The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 208 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
eviivo shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Vacation Rentals & Villas properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Winner Hotel Software shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 208 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 208 | 0 |
After analyzing 208 verified reviews, eviivo users most value its responsive customer support, onboarding expertise, technical efficiency, while Winner Hotel Software users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Responsive Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding Expertise
▾
|
|
|
+
Technical Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking and Reservation Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Improvement Suggestions
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Feature Development
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #15 54 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #23 23 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #20 8 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #18 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #19 41 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #16 38 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #19 21 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #10 18 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #15 39 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #6 142 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #33 2 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #29 1 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) for your hotel hinges on your operational needs, size, and growth ambitions. Both eviivo Suite™ by eviivo and Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in user experience, features, and market reach. eviivo’s long-standing presence in independent and small hotel segments, combined with its extensive reviews, makes it a more reliable choice for most hoteliers today. Do you prioritize proven user satisfaction and comprehensive functionality?
While Winner PMS offers a solid core of reservation and operational features, it has yet to demonstrate the same level of adoption, recent reviews, or user feedback as eviivo. With more recent reviews and a higher review count, eviivo’s reputation is clearer and more current. So, which system aligns better with your hotel’s scale and future plans?
eviivo Suite and Winner PMS both target hotel operators who want to manage reservations, guest communications, and operations efficiently. eviivo’s system is praised for its ease of use, customer support, and feature richness, especially within independent hotel, B&B, and vacation rental markets. Winner PMS, on the other hand, emphasizes operational centralization and integration, but its lack of recent reviews and limited market presence make it harder to assess its current effectiveness.
eviivo’s platform is built for various accommodation types, from small B&Bs to large resorts, with over 191 reviews and a 95% recommendation rate in the last six months. Conversely, Winner PMS has no recent reviews or detailed user feedback available, which raises questions about its current market standing. Are you comfortable choosing a system with a proven track record, or are you willing to risk less-tested software?
In sum, eviivo’s recent, plentiful user feedback and high satisfaction scores suggest it’s better suited for hoteliers seeking reliability and ongoing support. Winner PMS, with no recent reviews, remains an uncertain option for your hotel.
If your hotel needs a flexible, easy-to-use PMS with strong integrations, eviivo is the clear pick. It caters well to independent hotels, B&Bs, and vacation rentals looking for a platform with extensive features, including channel management, guest CRM, automation, and revenue management—51 unique features in total.
If your hotel requires a straightforward, centralized operational tool and is comfortable with a less established provider, Winner PMS could be considered. However, given its limited review data and absence of recent user feedback, it’s less advisable unless your team is prepared to handle potential uncertainties.
For most hoteliers, especially smaller and independent properties, eviivo’s comprehensive feature set and proven track record outweigh Winner PMS’s claims of centralization. The choice is evident: eviivo provides more value through its established presence, features, and user satisfaction.
eviivo’s platform is rated 4.43 out of 5 for ease of use, with a strong onboarding process rated at 4.38. Users frequently mention its intuitive interface, straightforward management, and helpful onboarding support. The mobile app further enhances usability, enabling management from anywhere, with positive reviews highlighting how it simplifies daily tasks.
Winner PMS, however, has no publicly available ratings or recent user reviews to evaluate its usability or onboarding process. Without this data, we cannot confidently attest to its ease of use or ease of adoption.
Edge: eviivo. Its high usability rating, extensive positive reviews, and mobile app provide a more user-friendly experience for your team.
eviivo boasts 51 features exclusive to its platform, including a channel manager, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, automated messaging, online check-in/out, and integrated payment processing. These features cover virtually all operational needs for small to mid-sized hotels and rentals, with continuous updates and integrations.
Winner PMS offers core reservation, check-in, billing, and housekeeping features but lacks the extensive customization and automation tools found in eviivo. Importantly, it has no unique features listed beyond basic functionalities.
Edge: eviivo. Its broad feature set, including advanced automation and guest communication tools, makes it the more comprehensive option.
eviivo’s customer support is highly rated at 4.42 out of 5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and helpfulness. Support staff are praised for guiding users through onboarding and resolving issues swiftly, which enhances confidence and smooth operation.
There are no recent reviews or detailed feedback available for Winner PMS’s customer support. The lack of public ratings or testimonials suggests it may not match eviivo’s level of service and reliability.
Edge: eviivo. Its high support ratings and positive customer feedback make it a safer choice for your team’s operational stability.
eviivo integrates with 32 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, VRBO, and industry tools like TripAdvisor and D-Edge. Its extensive partner network ensures your property can reach wide audiences with synchronized rates and availability.
Winner PMS has only one verified partner listed—Mews—and no other integration data is available. This limited connectivity could hinder your ability to connect with key distribution channels or management tools.
Edge: eviivo. Its broad and verified integrations support your hotel’s distribution and operational needs more effectively.
eviivo’s recent reviews consistently rate it highly, with a 95% likelihood of recommendation and a user rating of 4.43/5 for ease of use and 4.42/5 for support. The hotel segments most satisfied include vacation rentals, B&Bs, and small hotels, with many users praising its simplicity and customer service.
In contrast, Winner PMS lacks recent reviews, making it impossible to determine current user satisfaction or property segment ratings. Without recent feedback, it’s safer to trust eviivo’s established reputation.
Edge: eviivo. Its higher, recent review counts and ratings confirm a stronger endorsement from the hotel community.
eviivo charges a flat monthly fee of $700 with no implementation or trial fees. This covers access to its extensive features, support, and updates, making it straightforward to budget for the platform.
Winner PMS’s pricing details are unavailable, which complicates direct comparison. The lack of transparent pricing suggests it may not be as accessible or scalable for smaller properties.
Given the transparent, fixed cost of eviivo, it offers clear value for your investment.
eviivo Suite is a well-established, feature-rich PMS trusted by nearly 200 hotels, with recent reviews showing high satisfaction. Its ease of use, strong support, and broad integrations make it the superior choice for most small to mid-sized hotels.
Winner PMS has potential in operational centralization but currently lacks recent user feedback or verified integrations, making it a less reliable option without further validation. If your hotel values proven performance and ongoing support, eviivo stands out as the clear leader.
In summary, if your hotel needs a trusted, full-featured PMS with extensive reviews and recent positive feedback, eviivo is the safer, more proven option. Choose Winner PMS only if you have specific, untested requirements and are prepared for a higher risk.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, eviivo Suite™ PMS and Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Eviivo's customer support is frequently lauded for its responsiveness and efficiency. Support staff, such as Mr. Guetif, Joseph, and Xavier, provide e... Eviivo's customer support is frequently lauded for its responsiveness and efficiency. Support staff, such as Mr. Guetif, Joseph, and Xavier, provide exemplary assistance, which is crucial during the onboarding phase and when issues arise, enhancing overall user experience.
The platform offers expertise during the onboarding process, helping hotels integrate the system seamlessly. This guidance ensures consistent integrat... The platform offers expertise during the onboarding process, helping hotels integrate the system seamlessly. This guidance ensures consistent integration of information and optimal use of the PMS features, enhancing property management efficiency.
Eviivo is recognized for its technical efficiency, enabling users to complete tasks faster and with fewer errors. This reduces downtime and improves o... Eviivo is recognized for its technical efficiency, enabling users to complete tasks faster and with fewer errors. This reduces downtime and improves operational workflow, ensuring a smooth experience for hotel management.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users suggest improvements, particularly in expanding features such as mobile app development and more concrete daily usage tips to further optim... Some users suggest improvements, particularly in expanding features such as mobile app development and more concrete daily usage tips to further optimize business operations and leverage the platform’s capabilities.
While users are generally satisfied, there are requests for more customization options, including web and mobile app enhancements, which would further... While users are generally satisfied, there are requests for more customization options, including web and mobile app enhancements, which would further suit specific operational needs and provide additional value.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. eviivo Suite™ PMS and Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. eviivo Suite™ PMS offers 32 verified integration partners, while Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. eviivo Suite™ PMS leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
eviivo Suite™ PMS: No. Winner PMS (acquired by Mews): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. eviivo has an HT Score of 87 and Winner Hotel Software has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor