The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 22 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines .
Eventmachine shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Contact Management/CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 22 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 7 | 15 |
How each product ranks among RFPs & Proposal Management Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #10 0 reviews | #4 5 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #11 3 reviews | #7 8 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #8 2 reviews | #10 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #8 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #10 3 reviews | #6 7 reviews |
| Luxury | #8 4 reviews | #12 2 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #7 7 reviews | #9 7 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #9 0 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #5 4 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #10 1 reviews | #6 13 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #5 0 reviews | #1 2 reviews |
Choosing the right RFP and proposal management software is crucial for your hotel’s sales and event teams. Amadeus MeetingBroker® and Eventmachine both address this need but differ significantly in scope, features, and user experience. MeetingBroker® is tailored for large-scale group RFP handling with deep integrations, while Eventmachine offers a more straightforward, user-friendly approach with a focus on automating event proposals. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Both platforms aim to streamline your group RFP process, but they do so in different ways. MeetingBroker® consolidates inbound RFPs across multiple channels into a centralized hub, automating workflows to increase your team’s response speed. Meanwhile, Eventmachine simplifies the entire event quoting process, allowing your staff to generate proposals quickly and accurately with minimal effort.
However, MeetingBroker® is heavily integrated with other Amadeus systems and tailored for larger hotels managing numerous RFPs, especially those already using Delphi. Eventmachine, by contrast, is a versatile solution suitable for varied hotel types, especially smaller or boutique properties that prioritize ease of use. Do you need a comprehensive, enterprise-grade tool or a simple, effective platform?
If your hotel handles a high volume of RFPs from multiple sources and needs to automate workflows to accelerate response times, MeetingBroker® is the better option. It’s best suited for large hotels, chains, or properties with complex sales processes that benefit from deep integrations, especially with Delphi.
If your hotel focuses on simplifying event quoting, reducing errors, and maximizing revenue with minimal fuss, Eventmachine offers a more accessible, user-friendly experience. It’s ideal for small to mid-sized hotels, B&Bs, or venues looking for fast deployment and straightforward automation.
In summary, choose MeetingBroker® if your team needs robust RFP management with extensive integration. Opt for Eventmachine if your priority is quick setup, ease of use, and reliable proposal automation.
Amadeus MeetingBroker® has a UI rated 4.29/5, reflecting a generally positive experience, but reviews indicate it can be frustrating for users outside Hilton or those not using Delphi. A reviewer mentions, “It gets the job done but could be easier to use,” especially for smaller properties or less integrated systems. The onboarding process is rated 4.33/5, yet some users report slow account manager responses, which can hinder staff adoption.
Eventmachine boasts a higher ease-of-use rating at 4.7/5, with reviews highlighting its straightforward setup and intuitive interface. Users say, “Very easy to use for guests and staff,” and praise the design and editing capabilities. Customer support is rated a perfect 5/5, with comments like, “Support always helpful and result-oriented.”
Edge: Eventmachine.
MeetingBroker® offers core RFP management functions, including automated workflows, centralized inquiry tracking, and integration with Delphi. However, it does not include additional event-specific features beyond basic proposal handling.
Eventmachine provides 12 features exclusive to its platform, such as customizable BEO, proposal and contract documents, contact management, lead forms, diagrams, task management, meal planning, seating, eSignatures, dynamic pricing, and real-time live availability. These features enable more comprehensive event planning and proposal automation.
While MeetingBroker® focuses on the RFP process, Eventmachine covers a broader spectrum of event management functionalities.
Edge: Eventmachine.
Customer support ratings reveal a significant difference: MeetingBroker® scores 3.64/5, with reviews citing delays in account manager responses and difficulty resolving issues. A reviewer notes, “Help desk is great but account managers do not call back, and procedures are unclear since M-tech left.”
Eventmachine scores a perfect 5/5, with reviewers praising the support team’s helpfulness and quick responses. Comments include, “Support is always helpful and result-oriented,” and “Support always goes the extra mile,” making it the clear winner.
Edge: Eventmachine.
MeetingBroker® integrates with 104 verified partners, including major hospitality and revenue management systems like Priority Software and RevControl. This extensive network allows seamless data sharing and automations across your hotel’s tech ecosystem.
Eventmachine, on the other hand, connects with only three verified partners, such as apaleo, Hotellistat, and ibelsa. While simpler, the limited integrations may restrict advanced automation for larger or more complex hotels.
Edge: Amadeus MeetingBroker®.
Review counts favor Eventmachine, with 15 reviews in the last six months compared to only 7 for MeetingBroker®. Eventmachine’s recent reviews are almost universally positive, with a 5/5 rating and comments like, “Very attractive layout, great functionality and excellent customer service.”
MeetingBroker® reviews are more mixed, with some users citing frustration outside Hilton or Delphi environments. Its overall rating of 2.75/5 reflects inconsistent experiences.
Edge: Eventmachine.
MeetingBroker® does not publicly list pricing; typically, enterprise solutions like this involve custom quotes based on volume and integration needs. Conversely, Eventmachine charges a flat rate of $200 per month, with no free tier or trial.
If budget predictability is key, Eventmachine’s transparent pricing offers an advantage. For larger hotels with complex needs, the pricing for MeetingBroker® may be justified by its extensive features and integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
The core difference lies in scope: MeetingBroker® is a comprehensive, enterprise-grade platform suited for large hotels managing multiple channels with deep system integrations. Eventmachine offers a user-friendly, feature-rich solution ideal for smaller hotels wanting quick setup and reliable automation.
Choose MeetingBroker® if your hotel needs extensive RFP management, deep integrations, and detailed analytics. It’s better suited for large properties with complex workflows and existing Amadeus or Delphi systems.
Opt for Eventmachine if your hotel values ease of use, fast deployment, and solid proposal automation, especially if you operate a boutique or mid-sized property. Its affordability, support, and broad feature set make it a compelling choice.
In conclusion, for hotels prioritizing advanced, integrated RFP workflows, MeetingBroker® remains the more robust option. For those seeking simplicity, practical features, and excellent support, Eventmachine wins decisively.
RFPs & Proposal Management Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus - MeetingBroker® and EVENTMACHINE share 6 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Contact Management/CRM | ||
| Content & File Management | ||
| Customizable BEO, Proposal and Contract Documents | ||
| Diagramming & Floorplanning | ||
| Lead Forms | ||
| Task Management (Tasks & Reminders) |
Ranks higher for
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus - MeetingBroker® and EVENTMACHINE share many core RFPs & Proposal Management Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus - MeetingBroker® offers 104 verified integration partners, while EVENTMACHINE offers 3. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. EVENTMACHINE leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus - MeetingBroker®: No. EVENTMACHINE: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most RFPs & Proposal Management Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 0 and Eventmachine has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor