The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 166 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
eviivo shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Vacation Rentals & Villas properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Financial Reporting and Mobile App.
Maxxton shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 166 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 166 | 0 |
After analyzing 166 verified reviews, eviivo users most value its customer support experience, user-friendly interface, onboarding and account activation, while Maxxton users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer support experience
▾
|
|
|
+
User-friendly interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and account activation
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with third parties
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Advanced feature documentation
▾
|
|
|
−
Guest communication automation
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Vacation Rental Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #1 40 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 17 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 5 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #2 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #1 23 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #1 13 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #1 7 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 19 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 110 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #2 1 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #2 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ VRS and Maxxton hinges on your specific needs and property portfolio. Both platforms aim to streamline vacation rental management, but they do so with different strengths. eviivo, backed by over 150 recent reviews and a high satisfaction score, is a well-established leader with a broad feature set. Maxxton, although less reviewed, offers an extensive solution tailor-made for larger operations like campsites and serviced apartments. How do these differences affect your property management?
eviivo is a highly-rated, user-friendly platform that excels in managing multiple property types and regions, especially for vacation rentals and boutique hotels. Maxxton, on the other hand, targets larger, complex operations with a customizable SaaS model, but it lacks recent user reviews, making eviivo’s proven track record more compelling. What will best serve your property portfolio?
eviivo is designed for small to medium-sized vacation rental portfolios, especially those needing an intuitive interface and quick setup. Its core strength lies in managing multiple properties within a single dashboard, automating guest communication, and connecting with numerous OTAs via 32 verified partners.
Maxxton, while not explicitly focused on hotels, offers a comprehensive solution for larger operations like holiday parks, campsites, and serviced apartments, emphasizing operational automation and integration. However, without recent reviews, its suitability for boutique or small hotel properties remains untested.
Given eviivo’s 150 reviews in the last six months and a 4.77 support rating, it’s more reliable for hoteliers seeking immediate, proven solutions. Maxxton’s lack of recent feedback makes its effectiveness less clear. Are you managing a small to medium vacation rental, or do your operations extend to large-scale resorts?
If your hotel primarily manages vacation rentals, B&Bs, or boutique hotels seeking a straightforward, highly reviewed platform, go with eviivo. Its strong user ratings and extensive property management features make it ideal for portfolios of any size within its target segment.
If your hotel operates at a large scale, such as a holiday park, campsite, or serviced apartment complex with over 100 units requiring tailored integrations and operational automation, Maxxton may fit better. Its SaaS architecture supports large, complex operations, but the absence of recent reviews makes it less certain.
For hoteliers prioritizing ease of use and proven customer support, eviivo’s extensive recent feedback confirms its position. Meanwhile, Maxxton’s flexibility and scope could appeal to large enterprises ready to invest in customized solutions. Which profile best reflects your property’s needs?
eviivo boasts a 4.65/5 rating for ease of use, with many users praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding process. Clients mention that the platform’s simple navigation reduces the learning curve, allowing staff to adopt it rapidly and manage multiple properties efficiently.
Maxxton, lacking recent review data, does not publicly showcase user experience ratings. Its platform is described as user-friendly, but the absence of recent feedback makes it harder to gauge how easily your team could adapt.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo offers 29 unique features, including trust accounting, owner statements, a booking engine, mobile check-in/out, review management, and advanced pricing automation. These features support comprehensive property, guest, and financial management within one platform.
Maxxton provides a broad operational suite tailored for large-scale operations, including reservation automation, connectivity with third-party partners like SiteMinder and Airbnb, and a centralized database. However, it lacks the extensive feature count of eviivo, with no detailed list of specific features.
Edge: eviivo, with its broader and more detailed feature set.
eviivo’s support is rated 4.77/5, with recent reviews highlighting highly responsive and knowledgeable staff. Clients appreciate the onboarding process, quick issue resolution, and the availability of support during critical phases of setup.
Maxxton’s support data is unavailable, making it difficult to assess its responsiveness or quality. The lack of recent reviews raises questions about the level of customer service and implementation assistance.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo integrates with 32 verified partners, covering channel managers, payment gateways, review platforms, and more. Its extensive partner network includes Trust Accounting, Experience Hotel, Tripadvisor, and others, facilitating comprehensive operational connectivity.
Maxxton connects with 12 verified partners, including industry giants like SiteMinder, Airbnb, and Revinate. While still robust, its fewer integrations might limit your options for expanding or customizing your tech stack.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s 150 recent reviews with a 4.77/5 support score and a 97% likelihood to recommend indicate strong satisfaction among vacation rental managers and boutique hoteliers. Hotels and B&Bs particularly praise its ease of use and support quality.
Maxxton has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to gauge user satisfaction. Its target market suggests high ratings for larger, complex operations, but without current data, eviivo’s positive recent feedback makes it the safer choice.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo charges a $700 monthly flat fee with no free tier or trial. Pricing details for Maxxton are not publicly available, but its SaaS solution typically involves customized implementation and pricing based on property count and complexity.
Given the transparent cost structure, eviivo’s predictable pricing may suit small to medium portfolios, while Maxxton’s custom pricing can accommodate larger, more complex operations.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
eviivo is a proven, highly-rated vacation rental management platform with extensive recent reviews, offering 29 features, a user-friendly interface, and a broad integration network. Its support and onboarding are highly praised, making it ideal for small to medium-sized properties.
Maxxton delivers a comprehensive, customizable SaaS solution designed for large-scale hospitality operations, like parks or serviced apartments, but lacks recent user feedback. Its strengths lie in automation and connectivity for complex, expanding portfolios.
For most hoteliers, especially those managing vacation rentals or boutique hotels, eviivo remains the stronger choice. Meanwhile, large operators with complex needs and a willingness to invest in tailored solutions may find Maxxton better suited, despite limited recent review data.
In summary, if your property management needs are aligned with eviivo’s strengths—ease of use, proven support, and extensive features—you're likely to see quicker benefits and higher satisfaction. If you operate a large, multi-property enterprise seeking a flexible, integrated platform, Maxxton’s offering could be a fit, but caution is advised given the lack of recent user feedback.
According to HTR's product database, eviivo Suite™ VRS and Maxxton share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Financial Reporting | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Owner Statements | ||
| Regional Tax Reporting | ||
| Task Management | ||
| Trust Accounting |
Showing top differences. 17 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 7 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Grâce à eviivo, j'ai l'ensemble des hébergements que je propose, centralisés au même endroit avec une visibilité facilitée pour connaître la situation de mes locations."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Building the business with eviivo Suite was extremely easy I have to say, because of the simplicity of using the system…For us, as a property management company, it’s impossible to..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
While most reviews positively note the expertise and responsiveness of eviivo's support team, a few mention the need for better training of chat repre... While most reviews positively note the expertise and responsiveness of eviivo's support team, a few mention the need for better training of chat representatives and more robust resources or tutorials for advanced features.
Users consistently commend eviivo for its simple and intuitive interface, which simplifies daily management tasks and reduces the learning curve for n... Users consistently commend eviivo for its simple and intuitive interface, which simplifies daily management tasks and reduces the learning curve for new users or those transitioning from other platforms.
The onboarding process is generally viewed positively, with users noting the quick and efficient account activation allowing them to integrate eviivo... The onboarding process is generally viewed positively, with users noting the quick and efficient account activation allowing them to integrate eviivo into their operations rapidly, bolstered by supportive guidance from staff.
Where hoteliers push back
There are calls for more comprehensive guides on advanced features, with users seeking deeper insights or tutorials directly from the platform to bett... There are calls for more comprehensive guides on advanced features, with users seeking deeper insights or tutorials directly from the platform to better leverage these capabilities for sales optimization.
The software's automated communication tools facilitate smooth interactions with guests across different stages of their stay, with users appreciating... The software's automated communication tools facilitate smooth interactions with guests across different stages of their stay, with users appreciating the time saved in handling routine communication tasks, although some seek more personalized email customization options.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. eviivo Suite™ VRS and Maxxton share many core Vacation Rental Software features, but each has unique capabilities. eviivo Suite™ VRS offers 32 verified integration partners, while Maxxton offers 12. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. eviivo Suite™ VRS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
eviivo Suite™ VRS: No. Maxxton: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Vacation Rental Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. eviivo has an HT Score of 100 and Maxxton has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor