiji’s interface and support materials make it accessible for staff at all levels. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Group boasts 98 features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, payment processing, and mobile apps—many of which are absent from dihotel. dihotel offers no verified features or unique tools, limiting its appeal. If advanced functionalities, automation, and integrations are priorities, Shiji clearly outperforms dihotel. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Group’s support scores a 4.53/5, with reviews highlighting its responsiveness, helpfulness, and comprehensive training materials. Reviewers describe the support team as professional and proactive, aiding in smooth implementation and daily operations. dihotel lacks recent customer feedback, making it impossible to gauge support quality. Based on available data, Shiji’s support system is superior. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64 verified integrations, including popular partners like SiteMinder, Revinate, and Amadeus. It also supports booking engines, payment systems, and EPoS, creating a connected ecosystem. dihotel has zero verified integrations, limiting its operational flexibility. For hotels looking to connect multiple systems effortlessly, Shiji is the clear choice. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
With 32 recent reviews, Shiji Daylight PMS has an overall positive outlook, especially among luxury, branded, and conference hotels. Hotels in these segments rate it highly for usability and support. dihotel, with no recent reviews, cannot be rated or trusted at this point. For current user satisfaction, Shiji’s reviews provide the necessary confidence. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
dihotel’s pricing details are unavailable, and it offers no trial or freemium options, making budgeting and comparison difficult. Shiji Daylight PMS costs $1,200 per month as a base price, with no mention of implementation fees or discounts. Given the lack of transparent pricing for dihotel, Shiji provides a clear, predictable cost structure suitable for budgeting.
The core difference lies in the maturity, usability, and feature set. Shiji Daylight PMS has a proven track record, with robust user feedback, extensive integrations, and a scalable platform that suits a wide range of hotel types. dihotel appears to lack recent validation, reviews, and features, making it a risky choice for hotels wanting reliable, modern management software.
If your hotel values proven performance, comprehensive features, and strong support, go with Shiji Daylight PMS. Its extensive integrations, user-friendly interface, and positive reviews support faster onboarding and better operational control. The fact that it has an active user base and recent reviews makes it the safer, more effective choice.
However, if your hotel’s needs are extremely basic, and budget constraints prohibit investment in a scalable solution, dihotel could suffice—though its current lack of validation makes this a gamble. For most hotels aiming for operational excellence and guest satisfaction, Shiji Daylight PMS is the clear leader.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| dihotel |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, dihotel and Shiji Daylight PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | dihotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 86 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. dihotel and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. dihotel offers 0 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Daylight PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
dihotel: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. dihotel has an HT Score of 0 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor