The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 208 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
eviivo shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Vacation Rentals & Villas properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
ZHARA shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 208 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 208 | 0 |
After analyzing 208 verified reviews, eviivo users most value its responsive customer support, onboarding expertise, technical efficiency, while ZHARA users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Responsive Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding Expertise
▾
|
|
|
+
Technical Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking and Reservation Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Improvement Suggestions
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Feature Development
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #15 54 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #23 23 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #20 8 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #18 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #19 41 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #16 38 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #19 21 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #10 18 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #15 39 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #6 142 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #33 2 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #29 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ PMS by eviivo and ZHARA hinges on what your hotel needs most. eviivo is a full-featured property management system with a longstanding track record and extensive recent reviews; ZHARA offers advanced revenue management capabilities but lacks recent user feedback or verified reviews. Do you prioritize a proven, all-in-one PMS or cutting-edge pricing optimization?
Both products aim to streamline hotel operations, but their core strengths differ. eviivo provides a comprehensive platform for reservations, guest communication, and operational management. ZHARA focuses on pricing strategies and revenue maximization through AI analytics. Which aligns better with your current priorities?
eviivo is clearly more established, with over 191 reviews in the past six months and a high 87.05 HTR Score, signaling strong user confidence. ZHARA has zero recent reviews or verified user feedback, making it impossible to gauge its current performance and user satisfaction. Given the recent review activity and high ratings, eviivo’s platform is more proven and reliable for hoteliers seeking a comprehensive PMS.
Both products target different hotel segments: eviivo supports a wide range—including B&Bs, vacation rentals, and boutique hotels—while ZHARA’s focus on revenue management may appeal primarily to properties with complex pricing needs. Do you need a full operational platform or specialized revenue tools? That distinction clarifies the choice.
eviivo’s ease of use is rated 4.43 out of 5, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and mobile app. Support staff are recognized for delivering responsive, expert assistance, which is crucial during implementation and daily use. Conversely, ZHARA offers no user ratings or feedback, leaving its usability unverified.
Given the detailed positive feedback for eviivo’s user experience and onboarding process, it’s clearly more accessible for your team to adopt and operate confidently. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo boasts 51 unique features, including a channel manager, booking engine, revenue management, guest CRM, automated messaging, and more—more than enough tools to manage a busy property. ZHARA offers no listed features, only emphasizing AI-driven revenue insights, which are valuable but not a complete property management solution.
If your hotel needs an all-in-one platform that handles reservations, guest communication, and operations, eviivo’s feature set is unmatched. For properties seeking advanced pricing algorithms alone, ZHARA might be relevant, but the lack of detailed features makes eviivo the clearer choice. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s support ratings are excellent, with a 4.42 out of 5 score and specific praise for responsive, knowledgeable assistance. Recent reviews mention that their customer service is a key factor in successful onboarding and ongoing use, especially for less tech-savvy users. ZHARA has no available reviews or verified customer support ratings, making it impossible to compare.
Since support quality directly impacts your hotel’s ability to maximize software benefits, eviivo’s strong service levels give it a definitive advantage. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo integrates with 32 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, and Airbnb, plus hotel-specific solutions such as experience booking and guest communication tools. ZHARA currently has no verified integrations listed, limiting its connectivity.
For hotels relying on a broad distribution network and seamless operational integrations, eviivo offers a clear advantage. Its extensive partner ecosystem ensures you can connect your existing tools and channels without hassle. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s recent reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 95% likelihood to recommend, and a total review count of 191, including 20 in the last six months. Reviewers highlight its ease of use, extensive features, and excellent support across diverse property types.
ZHARA lacks any recent reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to assess hotel satisfaction or segment-specific feedback. Given the recent activity and high scores for eviivo, it’s the hotelier’s preferred choice based on proven performance. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s pricing starts at $700 per month, with no free tier, trial, or implementation fee. Its pricing model appears straightforward for its feature set. ZHARA’s pricing details are not publicly available, leaving uncertainty about costs or value.
Without transparent pricing for ZHARA, eviivo’s clear, predictable fee structure makes budgeting easier. If value for money is critical, eviivo’s established pricing and features justify the investment. Edge: eviivo.
Not ideal if your hotel primarily needs a simple, standalone reservation tool without extensive operational features or multi-property management.
Not ideal if you need a full property management system, guest communication features, or verified support and reviews.
eviivo Suite™ is a comprehensive, well-supported property management platform trusted by thousands of accommodations worldwide. Its extensive feature set, recent positive reviews, and high user satisfaction make it the clear choice for most hotels looking to streamline operations and improve guest experience.
ZHARA offers specialized revenue management, leveraging AI to optimize pricing, but the lack of recent reviews, verified support, and detailed features leaves its real-world effectiveness uncertain. If your hotel prioritizes operational management, eviivo’s proven platform is the safer, more reliable investment.
Use eviivo if you want a trusted, full-featured PMS with excellent support and integrations. Turn to ZHARA only if you already have a PMS in place and need advanced revenue tools, understanding the current lack of user validation.
In conclusion, for most hoteliers seeking a reliable, feature-rich system, eviivo’s recent reviews and extensive capabilities make it the stronger choice.
According to HTR's product database, eviivo Suite™ PMS and ZHARA share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Eviivo's customer support is frequently lauded for its responsiveness and efficiency. Support staff, such as Mr. Guetif, Joseph, and Xavier, provide e... Eviivo's customer support is frequently lauded for its responsiveness and efficiency. Support staff, such as Mr. Guetif, Joseph, and Xavier, provide exemplary assistance, which is crucial during the onboarding phase and when issues arise, enhancing overall user experience.
The platform offers expertise during the onboarding process, helping hotels integrate the system seamlessly. This guidance ensures consistent integrat... The platform offers expertise during the onboarding process, helping hotels integrate the system seamlessly. This guidance ensures consistent integration of information and optimal use of the PMS features, enhancing property management efficiency.
Eviivo is recognized for its technical efficiency, enabling users to complete tasks faster and with fewer errors. This reduces downtime and improves o... Eviivo is recognized for its technical efficiency, enabling users to complete tasks faster and with fewer errors. This reduces downtime and improves operational workflow, ensuring a smooth experience for hotel management.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users suggest improvements, particularly in expanding features such as mobile app development and more concrete daily usage tips to further optim... Some users suggest improvements, particularly in expanding features such as mobile app development and more concrete daily usage tips to further optimize business operations and leverage the platform’s capabilities.
While users are generally satisfied, there are requests for more customization options, including web and mobile app enhancements, which would further... While users are generally satisfied, there are requests for more customization options, including web and mobile app enhancements, which would further suit specific operational needs and provide additional value.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. eviivo Suite™ PMS and ZHARA share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. eviivo Suite™ PMS offers 32 verified integration partners, while ZHARA offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. eviivo Suite™ PMS leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
eviivo Suite™ PMS: No. ZHARA: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. eviivo has an HT Score of 87 and ZHARA has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor