The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 95 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Pre-stay emails.
ETRAVELMARKETING shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 95 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 95 | 0 |
After analyzing 95 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its ease of use, revenue enhancement, customer service, while ETRAVELMARKETING users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
ETRAVELMARKETING |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Enhancement
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
|
|
+
Advanced Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Complexity and Usability Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Lag in Feature Implementation
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
ETRAVELMARKETING |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #22 11 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #15 36 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 26 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #9 6 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
ETRAVELMARKETING |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #17 32 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #12 41 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #10 34 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #14 11 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
ETRAVELMARKETING |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #7 39 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #19 14 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #16 10 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 8 reviews | — |
Choosing the right booking engine for your hotel hinges on the specific needs of your property, the sophistication of your operations, and your target market. Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine stands out with its extensive feature set, global presence, and strong user reviews. ETRAVELMARKETING, on the other hand, offers an AI-driven marketing platform with no verified reviews or regional presence, making it less concrete for hotelier decision-making. Given the data, Amadeus is the more proven choice.
Both products aim to streamline the booking process and improve direct revenue, but they diverge significantly in scope and market presence. Amadeus’ iHotelier is a dedicated booking engine with a robust feature list, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, and integration with other systems—it's designed to convert lookers into bookers efficiently. ETRAVELMARKETING focuses on AI-based marketing optimization, not on booking functionalities, making it less suited to directly drive reservations.
Amadeus benefits from a tenured presence in the hotel industry, with over 90 reviews and a 4.39/5 overall rating. ETRAVELMARKETING, lacking reviews altogether, cannot confidently demonstrate proven results or user satisfaction to hoteliers. Are you looking for a tested, feature-rich booking engine or a marketing platform with unverified claims?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, proven booking engine that enhances direct reservations and integrates with a broad ecosystem, go with Amadeus. Its extensive feature set—such as pre- and post-stay emails, booking abandonment recovery, and multi-currency support—serves properties aiming to maximize revenue and streamline operations.
If your primary focus is on leveraging AI to analyze customer reviews and optimize marketing campaigns, ETRAVELMARKETING might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews or regional presence, it’s not currently a dependable solution for direct booking needs or hotel management. For most hoteliers, Amadeus offers a safer, more established investment.
Amadeus’ iHotelier has a user rating of 4.25/5 for ease of use, with many users praising its intuitive interface and onboarding process, which averages a 4.01/5. Reviewers highlight that, although complex at first glance, daily use becomes friendly and manageable with support. Response times from customer support are mixed but generally adequate.
ETRAVELMARKETING has no published reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess ease of use or onboarding experience. The absence of verified user feedback suggests a lack of proven usability or proven customer support. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’ iHotelier Booking Engine boasts 36 unique features—ranging from mobile responsiveness, multi-lingual support, and rate comparison widgets to advanced functionalities like loyalty program integration, conversion rate reports, and Google Hotel Ads bookings. It’s a feature-rich platform designed specifically for hotels seeking customization and revenue growth.
ETRAVELMARKETING offers no verified features or functionalities, focusing primarily on AI-driven marketing insights rather than booking engine capabilities. Its lack of demonstrable features makes it difficult to compare on this front.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’ customer support scores a modest 3.22/5, with reviews citing mixed responses—some praise responsiveness, others note slow reply times. Hoteliers appreciate the dedicated account management but expect more consistency in support quality.
ETRAVELMARKETING provides no reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to evaluate its customer service. The absence of verified support metrics favors Amadeus, despite its mixed reviews. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus has verified integrations with 104 partners, including well-known systems like Priority Software, Orange Hotel Marketing, and RevControl. This extensive ecosystem allows for easy connection with PMS, revenue management, and distribution channels.
ETRAVELMARKETING has no verified integrations, limiting its capability to connect with other hotel management systems or distribution platforms. For scalable, flexible operations, Amadeus’ integration network is a clear advantage.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus has accumulated 93 reviews in the past six months, with a high overall rating of 4.39/5 and an NPS of 8.58/10. Hotels across various segments—including independent, boutique, and branded hotels—score it highly for functionality and revenue enhancement.
ETRAVELMARKETING has no reviews or recent feedback. Without concrete user ratings or recent data, its reputation remains unverified. Based on available data, Amadeus is clearly favored by hoteliers.
Edge: Amadeus.
Pricing information for both products is not publicly available, which is typical for enterprise SaaS solutions. Amadeus does not charge a flat fee or monthly per-room fee but offers tailored pricing based on hotel size and needs.
ETRAVELMARKETING’s costs are also undisclosed, with no trial or transparent pricing models available. Given the lack of pricing transparency and proven track record, Amadeus’s value proposition appears more credible.
Not ideal if your property:
Not ideal if your hotel:
The core difference is that Amadeus’ iHotelier is a proven, feature-heavy booking engine with a substantial global footprint, while ETRAVELMARKETING is an unreviewed, AI-centric marketing platform with limited evidence of effectiveness.
If your hotel seeks a reliable, comprehensive booking engine backed by thousands of reviews and extensive integrations, go with Amadeus. Its proven track record makes it the safer choice for driving direct reservations and revenue growth.
If your focus is solely on marketing optimization and review analysis, and you are comfortable with unverified claims, ETRAVELMARKETING may appeal—though it currently lacks the trust signals and proven results that most hoteliers require.
For most hoteliers, especially those prioritizing direct booking performance, Amadeus remains the definitive option. Its extensive feature set, regional presence, and solid user satisfaction make it the recommended choice.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
ETRAVELMARKETING |
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and ETRAVELMARKETING share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
ETRAVELMARKETING |
|---|---|---|
| Automated reporting | ||
| Flat, floating and discounted rates | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Post-stay emails | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Urgency messaging |
Showing top differences. 24 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth... TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth handling of reservations and rate management. This user-friendliness is a key selling point.
Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with va... Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with various channels. Mentioned are features like multi-rate display, flash sales, and the new Web 4.0 platform, which have significantly boosted direct bookings and overall revenue.
Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow re... Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow response times and difficulty in resolving issues. This inconsistency is an important consideration for potential buyers.
Where hoteliers push back
TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless conn... TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless connectivity that supports diverse functionalities and simplifies management through unified interfaces.
Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This c... Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This complexity can hinder optimal use of the system, especially for less experienced users.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and ETRAVELMARKETING share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine offers 104 verified integration partners, while ETRAVELMARKETING offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine: No. ETRAVELMARKETING: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 72 and ETRAVELMARKETING has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor