The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 34 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
easyGuestmanagement shines .
Shiji Group shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 34 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 34 |
After analyzing 34 verified reviews, easyGuestmanagement users most value its , while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #53 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #11 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #33 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #24 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #22 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #45 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #33 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #30 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #14 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #5 14 reviews |
Choosing between easyGuestmanagement GmbH’s platform and Shiji Group’s Daylight PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and growth plans. Both aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in features, market presence, and user feedback. easyGuestmanagement offers a minimal, less proven solution, while Shiji Group’s platform boasts extensive features, a robust global footprint, and a large, recent review base. Are you ready to prioritize proven scalability and comprehensive support over simplicity?
easyGuestmanagement is a basic platform with zero reviews and no recent data, making its reliability and usability unverified. In contrast, Shiji Daylight PMS has a comprehensive set of 32 recent reviews, with a high 8.94/10 NPS score and a 4.63/5 ease of use rating—indicating strong user satisfaction. The limited visibility into easyGuestmanagement’s features and support means you’re essentially choosing an untested solution versus a widely adopted, trusted platform. Do you prefer investing in a proven system or trying a less-established one?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, scalable PMS with extensive support and integrations, go with Shiji Daylight PMS. Its 98 unique features—including guest profiles, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, and automation tools—serve large or growing hotels well. If simplicity and minimal operational scope suffice, and you’re willing to accept the risk of limited support, easyGuestmanagement’s basic offering might suffice. However, given the lack of recent reviews and a weak online presence, Shiji is the safer, more future-proof choice.
Shiji Daylight PMS consistently scores 4.63/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, comprehensive training materials, and straightforward onboarding processes. Users appreciate how easily new staff can learn the system and perform daily tasks. Conversely, easyGuestmanagement has a 0/5 usability rating, with no recent reviews to confirm its user experience. Its lack of user feedback makes it impossible to assess, but the high-rated, user-friendly design of Shiji suggests a clear advantage. Edge: Shiji Group.
Shiji Group’s platform offers 98 features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, mobile apps, automation, and more—features that easyGuestmanagement lacks entirely. This extensive feature set enables detailed guest management, operational automation, and multi-property control, making it suitable for larger or complex hotel operations. easyGuestmanagement’s limited or unspecified features make it less adaptable for comprehensive hotel management. Edge: Shiji Group.
Shiji Group scores a 4.53/5 for customer support, with reviews highlighting their professionalism, helpfulness, and prompt assistance, especially during implementation. Many users commend the support team for easing the onboarding process and resolving issues quickly, which is critical for hotel operations. easyGuestmanagement’s review count is zero, so its support quality remains unverified. Given the proven support infrastructure of Shiji, it’s the safer choice for hotels prioritizing reliable assistance. Edge: Shiji Group.
Shiji Group integrates with 64 verified partners, including prominent systems like SiteMinder, Revinate, Oaky, Amadeus, and Duetto, allowing seamless connectivity with booking engines, CRM, EPoS, and revenue tools. easyGuestmanagement offers no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with third-party systems. For hotels seeking a flexible, connected tech stack, Shiji’s extensive integrations are crucial. Edge: Shiji Group.
Although easyGuestmanagement has no reviews, Shiji Group’s platform has 32 recent reviews with a high 90% likelihood to recommend. Users from a wide range of hotel segments—luxury, branded, city center, and hostels—rate it highly for usability, features, and support. The recent reviews bolster confidence in its ongoing performance and customer satisfaction. Given the absence of recent feedback for easyGuestmanagement, Shiji’s ratings clearly lead. Edge: Shiji Group.
easyGuestmanagement does not disclose pricing, indicating it may be a free or custom-quoted solution with unclear value. Shiji Group’s platform costs $1,200 upfront, with no ongoing monthly fees specified, reflecting a typical enterprise SaaS pricing model. The significant investment in Shiji suggests a comprehensive system designed for long-term value and scalability, unlike the opaque pricing of easyGuestmanagement.
Shiji Daylight PMS offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform built for hotels of almost any size, backed by a large user base and recent positive reviews. Its robust integrations, automation, and support infrastructure make it suitable for hotels seeking efficiency and growth.
easyGuestmanagement, on the other hand, appears to be an unproven, minimal system lacking recent reviews, integrations, and support details. It might serve very small or single-property hotels with modest needs but falls short for larger, multi-property operations.
Choose Shiji if you value proven scalability, extensive features, and a vendor with a global presence. Opt for easyGuestmanagement only if your needs are minimal and risk tolerance is high, accepting the significant limitations in support and integrations.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| easyGuestmanagement |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, easyGuestmanagement GmbH and Shiji Daylight PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 86 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. easyGuestmanagement GmbH and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. easyGuestmanagement GmbH offers 0 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Daylight PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
easyGuestmanagement GmbH: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. easyGuestmanagement has an HT Score of 0 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor