The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 38 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Enola Labs shines .
Runtriz shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile Checkin and Guest Profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 38 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 38 |
After analyzing 38 verified reviews, Enola Labs users most value its , while Runtriz users highlight guest communication, user experience, check-in process. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Guest Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
User Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Check-in Process
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Generation
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customizability
▾
|
|
|
−
Guest Misunderstanding
▾
|
|
|
−
Notification and Alerts
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Guest Apps vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #13 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 33 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #12 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #9 11 reviews |
| Luxury | — | #15 3 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 34 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #2 24 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #1 37 reviews |
| Europe | — | #34 0 reviews |
Choosing between Enola Labs and Runtriz for your hotel’s guest engagement app hinges on what your property needs most. Both aim to enhance guest experience and streamline operations, but they diverge significantly in maturity, feature set, and market presence. Enola Labs, despite its technical expertise, offers no current reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge real-world performance. Meanwhile, Runtriz, with over 37 recent reviews and a robust set of features, emerges as the more proven solution.
Are you prioritizing a platform with established customer feedback and extensive features? Or are you exploring a custom-built solution that might still be evolving? This comparison will help you decide.
Enola Labs specializes in creating tailored digital products using web and mobile technologies. Its focus is on building customized apps to meet complex business needs, but it currently lacks any reviews, ratings, or real-world feedback. Runtriz, on the other hand, is a well-established player with a global footprint, serving over 2,500 properties across six continents. It boasts a 4.77/5 overall rating from 37 recent reviews, with a high likelihood (89%) that hotels recommend it.
Runtriz’s platform is designed specifically for the hospitality industry, integrating features like contactless check-in, mobile keys, and guest messaging, backed by a large and recent review base. Enola Labs appears more like a custom development shop rather than a ready-to-deploy product, making it less suited if you need an immediate, proven solution.
Which approach aligns better with your hotel’s maturity and operational needs?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich guest engagement platform with proven performance and extensive support, Runtriz is the clear choice. Its 12 exclusive features—such as mobile check-in, guest profiles, multilingual support, and in-room controls—are designed to improve guest experience and operational efficiency.
If your hotel relies heavily on bespoke solutions to address unique workflows and has a dedicated tech team, Enola Labs could be appealing. However, without recent reviews, it’s uncertain how well their custom apps perform in real-world hotel environments.
For most hotels seeking reliability and proven results, Runtriz is the safer, smarter option.
Runtriz scores highly on ease of use, with a 4.66/5 rating and numerous reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Hoteliers report that staff and guests find it simple to navigate, with some noting that it helps expedite check-in and communication. Its onboarding process is rated 4.23/5, indicating a smooth implementation experience.
Enola Labs, however, has no published ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess how user-friendly or adoptable their solutions are. Given their focus on custom development, the end-user experience can vary significantly depending on implementation quality.
Edge: Runtriz.
Runtriz offers 12 features exclusive to its platform, including mobile check-in, guest messaging, mobile checkout, room service ordering, and automatic translations—features that can directly enhance guest engagement and operational efficiency. It also integrates with more property management systems (14 verified partners), allowing for a more seamless experience.
Enola Labs does not currently list any proprietary features or integrations, focusing instead on creating custom solutions. This means its feature set is entirely dependent on what your team requests and how well those are executed, posing risks of inconsistency or delays.
Edge: Runtriz.
Runtriz’s support scores at 4.51/5, with reviews emphasizing its easy implementation, responsive support team, and ongoing assistance. Hoteliers highlight that the platform’s support team is accessible and helpful, often describing their experience as "smooth" and "reliable."
Enola Labs, lacking any reviews or ratings, offers no verifiable support feedback, making it difficult to assess whether their team provides consistent, responsive assistance. For a hotel seeking reassurance and proven support, Runtriz’s track record makes it the safer choice.
Edge: Runtriz.
Runtriz boasts 14 verified integrations with leading systems like Oracle Hospitality, OpenKey, SALTO, and Infor, facilitating smoother property management and guest service operations. It also supports integrations with loyalty programs, digital compendiums, and multilingual functionality.
Enola Labs currently has no listed verified integrations, implying that its custom-built apps might require more effort to connect with existing hotel systems. For hotels that depend heavily on integrated workflows, Runtriz offers a much more mature, ready-to-connect platform.
Edge: Runtriz.
Since Enola Labs has no reviews or ratings, it cannot be rated by hoteliers for performance or satisfaction. Conversely, Runtriz has a 4.77/5 overall rating from 37 recent reviews, with high marks from diverse property types, including luxury hotels, resorts, and limited-service brands.
Hotels in the luxury, resort, or branded hotel segments tend to rate Runtriz higher, often citing its ease of use, guest communication features, and reliability. The recent reviews reinforce its reputation as a mature, trusted solution.
Edge: Runtriz.
Both Enola Labs and Runtriz do not publicly disclose detailed pricing, but they do not appear to operate on a freemium or subscription model with transparent rates. Costs for Enola Labs are likely project-based, tailored to specific development needs, while Runtriz’s pricing is typically customized based on property size and feature requirements.
Your hotel will need to contact each vendor directly for quotes, but Runtriz’s transparent approach to its extensive feature set suggests a predictable investment for most hotels compared to the bespoke nature of Enola Labs.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Runtriz offers a mature, well-supported guest engagement platform backed by a large base of recent reviews. Its extensive feature set and integrations make it suitable for hotels seeking proven technology that can scale across different property types.
Enola Labs, while capable of creating tailored solutions, lacks the market presence, reviews, and proven track record necessary for most hotels to confidently implement. Its custom approach may suit innovative, resource-rich properties but is less advisable for hotels seeking reliable, out-of-the-box guest apps.
If you need a dependable, feature-rich platform with recent, positive hotel reviews, Runtriz is the clear choice. For bespoke projects with a long-term development plan, Enola Labs might be worth considering, but with caution.
This comprehensive comparison should help you make an informed choice aligned with your hotel's operational requirements, guest experience goals, and support expectations.
Hotel Guest Apps pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Enola Labs and Runtriz share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| App download | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Guest Profiles | ||
| Local Recommendations | ||
| Mobile Checkin | ||
| Web-app |
What hoteliers love
Runtriz is praised for its ability to facilitate easy and efficient communication between hotel staff and guests. It supports pre-arrival notification... Runtriz is praised for its ability to facilitate easy and efficient communication between hotel staff and guests. It supports pre-arrival notifications, real-time messaging, and service requests, which improves guest satisfaction and operational efficiency.
The platform is generally considered user-friendly and straightforward for both staff and guests. However, some users noted that the interface could b... The platform is generally considered user-friendly and straightforward for both staff and guests. However, some users noted that the interface could be more modern and visually appealing, suggesting potential areas for aesthetic improvements.
The tool streamlines and expedites check-in with features like mobile pre-check-in and real-time notifications, reducing wait times and enhancing the... The tool streamlines and expedites check-in with features like mobile pre-check-in and real-time notifications, reducing wait times and enhancing the guest experience. However, some issues with proper integration and guest understanding of pre-check-in were noted.
Where hoteliers push back
Runtriz allows a high degree of customization in setting templates and automating responses, which users found beneficial for streamlining operations... Runtriz allows a high degree of customization in setting templates and automating responses, which users found beneficial for streamlining operations and enhancing guest interaction. However, improvement in backend support for these features was suggested.
Some guests misunderstand the pre-check-in process, thinking it means they are fully checked in, leading to confusion and dissatisfaction. Clearer com... Some guests misunderstand the pre-check-in process, thinking it means they are fully checked in, leading to confusion and dissatisfaction. Clearer communication and instructions could mitigate these issues.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Enola Labs and Runtriz share many core Hotel Guest Apps features, but each has unique capabilities. Enola Labs offers 0 verified integration partners, while Runtriz offers 14. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Runtriz leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Enola Labs: No. Runtriz: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Guest Apps vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Enola Labs has an HT Score of 0 and Runtriz has 21. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor