The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 887 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Enginyeria de Software S.A. (ENGISOFT) shines , with exclusive features like Spa & Wellness Module.
Mews shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 887 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 887 |
After analyzing 887 verified reviews, Enginyeria de Software S.A. (ENGISOFT) users most value its , while Mews users highlight ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 329 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 397 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 45 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #3 49 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #5 220 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 170 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 130 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #8 106 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #28 8 reviews |
Choosing between Engisoft by Enginyeria de Software S.A. (ENGISOFT) and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to streamline property management, but their approach, scale, and features differ significantly. While ENGISOFT offers a niche solution with a longstanding presence, Mews provides a modern, scalable platform with a vast user base. So, what does your hotel really need to succeed?
ENGISOFT’s Engisoft Cloud PMS has been around since 1992, primarily serving smaller European properties. Its cloud-based design promises modern operations but only offers a single core feature set, including a unique Spa & Wellness module. Conversely, Mews, founded in 2012, has quickly grown into a global powerhouse with over 750 reviews, a 4.62/5 rating, and a user community that spans continents.
Mews’s recent reviews—98 in the last six months—are much newer and more plentiful, giving it a clear edge in current user sentiment. Mews’s extensive feature set and broad regional presence make it more adaptable for diverse hotel types, especially those looking to scale. Would your property benefit from a broad ecosystem of third-party integrations and future-proof technology?
If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-native platform with extensive integrations and automation, go with Mews. Its modular system supports everything from booking engines to guest messaging, ideal for mid-sized or growing hotels that want to stay competitive.
On the other hand, if your property operates solely within Europe, values niche modules like Spa & Wellness, and prefers a simpler, less costly system, ENGISOFT could be sufficient. Hotels with a focus on specific amenity management might find ENGISOFT’s specialized features adequate, but for most hotels seeking scalability and modern digital tools, Mews is the stronger choice.
User experience is key for staff adoption. Mews boasts a 4.7/5 ease of use rating from 758 reviews, with many users praising its intuitive interface, modern design, and minimal training requirements. Recent reviews highlight its straightforward onboarding process, with some saying, “It’s the most user-friendly hospitality cloud on the market,” and “The platform was built with what works best, not just how things were before.”
In contrast, ENGISOFT’s review count is zero, and its usability ratings are absent. Based on the limited data, it’s unlikely to match Mews’s proven ease of adoption. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 41 features, including advanced guest communication, online check-in, channel management, and a powerful marketplace for third-party apps—more than twice the features of ENGISOFT, which offers only 18. Notably, Mews supports multi-lingual, multi-currency operations, guest CRM, and automated revenue tools, while ENGISOFT only has a single feature: its Spa & Wellness module.
If your hotel needs comprehensive automation, integrations, and guest engagement tools, Mews’s broader feature set gives it a decisive advantage. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings are solid at 4.27/5, with recent reviews emphasizing rapid response times and helpful onboarding. Users say things like, “Their support team sets new standards,” and appreciate the proactive assistance during implementation.
ENGISOFT’s reviews are nonexistent, making it impossible to gauge support quality. Given Mews’s larger, active user community and recent positive feedback, it’s clear that Mews supports hotels more reliably. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s ecosystem includes 336 verified partners, with over 1,000 integrations available through its marketplace. Common partners include channel managers, RMS, and key system providers like SiteMinder and Onity, enabling full operational connectivity.
ENGISOFT has only 8 verified partners, with limited integration options, restricting its ability to connect with other hotel systems and tools. For hotels prioritizing a flexible, connected tech stack, Mews’s ecosystem is unmatched. Edge: Mews.
With 758 recent reviews, mostly praising its simplicity, automation, and scalability, Mews scores a 4.62/5. Hotels across segments—boutiques, city hotels, hostels—rate it highly, with many calling it “the most user-friendly hospitality cloud” and “the best in class for connectivity.”
ENGISOFT, lacking review data, cannot be directly rated. But the absence of recent reviews indicates limited ongoing support or evolution compared to Mews. For contemporary satisfaction, Mews clearly leads. Edge: Mews.
ENGISOFT’s pricing details are unavailable, but it appears to be a traditional licensed or custom solution, possibly with variable costs. Mews charges a flat rate of $900 per month, with no implementation fees or hidden costs, offering transparent pricing.
Given Mews’s pricing transparency and the value delivered through updates and integrations, it’s often regarded as a cost-effective choice for growing hotels. Without clear pricing info for ENGISOFT, Mews’s predictable costs give it a clear advantage.
Not ideal if your hotel plans to grow regionally or globally, or if you require extensive automation and third-party integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel operates only within a niche market and prefers a minimal, low-cost system without extensive automation.
Mews is a cloud-based platform with a vast ecosystem, proven to support diverse hotel types globally. Its recent reviews and high user ratings demonstrate a modern, user-friendly system that adapts easily to evolving hospitality needs, making it the clear market leader for most hotels.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, future-proof system with advanced features, automation, and integrations, Mews is the smarter choice. Its extensive support network and ongoing innovation make it ideal for hotels seeking operational agility and guest satisfaction.
ENGISOFT, on the other hand, remains a niche solution with minimal recent support and limited features. It might suit small properties with very specific needs in Europe but falls short for hotels seeking scalability, automation, and modern integrations. For most hotels aiming to grow and compete effectively, Mews is the more suitable choice.
Summary: For hotels prioritizing current user experience, extensive features, and scalable growth, Mews dominates with its broad ecosystem and recent positive reviews. ENGISOFT offers a simple, regional option but lacks the versatility and support to meet today’s dynamic hospitality demands.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Engisoft and Mews PMS share 18 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module |
Showing top differences. 30 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Where hoteliers push back
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting featu... While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting features. Users express the desire for more granular data insights, particularly in reservations and revenue analysis.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Engisoft and Mews PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Engisoft offers 8 verified integration partners, while Mews PMS offers 336. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Mews PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Engisoft: No. Mews PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Enginyeria de Software S.A. (ENGISOFT) has an HT Score of 0 and Mews has 99. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor