The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 35 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
eKomi shines .
Qualitando shines in ease of use and customer support .
Side-by-side ratings based on 35 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 35 |
After analyzing 35 verified reviews, eKomi users most value its , while Qualitando users highlight ease of use & automation, feedback collection & analysis, reputation management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use & Automation
▾
|
|
|
+
Feedback Collection & Analysis
▾
|
|
|
+
Reputation Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Targeted Marketing & Newsletters
▾
|
|
|
−
Aesthetic Design
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-language Support
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Reputation Management vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 16 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 6 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #11 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #12 5 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #10 6 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #8 9 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #6 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Europe ▾ | — | #6 35 reviews |
When choosing between eKomi and Qualitando for reputation management, your team must consider which platform aligns best with your hotel’s priorities. eKomi’s near-zero recent reviews and stagnant ratings suggest it’s not actively serving the hotel industry anymore, whereas Qualitando’s 34 reviews from the last six months and a high NPS score indicate ongoing engagement and improvement. Both platforms aim to enhance your online reputation, but their current activity levels differ sharply.
eKomi’s lack of recent feedback and zero overall reviews imply it’s no longer a relevant choice for hotel reputation management. In contrast, Qualitando’s fresh review data and strong user satisfaction make it the more dependable option today. Would you rather invest in an active, well-supported reputation system or one that seems to have fallen behind?
eKomi was built to gather and showcase customer reviews, helping businesses establish trust and improve search rankings. But with zero reviews in the last six months and a 0/5 overall rating, it offers no recent evidence of active hotel industry support or innovation.
Qualitando, on the other hand, has accumulated 34 recent reviews, with a 9.88/5 NPS score and 99% likelihood to recommend, reflecting strong ongoing customer satisfaction. Its recent reviews praise its ease of setup, automation, and ability to boost guest reviews, making it a more relevant choice for hotels today. Do you want a platform with proven recent engagement or one that appears outdated?
If your hotel needs a reputation management platform focused on automating guest feedback collection, boosting online reviews, and ongoing support, then Qualitando is the clear choice. Its high recent review count and positive ratings demonstrate active use and continuous improvement.
If, however, your hotel primarily seeks a legacy platform with existing review integrations like Cloudbeds but doesn’t need recent updates or support, eKomi might seem appealing. But with zero recent activity, it’s unlikely to meet your hotel’s current needs. For hotels prioritizing active, recent data and support, Qualitando is the safer bet.
eKomi’s user experience is rated 0/5, with no recent reviews or evidence of active support, suggesting it’s outdated or poorly maintained. Conversely, Qualitando scores 4.76/5 in ease of use, backed by recent feedback praising its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and automation features.
Reviewers highlight Qualitando’s simple setup, and hotel teams report higher staff adoption rates thanks to its user-friendly design. If ease of implementation and daily use are top priorities, Edge: Qualitando.
eKomi offers no unique features or integrations, and no shared functionalities with Qualitando. Its limited scope makes it less attractive for hotels looking for more comprehensive reputation tools.
Qualitando provides a suite of tools including guest feedback collection, reputation management, targeted communication, and upselling features. Despite no shared features, it has a broad ecosystem of integrations, including major CRM and booking platforms, which eKomi lacks. Edge: Qualitando.
eKomi’s support and onboarding ratings are nonexistent or unreported, making it impossible to gauge its current service levels. Conversely, Qualitando’s support scores 5/5 with recent reviews praising its proactive assistance and helpful onboarding process.
Guests note that Qualitando’s support team responds quickly and effectively, ensuring smoother setup and ongoing use. With recent reviews emphasizing customer care, Edge: Qualitando.
eKomi has only one verified integration—Cloudbeds—limiting its connectivity options. In contrast, Qualitando boasts 11 verified partners, including The Data Appeal Company, Vertical Booking, Oracle Hospitality, and others, providing broader platform compatibility.
This extensive integration network allows hotels to connect seamlessly with their existing systems, automate workflows, and enrich guest data. Edge: Qualitando.
With zero recent reviews and a 0/5 overall rating, eKomi cannot be rated highly by hoteliers and appears inactive in the hotel space.
Qualitando’s 34 recent reviews with a near-perfect NPS score of 9.88/10 and 99% likelihood to recommend indicate high satisfaction across various hotel segments. Hotels in Europe, resorts, and city-center properties particularly favor it. Therefore, Edge: Qualitando.
eKomi does not provide transparent pricing or trial options, suggesting it may be outdated or tailored for large enterprise clients.
Qualitando charges a straightforward $100 monthly fee, with no additional implementation or per-room charges. Its transparent pricing and recent positive reviews about ROI reinforce its value. Edge: Qualitando.
Given eKomi’s limited recent activity, it might suit:
Not ideal if your hotel seeks active engagement, recent reviews, or modern features.
Qualitando is suitable for:
Not ideal if your hotel has very limited tech infrastructure or prefers a minimal, low-maintenance solution.
eKomi offers a legacy reputation management system with no recent reviews or active support, making it unsuitable for most hotels today. Its lack of recent engagement and functionality suggests it’s no longer a competitive choice.
Qualitando, with 34 recent reviews and a high NPS, demonstrates ongoing support and innovation. It provides a full suite of tools, integrations, and positive hotel feedback, making it the clear choice for hotels serious about managing and enhancing their online reputation now.
If your hotel values recent data, active support, and a flexible platform, go with Qualitando. Its strong recent performance and high customer satisfaction are too significant to ignore.
Choose eKomi only if you are seeking a legacy system and are prepared for potential limitations in support and features. For modern, proactive reputation management, Qualitando stands out as your best option today.
Reputation Management pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
What hoteliers love
Users repeatedly mention the platform's intuitive interface and high degree of automation. These characteristics make it easy to implement and operate... Users repeatedly mention the platform's intuitive interface and high degree of automation. These characteristics make it easy to implement and operate, which in turn saves time and reduces the workload for hotel staff. However, some note that the initial setup can be slightly complex.
Qualitando excels in collecting and analyzing guest feedback through automated surveys and satisfaction questionnaires. Hoteliers appreciate the ease... Qualitando excels in collecting and analyzing guest feedback through automated surveys and satisfaction questionnaires. Hoteliers appreciate the ease with which they can gather detailed insights on guest experiences, helping to drive continuous improvement. This functionality contributes significantly to monitoring and enhancing both service quality and guest satisfaction.
Users frequently highlight Qualitando's capacity to improve brand reputation. By collecting extensive guest reviews and pushing positive ones to platf... Users frequently highlight Qualitando's capacity to improve brand reputation. By collecting extensive guest reviews and pushing positive ones to platforms like TripAdvisor and Google, the software enhances hotel rankings and online presence. This activity not only boosts brand reputation but also drives revenue through improved guest trust and visibility.
Where hoteliers push back
Qualitando's ability to send targeted marketing materials and newsletters is acknowledged positively. However, some users express a desire for more in... Qualitando's ability to send targeted marketing materials and newsletters is acknowledged positively. However, some users express a desire for more intuitive management in selecting and segmenting user lists, calling for improvements in this feature to enhance marketing efforts.
Several reviews suggest that the platform’s graphic design and aesthetic appeal are areas for improvement. Despite positive functionality, users indic... Several reviews suggest that the platform’s graphic design and aesthetic appeal are areas for improvement. Despite positive functionality, users indicate that a more modern and attractive design could enhance the overall user experience.
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. eKomi and Qualitando share many core Reputation Management features, but each has unique capabilities. eKomi offers 1 verified integration partners, while Qualitando offers 11. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Qualitando leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
eKomi: No. Qualitando: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Reputation Management vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. eKomi has an HT Score of 0 and Qualitando has 16. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor