The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 178 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Faster Housekeeping, LLC shines .
hub OS shines in ROI — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile Access.
Side-by-side ratings based on 178 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 1 | 177 |
After analyzing 178 verified reviews, Faster Housekeeping, LLC users most value its , while hub OS users highlight efficiency in task management, customization options, housekeeping module. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Efficiency in task management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization options
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping module
▾
|
|
|
+
Maintenance module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration with PMS
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Housekeeping Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #18 0 reviews | #5 13 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #18 1 reviews | #4 85 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #21 0 reviews | #2 62 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #15 0 reviews | #5 9 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #18 1 reviews | #4 74 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #21 0 reviews | #3 73 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #22 0 reviews | #2 70 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #21 0 reviews | #8 11 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #14 1 reviews | #8 10 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #3 132 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #8 1 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #2 7 reviews |
Choosing between Faster Housekeeping and hub OS Housekeeping hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational goals. Both products aim to streamline housekeeping management, but they differ significantly in features, user base, and support structure. Faster Housekeeping emphasizes simplicity and cost savings, while hub OS offers a broader suite of integrations and departmental connectivity.
Your decision should consider the scope of your operations, the importance of real-time data, and the level of customization needed. Are you seeking a straightforward solution or a comprehensive management platform?
Faster Housekeeping specializes in reducing housekeeping costs by digitalizing core processes and managing staff efficiently. In contrast, hub OS provides a more extensive system that connects multiple departments, including maintenance, front desk, and quality control.
Both products aim to improve productivity, but Faster Housekeeping’s singular focus on housekeeping processes means it’s optimized for hotels looking for an easy-to-implement, budget-conscious solution. Does your hotel need a simple housekeeping tool or an integrated platform for multiple operational areas?
If your hotel operates primarily in the limited-service segment seeking a straightforward, cost-effective housekeeping solution, Faster Housekeeping is the better fit. With a perfect 5/5 rating from one review and a single review in total, it’s praised by hoteliers for its ease of use and effective management.
Meanwhile, if your hotel requires comprehensive integration with multiple systems, detailed reporting, and department-wide communication, hub OS should be your choice. Its 161 reviews with a high overall rating of 4.88/5 and recent feedback highlight its robustness and wide adoption in various hotel types.
Faster Housekeeping scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, reflecting its straightforward interface designed by hotel housekeeping managers. Its onboarding process is rated 5/5, with reviews highlighting how quickly staff adopt the system.
hub OS, while highly rated at 4.86/5 for usability and 4.76/5 for onboarding, offers more complex features that can require some learning. Multiple reviews mention the platform’s user-friendly design but note occasional delays and a learning curve with advanced modules.
Edge: Faster Housekeeping.
Faster Housekeeping offers a streamlined set of core features—managing staff, tracking performance, and scheduling tasks—without additional modules. Conversely, hub OS includes 12 shared features plus 6 unique functionalities such as open API, inspection modules, mobile access, chat, and custom checklists.
The added features in hub OS facilitate more detailed inspections, communication, and customization, making it suitable for hotels with complex operational needs. If comprehensive departmental integration and advanced inspection tools are priorities, hub OS holds the edge.
Edge: hub OS.
Both products boast high support ratings—Faster Housekeeping at a perfect 5/5 and hub OS at 4.8/5. Users of Faster Housekeeping mention excellent responsiveness and a smooth onboarding experience, often praising the vendor’s proactive communication.
hub OS support is consistently lauded for responsiveness, with reviews emphasizing their helpfulness and quick resolution of issues. However, some users note that support can sometimes be slower during peak times or when requesting complex customizations.
Edge: Faster Housekeeping.
Faster Housekeeping has no verified integrations listed, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems out of the box. In contrast, hub OS integrates with 23 verified partners, including PMS systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Opera, as well as tools like HiJiffy and Signify.
These integrations enable seamless data flow across departments, reducing manual entry and errors. If your hotel relies heavily on integrations with existing systems, hub OS’s extensive partner network offers a clear advantage.
Edge: hub OS.
Faster Housekeeping, despite only a single recent review, received a perfect 5/5 rating, with users praising its effectiveness and ease of use. Its limited review count makes it hard to gauge broader satisfaction, but this high score indicates strong user confidence.
hub OS, with 142 reviews in the last six months, boasts an impressive 4.88/5 overall rating. Users across various hotel segments, from luxury to boutique and resorts, consistently praise its functionality, reporting significant improvements in productivity and communication.
Edge: hub OS.
Faster Housekeeping does not publicly list pricing, leaving potential buyers to inquire directly. This lack of transparency may suggest custom quotes based on hotel size and needs.
hub OS charges a flat monthly fee of $300, with no additional implementation or per-room charges. This predictable pricing model makes budgeting easier, especially for mid-sized to large hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel requires departmental integration, detailed reporting, or extensive customization.
Not ideal if your hotel operates on a very small scale or prefers a lightweight, single-function solution.
Faster Housekeeping provides a simple, highly-rated solution for hotels focused on core housekeeping functions without extra complexity. Its 5/5 user rating and ease of onboarding make it ideal for hotels that want quick results without extensive setup.
hub OS, with its broad feature set, integrations, and high recent ratings, suits hotels looking for a comprehensive operational platform. It excels in environments that benefit from department-wide communication, detailed reporting, and automation.
Choose Faster Housekeeping if your focus is on straightforward housekeeping management and cost savings. Opt for hub OS when your hotel needs a connected, feature-rich system capable of supporting complex operations and multiple departments.
In summary, both products have their strengths, but the recent data clearly favors hub OS for hotels seeking an extensive, integrated solution. Its higher number of reviews, broader feature set, and deeper market presence make it the more reliable choice in today’s competitive landscape.
Housekeeping Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Faster Housekeeping and hub OS Housekeeping share 12 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Chat | ||
| Custom Inspection Checklists | ||
| Inspection Module | ||
| Mobile Access | ||
| Multi Language UI Support | ||
| Open API |
What hoteliers love
Hub OS significantly increases task management efficiency across departments like housekeeping, maintenance, and front desk. The system improves commu... Hub OS significantly increases task management efficiency across departments like housekeeping, maintenance, and front desk. The system improves communication, task delegation, and tracking, leading to more streamlined operations and higher productivity. A few reviews, however, point to areas where additional features could enhance task management further.
While Hub OS is appreciated for its flexibility and customization capabilities, several users note that certain customizations and personalized settin... While Hub OS is appreciated for its flexibility and customization capabilities, several users note that certain customizations and personalized settings are challenging to achieve without technical support. There is a desire for more self-servicing options within the software, especially related to the mobile app and user interface.
The housekeeping module of Hub OS receives high praise as a game-changer, drastically improving efficiency and productivity. It enables staff to see r... The housekeeping module of Hub OS receives high praise as a game-changer, drastically improving efficiency and productivity. It enables staff to see room statuses, report issues promptly, and manage tasks effectively. Several reviews specifically mention that the system helps maintain high housekeeping cleanliness scores.
Where hoteliers push back
Hub OS is highly praised for its seamless integration with Property Management Systems (PMS), making it easier to manage various hotel operations like... Hub OS is highly praised for its seamless integration with Property Management Systems (PMS), making it easier to manage various hotel operations like housekeeping and maintenance efficiently in one place. Nonetheless, some reviews mention occasional delays and issues with syncing integrations, specifically with systems such as SAP and Opera.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Faster Housekeeping and hub OS Housekeeping share many core Housekeeping Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Faster Housekeeping offers 0 verified integration partners, while hub OS Housekeeping offers 23. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Faster Housekeeping leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.9/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Faster Housekeeping: No. hub OS Housekeeping: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Housekeeping Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Faster Housekeeping, LLC has an HT Score of 0 and hub OS has 34. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor