The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 208 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
eviivo shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Vacation Rentals & Villas properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Box shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 208 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 208 | 0 |
After analyzing 208 verified reviews, eviivo users most value its responsive customer support, onboarding expertise, technical efficiency, while Box users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Box |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Responsive Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding Expertise
▾
|
|
|
+
Technical Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking and Reservation Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Improvement Suggestions
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Feature Development
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Box |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #15 54 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #23 23 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #20 8 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #18 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Box |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #19 41 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #16 38 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #19 21 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #10 18 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Box |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #15 39 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #6 142 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #33 2 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #29 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ PMS and Sign Request by Box hinges on what your hotel needs most. eviivo is a comprehensive property management system built specifically for hospitality providers, while Box's Sign Request is a document signing tool with no specific features tailored to hotel operations. Are you looking for an all-in-one PMS or a simple digital signature solution? Let’s explore how each stacks up.
eviivo Suite™ is designed to streamline your daily operations, offering reservation management, guest communication, channel distribution, and revenue tools all within one platform. Sign Request by Box, however, is solely focused on contract signing workflows, with no built-in hotel-specific features or management modules. While eviivo’s broad functionality targets operational efficiency, Sign Request’s niche is digital document signing. Which core needs do you prioritize: comprehensive property management or streamlined contract signing?
More recent reviews favor eviivo’s robust suite, especially given its 191 feedback entries in the last six months, compared to Sign Request’s lack of recent user feedback or review data. eviivo’s overall rating of 0.93/5 (with a high NPS score of 8.87/5) indicates active, ongoing user engagement, whereas Sign Request has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to gauge its effectiveness in hotel settings.
If your hotel requires a full property management system that covers reservations, guest communications, reporting, revenue management, and integrations, eviivo is the clear choice. It’s ideal for independent hotels, B&Bs, vacation rentals, and multi-property portfolios seeking operational control and growth. Conversely, if your immediate need is for digital signature workflows—perhaps for contracts or agreements—Sign Request might suffice, though it lacks hotel management features and has no proven track record in hospitality.
Given eviivo’s extensive feature set and proven hospitality focus, it’s the better fit for hotels looking to optimize day-to-day operations and expand. Sign Request’s simplicity could be attractive for smaller, non-hospitality document workflows but doesn’t replace a PMS.
eviivo scores a 4.43/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, onboarding process, and mobile app. Users frequently mention that the platform reduces manual work and simplifies complex tasks, though some note that initial learning curves exist with its extensive features. Support staff are recognized for responsive onboarding, helping teams adapt smoothly.
In contrast, Sign Request by Box, as a dedicated eSignature tool, is generally straightforward to implement and use, focusing solely on document signing. However, it has no specific usability ratings or recent user feedback relevant to hotel management. Edge: eviivo, for its tailored user experience and ongoing support.
eviivo offers 51 features unique to its platform, including channel management, revenue tracking, online check-in, guest messaging, task management, integrated payments, mobile app access, and extensive reporting tools. Sign Request, meanwhile, provides only digital signature capabilities, lacking any hotel-specific features or management modules.
If your hotel needs features like automated guest communication, booking engine, housekeeping management, and multi-channel distribution, eviivo’s comprehensive suite provides an undeniable edge. Sign Request cannot meet these core operational needs. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s customer support scores highly at 4.42/5, with recent reviews highlighting the responsiveness and expertise of support staff like Joseph and Xavier. Users consistently praise the onboarding assistance and ongoing help, emphasizing that support enhances their overall experience.
Sign Request lacks recent reviews or detailed support ratings, and no testimonials or user feedback is available to assess its support quality. Given eviivo’s established hospitality support infrastructure, it clearly offers better assistance. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo integrates with 32 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, Airbnb, and Google Hotel Ads, enabling smooth synchronization of rates, availability, and guest data. Sign Request offers no listed integrations relevant to hotel operations or property management.
For hotels seeking to connect their PMS with distribution channels, payment providers, and other hotel tech, eviivo provides a broad, proven integration network. Sign Request’s limited scope makes it unsuitable for operational integration needs. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s recent reviews show a strong approval rate, with a 95% likelihood to recommend and high ratings for ease of use, support, and value. Its review count of 191 in the last six months indicates active user engagement across various hotel segments.
Sign Request has no recent reviews or ratings within the hotel space, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Given the volume and recency of eviivo’s feedback, it is clearly the more trusted option among hoteliers. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo charges a base price of $700 per month, with no freemium or free trial options listed. It’s a flat, subscription-based fee, with no implementation or setup fees. In contrast, Sign Request has no publicly available pricing details or subscription models provided, making direct comparison difficult.
If you need transparent, predictable costs for a comprehensive PMS, eviivo provides clear pricing. Sign Request’s lack of pricing transparency limits its suitability for budget-conscious hotels.
eviivo delivers a full-featured property management system tailored to hospitality, streamlining operations and enhancing guest experiences. Its extensive integrations, recent reviews, and dedicated support make it the prime choice for hotels seeking growth and efficiency. Sign Request, while effective for digital signatures, doesn’t meet the core needs of hotel management and lacks recent hotel-centric reviews.
Choose eviivo if operational control and scalability matter most. Opt for Sign Request only if your focus is purely on document signing outside of hotel management workflows. Overall, eviivo’s proven track record and active user base make it the stronger investment for your hotel’s future.
According to HTR's product database, eviivo Suite™ PMS and Sign Request share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Box |
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Eviivo's customer support is frequently lauded for its responsiveness and efficiency. Support staff, such as Mr. Guetif, Joseph, and Xavier, provide e... Eviivo's customer support is frequently lauded for its responsiveness and efficiency. Support staff, such as Mr. Guetif, Joseph, and Xavier, provide exemplary assistance, which is crucial during the onboarding phase and when issues arise, enhancing overall user experience.
The platform offers expertise during the onboarding process, helping hotels integrate the system seamlessly. This guidance ensures consistent integrat... The platform offers expertise during the onboarding process, helping hotels integrate the system seamlessly. This guidance ensures consistent integration of information and optimal use of the PMS features, enhancing property management efficiency.
Eviivo is recognized for its technical efficiency, enabling users to complete tasks faster and with fewer errors. This reduces downtime and improves o... Eviivo is recognized for its technical efficiency, enabling users to complete tasks faster and with fewer errors. This reduces downtime and improves operational workflow, ensuring a smooth experience for hotel management.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users suggest improvements, particularly in expanding features such as mobile app development and more concrete daily usage tips to further optim... Some users suggest improvements, particularly in expanding features such as mobile app development and more concrete daily usage tips to further optimize business operations and leverage the platform’s capabilities.
While users are generally satisfied, there are requests for more customization options, including web and mobile app enhancements, which would further... While users are generally satisfied, there are requests for more customization options, including web and mobile app enhancements, which would further suit specific operational needs and provide additional value.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. eviivo Suite™ PMS and Sign Request share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. eviivo Suite™ PMS offers 32 verified integration partners, while Sign Request offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. eviivo Suite™ PMS leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
eviivo Suite™ PMS: No. Sign Request: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. eviivo has an HT Score of 87 and Box has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor