The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 208 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
eviivo shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Vacation Rentals & Villas properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
NEC shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 208 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 208 | 0 |
After analyzing 208 verified reviews, eviivo users most value its responsive customer support, onboarding expertise, technical efficiency, while NEC users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
NEC |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Responsive Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding Expertise
▾
|
|
|
+
Technical Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking and Reservation Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Improvement Suggestions
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Feature Development
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
NEC |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #15 54 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #23 23 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #20 8 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #18 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
NEC |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #19 41 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #16 38 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #19 21 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #10 18 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
NEC |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #15 39 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #6 142 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #33 2 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #29 1 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system can significantly impact your hotel's operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both eviivo Suite™ by eviivo and Nehops by NEC aim to optimize these areas, but they serve different types of users and come with distinct strengths and weaknesses. While eviivo stands out as a well-established, review-backed solution with comprehensive features, Nehops offers a specialized AI-driven approach focused on revenue optimization. Which system aligns better with your hotel's needs?
eviivo Suite™ has a longstanding reputation in the hospitality industry, with over 191 recent reviews and a high overall rating of 4.43/5 for ease of use, reflecting strong user satisfaction. Its broad feature set—ranging from channel management to guest communications—addresses a wide array of hotel management needs. Conversely, Nehops, with no recent reviews or ratings available, emphasizes AI-driven revenue insights, but its lack of user feedback makes its practical benefits less verifiable. Are you seeking a proven platform or an innovative, AI-powered tool?
eviivo’s platform is tailored toward diverse accommodation types like B&Bs, vacation rentals, and boutique hotels, with a focus on operational simplicity and broad integrations. Nehops appears more suited for properties seeking advanced revenue management, especially those comfortable experimenting with AI-driven insights. Do you prioritize a tested, feature-rich PMS or a cutting-edge revenue optimizer?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, all-in-one PMS that simplifies property management and guest communication, go with eviivo. It’s ideal for independent hotels, B&Bs, and vacation rentals aiming for streamlined operations and strong online distribution. If your primary goal is to boost revenue through sophisticated pricing strategies and you’re open to utilizing AI insights, Nehops could be appealing, but its lack of reviews makes it a risky choice at this stage.
For hotels with limited staff and a focus on ease of use, quick onboarding, and reliable support, eviivo's high ratings (4.38/5 onboarding, 4.42/5 support) make it the more dependable option. If your team is tech-savvy and looking to leverage AI to fine-tune pricing, Nehops might be worth exploring, though it currently lacks the proven track record that eviivo offers.
eviivo Suite™ is rated 4.43/5 for ease of use, with a well-designed interface and positive feedback on onboarding and staff adoption. Users frequently mention its intuitive navigation and helpful onboarding process, which accelerate staff training. Its mobile app adds to convenience, making it accessible on the go. In contrast, Nehops has no publicly available user ratings or reviews, so its usability remains unverified.
eviivo’s interface has been praised for its simplicity, enabling your team to manage reservations, communications, and reporting efficiently. The support team’s responsiveness further eases the onboarding process. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo Suite™ offers a robust menu of 51 unique features, including channel management, revenue management, payment processing, online check-in/out, guest CRM, automated messaging, and house-keeping modules. It also provides integrations with 32 verified partners, ensuring your property can connect with major OTAs and payment systems. Nehops, on the other hand, has no listed features or integrations, focusing solely on AI-driven review summaries and recommendations.
eviivo’s comprehensive feature set caters to operational needs for properties of all sizes and types, providing tools to automate tasks, enhance guest interactions, and improve financial management. Nehops’ AI insights are promising but lack the breadth of tools necessary for day-to-day management. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s support ratings are high, with a 4.42/5 score and frequent praise for responsiveness. Users have highlighted support staff such as Mr. Guetif and Xavier for their dedication and helpfulness, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. Nehops offers no publicly available support reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its customer service quality.
Given the complexity of property management, strong support can be crucial. eviivo’s established presence and positive reviews suggest your team will receive reliable assistance when needed. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo boasts 32 verified integrations, including major online travel agencies like Expedia, Booking.com, Airbnb, and several channel managers such as eRevMax. Its extensive partner network allows you to synchronize rates, availability, and guest data effortlessly. Nehops has no listed integrations or partner connections, limiting its current adaptability within existing hotel systems.
This breadth of integrations means your hotel can operate smoothly across multiple channels without manual updates, saving time and reducing errors. Nehops’ lack of integrations suggests it’s still establishing its ecosystem. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s recent reviews reflect a 4.43/5 ease of use rating and a 4.42/5 support rating, with 95% of reviewers recommending it. Hotels across segments like vacation rentals, B&Bs, and boutique hotels praise its simplicity, reliability, and customer service. Since Nehops lacks reviews or ratings, any user sentiment remains unknown, and its real-world performance cannot be confirmed.
In the last six months, eviivo’s review count of 20 reinforces its active, satisfied user base. This recent feedback demonstrates ongoing customer trust. Given the data, eviivo’s higher and more recent ratings make it the preferred choice. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo charges a base fee of $700 per month, with no free tier, freemium options, or trial offers. The pricing model is straightforward but represents a significant investment, reflective of its extensive features. No pricing information is available for Nehops, indicating it may be a custom or enterprise solution, or simply lacking transparent pricing.
Considering eviivo’s clear cost structure and feature richness, your hotel can evaluate the ROI more accurately. The absence of pricing data for Nehops makes direct comparison impossible, but its unestablished market presence suggests it may be less scalable or transparent.
Not ideal if your hotel is a large, enterprise-scale operation needing highly customized workflows or advanced revenue management—though eviivo’s feature set covers many needs.
Edge: eviivo.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a full PMS, guest management, or operational tools—since Nehops lacks those features and reviews. It’s also less suitable for properties that value proven support and broad integrations.
Edge: Not applicable due to lack of reviews and feature data.
eviivo Suite™ offers a comprehensive, user-rated management platform with extensive features, integrations, and dedicated support, making it suitable for a broad range of property types. Its recent reviews and high ratings provide confidence that your team will find value and reliability in this system, especially if operational simplicity and guest communications are priorities.
Nehops, while promising as an AI-driven revenue management tool, currently lacks reviews, features, and integrations needed for day-to-day property management. Its focus on revenue optimization could benefit larger or more technically advanced properties, but without real-world performance data, it’s a more uncertain choice.
Choose eviivo if your goal is a proven, all-in-one management system with strong user backing. If your hotel is a larger, revenue-focused operation comfortable with AI tools, Nehops might be worth monitoring as it develops.
In summary, for most hotels seeking stability, breadth of features, and recent positive reviews, eviivo remains the stronger option. Nehops’s niche appeal and lack of verified user feedback make it a less reliable choice for now.
According to HTR's product database, eviivo Suite™ PMS and Nehops share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
NEC |
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Eviivo's customer support is frequently lauded for its responsiveness and efficiency. Support staff, such as Mr. Guetif, Joseph, and Xavier, provide e... Eviivo's customer support is frequently lauded for its responsiveness and efficiency. Support staff, such as Mr. Guetif, Joseph, and Xavier, provide exemplary assistance, which is crucial during the onboarding phase and when issues arise, enhancing overall user experience.
The platform offers expertise during the onboarding process, helping hotels integrate the system seamlessly. This guidance ensures consistent integrat... The platform offers expertise during the onboarding process, helping hotels integrate the system seamlessly. This guidance ensures consistent integration of information and optimal use of the PMS features, enhancing property management efficiency.
Eviivo is recognized for its technical efficiency, enabling users to complete tasks faster and with fewer errors. This reduces downtime and improves o... Eviivo is recognized for its technical efficiency, enabling users to complete tasks faster and with fewer errors. This reduces downtime and improves operational workflow, ensuring a smooth experience for hotel management.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users suggest improvements, particularly in expanding features such as mobile app development and more concrete daily usage tips to further optim... Some users suggest improvements, particularly in expanding features such as mobile app development and more concrete daily usage tips to further optimize business operations and leverage the platform’s capabilities.
While users are generally satisfied, there are requests for more customization options, including web and mobile app enhancements, which would further... While users are generally satisfied, there are requests for more customization options, including web and mobile app enhancements, which would further suit specific operational needs and provide additional value.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. eviivo Suite™ PMS and Nehops share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. eviivo Suite™ PMS offers 32 verified integration partners, while Nehops offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. eviivo Suite™ PMS leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
eviivo Suite™ PMS: No. Nehops: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. eviivo has an HT Score of 87 and NEC has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor