The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 208 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
eviivo shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Vacation Rentals & Villas properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
GMS Hutter GmbH & Co KG shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 208 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 208 | 0 |
After analyzing 208 verified reviews, eviivo users most value its responsive customer support, onboarding expertise, technical efficiency, while GMS Hutter GmbH & Co KG users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
GMS Hutter GmbH & Co KG |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Responsive Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding Expertise
▾
|
|
|
+
Technical Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking and Reservation Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Improvement Suggestions
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Feature Development
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
GMS Hutter GmbH & Co KG |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #15 54 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #23 23 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #20 8 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #18 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
GMS Hutter GmbH & Co KG |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #19 41 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #16 38 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #19 21 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #10 18 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
GMS Hutter GmbH & Co KG |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #15 39 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #6 142 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #33 2 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #29 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ PMS and GMS Hotel Felix hinges on your hotel’s size, operational needs, and market focus. Both aim to streamline property management, but eviivo’s extensive review history and feature set suggest a more mature, hotel-oriented solution, while GMS Hotel Felix offers a centralized platform primarily suited for smaller operations. The core question: which system aligns best with your hotel’s growth trajectory and specific requirements?
eviivo Suite™ offers a comprehensive, multi-feature platform with widespread adoption and recent, positive user feedback, whereas GMS Hotel Felix remains less reviewed and less widely used. Are you prioritizing a proven solution with rich integrations and proven performance, or a more simplified system with streamlined core functions?
eviivo Suite™ excels in supporting a wide range of property types, especially independent hotels, B&Bs, vacation rentals, and small to medium-sized portfolios. Its user reviews highlight ease of booking management, guest communication, and integration with major OTAs, making it ideal for operators seeking automation and seamless distribution.
GMS Hotel Felix, by contrast, appears to target smaller hotels and properties that require centralization of core functions like reservations, check-ins, and billing. Its limited review data and absence of recent feedback suggest it hasn't achieved the same market penetration or robustness as eviivo.
The key divergence: eviivo is a well-rounded, flexible platform used globally with a broad feature set, while GMS Hotel Felix offers a basic, centralized management tool. Do you need a platform that covers advanced revenue tools, guest marketing, and multi-channel management? If yes, eviivo is the clear choice.
If your hotel needs an all-in-one platform supporting multiple property types, extensive integrations, and automation for reservations, guest messaging, and reporting, go with eviivo. Its large user base (over 28,000 accommodations) and 191 recent reviews—most highly positive—underscore its reliability and versatility.
If your hotel requires a straightforward system primarily for reservation and housekeeping management without extensive OTA or revenue features, GMS Hotel Felix might suffice. However, with no recent reviews or significant market presence, it’s less proven in handling complex or growing hotel operations.
For hoteliers aiming to scale or improve guest engagement through automation and integrations, eviivo’s proven track record makes it the stronger recommendation. GMS Hotel Felix may serve smaller, less complex operations, but lacks the depth and recent validation of eviivo.
eviivo Suite™ boasts a high user rating of 4.43/5 for ease of use, supported by consistent positive feedback about its intuitive interface and onboarding support. Its mobile app and automation features are praised for saving time and reducing errors, with support staff frequently highlighted for responsiveness.
GMS Hotel Felix, lacking review data and ratings, offers no concrete insights into usability or onboarding. Its smaller employee count suggests a leaner setup, but without recent feedback, it’s hard to gauge ease of adoption or ongoing support.
Edge: eviivo Suite™. Its clear user ratings and recent positive reviews confirm it’s the more user-friendly, well-supported solution.
eviivo provides 51 exclusive features, including a channel manager, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, automated messaging, online check-in, and real-time reporting. These tools are designed to optimize operational efficiency and guest experience.
GMS Hotel Felix offers core functionalities like reservations, check-ins, billing, and housekeeping coordination but lacks the extensive feature depth and integrations present in eviivo. It does not list additional modules or unique features beyond its core functions.
End result: eviivo’s broad feature set supports complex operations, automation, and growth strategies, whereas GMS Hotel Felix offers a more static, limited toolkit. Edge: eviivo Suite™.
eviivo’s customer support scores 4.42/5, with reviews praising its quick and helpful assistance, especially during onboarding. Support staff like Xavier and Joseph are frequently mentioned as key to a smooth experience, which is vital for busy hoteliers.
GMS Hotel Felix, with no recent reviews or support ratings, offers no verified insights into its service quality. Its smaller team of 20 employees may suggest less dedicated support, but the lack of recent user feedback makes this uncertain.
Edge: eviivo Suite™. The strong, recent support ratings and review comments favor eviivo’s superior customer service.
eviivo boasts 32 verified partner integrations, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, Airbnb, and Google Hotel Ads, plus experience management and payment providers. These integrations enable seamless distribution and operational automation.
GMS Hotel Felix currently lists zero verified integrations, limiting its capacity to connect with third-party systems, which could hinder growth and efficiency for dynamic hotels.
Edge: eviivo Suite™. Its extensive integration network supports sophisticated distribution and automation.
eviivo’s user rating of 0.93/5 is notably low, but the 20 recent reviews and 95% likelihood of recommendation demonstrate a resilient and engaged user community. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and feature set, especially in the UK and Europe.
GMS Hotel Felix, with no recent reviews or ratings, cannot be reliably compared. Its lack of feedback suggests it’s not as widely adopted or appreciated.
Given the volume and recency of eviivo’s reviews, it’s the clear leader in user satisfaction. Edge: eviivo Suite™.
eviivo’s pricing starts at a flat $700 per month, with no free tier, trial, or implementation fees. Its transparent pricing aligns with its extensive feature set.
GMS Hotel Felix does not publicly disclose pricing details, which suggests a custom quote process and potentially higher or less predictable costs. The lack of clear pricing may be a barrier for some hotels.
Edge: eviivo Suite™ for transparency and predictable expense.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
At its core, eviivo Suite™ is a comprehensive, multi-feature platform with proven, recent success stories across diverse property types. Its vast integration network, high user satisfaction, and ongoing support make it a clear choice for hotels seeking growth and operational efficiency.
Choose eviivo if you need a flexible, scalable system that supports automation, multiple channels, and guest engagement—especially if your property is poised to expand. It’s the safer, more validated option backed by recent reviews and extensive usage.
GMS Hotel Felix, lacking recent validation and a broad feature set, may suit very small or straightforward properties that do not require extensive automation or integrations. However, without recent user feedback or significant market presence, it’s less likely to meet the evolving demands of modern hotels.
In conclusion, for hotels looking for a tried-and-true property management system with proven functionality and ongoing support, eviivo Suite™ remains the recommended choice. GMS Hotel Felix may be suitable for minimalist operations, but its limited recent data and features make it less compelling for growth-focused hoteliers.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
GMS Hutter GmbH & Co KG | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, eviivo Suite™ PMS and GMS Hotel Felix share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
GMS Hutter GmbH & Co KG |
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Eviivo's customer support is frequently lauded for its responsiveness and efficiency. Support staff, such as Mr. Guetif, Joseph, and Xavier, provide e... Eviivo's customer support is frequently lauded for its responsiveness and efficiency. Support staff, such as Mr. Guetif, Joseph, and Xavier, provide exemplary assistance, which is crucial during the onboarding phase and when issues arise, enhancing overall user experience.
The platform offers expertise during the onboarding process, helping hotels integrate the system seamlessly. This guidance ensures consistent integrat... The platform offers expertise during the onboarding process, helping hotels integrate the system seamlessly. This guidance ensures consistent integration of information and optimal use of the PMS features, enhancing property management efficiency.
Eviivo is recognized for its technical efficiency, enabling users to complete tasks faster and with fewer errors. This reduces downtime and improves o... Eviivo is recognized for its technical efficiency, enabling users to complete tasks faster and with fewer errors. This reduces downtime and improves operational workflow, ensuring a smooth experience for hotel management.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users suggest improvements, particularly in expanding features such as mobile app development and more concrete daily usage tips to further optim... Some users suggest improvements, particularly in expanding features such as mobile app development and more concrete daily usage tips to further optimize business operations and leverage the platform’s capabilities.
While users are generally satisfied, there are requests for more customization options, including web and mobile app enhancements, which would further... While users are generally satisfied, there are requests for more customization options, including web and mobile app enhancements, which would further suit specific operational needs and provide additional value.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. eviivo Suite™ PMS and GMS Hotel Felix share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. eviivo Suite™ PMS offers 32 verified integration partners, while GMS Hotel Felix offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. eviivo Suite™ PMS leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
eviivo Suite™ PMS: No. GMS Hotel Felix: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. eviivo has an HT Score of 87 and GMS Hutter GmbH & Co KG has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor