The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 329 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Clock shines when it comes to feature richness — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
Erbon Software shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 329 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 328 | 1 |
After analyzing 329 verified reviews, Clock users most value its feature richness, operational efficiency, responsive support and regular updates, while Erbon Software users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Feature Richness
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Responsive Support and Regular Updates
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use for Training
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Error Messages
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting Feature
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #11 117 reviews | #71 0 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #7 157 reviews | #57 1 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #17 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #11 5 reviews | #43 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 165 reviews | #73 0 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #11 80 reviews | #63 0 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #8 62 reviews | #63 0 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #9 27 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 30 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 228 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #11 13 reviews | #40 0 reviews |
| Middle East | #17 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Clock PMS by Clock and Erbon PMS by Erbon Software hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and regional presence. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but Clock PMS offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with a strong global footprint, while Erbon PMS focuses on connecting all hotel operations into one seamless system. Your decision should be based on which system aligns best with your hotel’s size, segment, and growth plans.
Clock PMS emphasizes extensive features, integrations, and a well-established reputation, but Erbon’s recent reviews and higher customer ratings suggest it’s gaining ground as a user-friendly, all-in-one solution. Are you ready to prioritize a proven, broad feature set or a simplified, integrated approach?
Both Clock PMS and Erbon PMS aim to improve hotel operations, but they do so with different strengths. Clock PMS offers 32 shared features plus 26 exclusive features, including booking engine, revenue management, guest profiles, and digital registration. Erbon PMS, meanwhile, consolidates core hotel operations like reservations, housekeeping, maintenance, and POS into a single platform.
Clock’s extensive feature list and integrations—such as its native booking engine and payment processing—show a system built for hotels with diverse needs. In contrast, Erbon’s focus on connecting all hotel operations highlights its suitability for hotels seeking a unified management platform. With Clock’s higher review count (251 vs. 1 for Erbon) and more recent feedback, it’s clear Clock’s reputation is more established and current.
Do you prioritize a broad, feature-packed PMS proven at scale, or a streamlined, all-in-one system with growing positive reviews?
If your hotel requires a comprehensive, feature-rich PMS with extensive third-party integrations and regional presence, Clock PMS is the clear choice. Its versatility suits hotels of various sizes, especially those looking for advanced revenue management, guest engagement, and a wide array of automation tools. Conversely, if your hotel needs a unified system that simplifies daily operations, particularly in markets where Erbon has strong regional presence like the Americas, Erbon PMS may be more suitable.
Hotels with larger portfolios or diverse service offerings will benefit from Clock’s advanced modules and integrations, while smaller hotels or resorts focused on operational efficiency may find Erbon’s all-in-one approach more intuitive. Given Clock’s 84 rating and 251 reviews—mostly in recent months—it’s the more trusted and tested platform.
If your hotel values a proven, feature-laden PMS with a global footprint, Clock is the better pick. For hotels looking for a straightforward, integrated solution with recent high satisfaction, Erbon warrants consideration.
Clock PMS boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.78/5 and positive reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users highlight its simplicity for training new staff and the efficiency gains it provides across departments. However, some report that its extensive features can be overwhelming initially, especially for smaller teams.
Erbon PMS has a perfect 5/5 ease-of-use score, with reviews emphasizing its modern, user-friendly interface and fast onboarding. Users mention that its consolidation of multiple functions into one platform reduces the learning curve, making daily operations smoother.
Edge: Erbon PMS.
Clock PMS offers a total of 58 unique features, including payment processing, booking engine, EPoS, channel management, revenue modules, and guest profiles—many of which are absent in Erbon PMS. Its feature set is ideal for hotels that need a robust, versatile platform capable of managing complex operations and multiple revenue streams.
Erbon PMS, while comprehensive, primarily consolidates core hotel operations, and does not seem to offer as many specialized features. Its strength lies in connecting reservations, housekeeping, maintenance, POS, and finance into one system, but it lacks some of Clock’s advanced modules.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS is highly rated at 4.75/5 for customer support, with recent reviews praising its quick responses and proactive assistance. Users describe the support team as responsive and helpful, especially during onboarding, though some mention occasional delays in issue resolution.
Erbon PMS also scores a perfect 5/5 in support and onboarding, with reviews emphasizing its modern, accessible support structure and prompt communication. Since reviews for Erbon are sparse and older, Clock’s support reputation remains more reliable due to the volume and recency of feedback.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS connects to 111 verified partners, including essential integrations like TrustYou, SiteMinder, and Clock’s own booking engine, EPoS, and revenue modules. Its extensive partner network supports hotel chains that rely on diverse tools and platforms.
Erbon PMS has only 7 verified integrations, with common partners like Omnibees and Nonius, primarily focused on reservation and channel management. Its narrower integration scope might limit hotels with complex tech stacks.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS enjoys a higher overall rating of 4.8/5 with 251 reviews, mostly recent, and a 95% likelihood to recommend. Hotel segments like independent and boutique hotels give Clock top marks, praising its usability, support, and feature breadth.
Erbon PMS, with only 1 review, cannot be meaningfully rated but has a 100% likelihood to recommend from that single feedback. Given the volume and recency of Clock’s reviews, it is clearly the better-rated system in the eyes of hoteliers.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS costs $600 per month with no additional hidden fees, implementation charges, or per-room charges. Its transparent pricing makes budgeting straightforward.
Erbon PMS does not publicly list pricing, which suggests it may be customized per hotel’s needs. This lack of transparency makes direct comparison difficult but indicates it might be tailored for different hotel types or sizes.
Not ideal if you operate a small, straightforward property with minimal technology needs or if budget constraints limit monthly investment.
Not ideal if you need extensive features like revenue management or advanced guest engagement, or if your operation requires deep customization.
Clock PMS’s core advantage lies in its extensive feature set, proven global presence, and broad integration network, making it suitable for hotels with diverse and complex needs. It excels in delivering automation, revenue management, and guest engagement tools, supported by a large user base and recent positive feedback.
Erbon PMS shines as a simplified, unified platform primarily suitable for smaller hotels or those emphasizing operational integration. Its high support ratings and ease of use make it appealing for hotels prioritizing straightforward management and faster onboarding.
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich PMS with global reach and a proven track record, Clock is the recommended choice. For hotels that prioritize simplicity, integration, and regional focus, Erbon warrants consideration, though it currently lacks the depth of Clock’s feature set and recent user feedback.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Clock PMS and Erbon PMS share 32 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 14 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 6 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of feat... Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of features overwhelming and suggest improved organization.
The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contribut... The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contributing to a smoother experience for both staff and guests.
Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliabilit... Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliability and relevance to user needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the erro... Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the error message to the problem would improve user experience.
While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful... While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful capabilities.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Clock PMS and Erbon PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Clock PMS offers 111 verified integration partners, while Erbon PMS offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Erbon PMS leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.8/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Clock PMS: No. Erbon PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Clock has an HT Score of 84 and Erbon Software has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor