The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 83 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
feratel media technologies AG shines , with exclusive features like Stripe.
roommaster shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Urgency messaging and Automated reporting.
Side-by-side ratings based on 83 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 83 |
After analyzing 83 verified reviews, feratel media technologies AG users most value its , while roommaster users highlight user-friendly design, secure automated transactions, ai chatbox for web booking. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-friendly Design
▾
|
|
|
+
Secure Automated Transactions
▾
|
|
|
+
AI Chatbox for Web Booking
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Processing Fees
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #16 29 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #14 33 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #21 6 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #26 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #16 33 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #34 8 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #20 14 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #22 4 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #4 61 reviews |
| Europe | — | #32 3 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #24 0 reviews |
Choosing between the Feratel Booking Engine (IBE) and Roommaster’s booking engine hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both products aim to increase direct bookings, but they approach this goal differently. Feratel’s solution is more localized, primarily serving European markets, while Roommaster boasts a broader global presence with more recent reviews. Your decision should weigh factors like platform familiarity, feature depth, and support quality.
Feratel offers a straightforward booking widget integrated with its Destination Management System, emphasizing ease of use within tourism networks. Roommaster’s solution is a highly customizable platform with extensive features and a more established presence in North America and beyond. Do you prioritize regional integration or feature richness?
Feratel’s booking engine is designed for hotels already using its Deskline 3.0 system, making it ideal if you want a simple, integrated widget for direct bookings on your website. It excels in providing a responsive display, multiple language support, and package offerings—fitting for hotels within tourism networks or those seeking GDPR compliance.
Roommaster’s booking engine is better suited for hotels seeking a comprehensive, customizable platform with a wide array of features, from loyalty programs to multi-currency support. Its broader integration ecosystem and proven track record in North America make it ideal for hotels aiming to increase direct reservations and improve operational efficiency.
If you need a quick, easy-to-implement solution within a specific system, Feratel is your choice. If your goal is feature depth, customization, and a global reach, Roommaster wins. Which approach aligns with your hotel’s strategic priorities?
Feratel’s booking widget is praised for its simplicity, especially for hotels already familiar with its Deskline system. However, review data is scarce, and user feedback on ease of onboarding is limited, making it difficult to gauge overall usability.
Roommaster’s platform garners a 4.43/5 rating for ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface and quick staff onboarding. The platform’s mobile access and straightforward back-office features help hotel teams adopt it with minimal training.
Edge: Roommaster.
Roommaster offers 23 unique features, including advanced modules like loyalty program integration, multi-currency support, automated reporting, and A/B testing. It also supports multi-room bookings, social media integration, and booking abandonment recapture—features that Feratel lacks.
Feratel’s system includes only one exclusive feature: Stripe integration, which facilitates secure online payments. While its core booking widget is functional, it lacks the extensive customization and marketing tools found in Roommaster.
Edge: Roommaster.
Roommaster’s support receives a solid 4.16/5 rating, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses and reliable ongoing support. Users appreciate its responsive sales team and ease of troubleshooting, though some note room for improvement in training and response times.
Feratel’s support score is unavailable, and no recent reviews provide insight into its customer service quality. Its limited review activity (zero reviews in the last six months) suggests less recent engagement or transparency.
Edge: Roommaster.
Roommaster boasts 56 verified partners, including major PMS, channel managers, and OTAs like Sage, GuestCentric, and Otelier. Its extensive integration ecosystem covers a broad range of services, enabling more comprehensive property technology setups.
Feratel’s system integrates with 13 verified partners, primarily focused on European tourism and booking solutions, including RoomRaccoon and Profitroom. Its narrower scope limits integration options for hotels needing a more interconnected tech environment.
Edge: Roommaster.
Roommaster’s overall rating of 4.31/5 is based on 70 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its user-friendliness and operational benefits. Hoteliers across different segments, including boutique and resort hotels, rate its features and support favorably.
Feratel, with a rating of 0/5 and no recent reviews, provides no current data to support positive ratings. Its limited market presence and lack of recent feedback make Roommaster the clearer choice among hoteliers.
Edge: Roommaster.
Feratel’s booking widget is available for $100 monthly, with no trial or implementation fees, making it an affordable option for small to medium hotels.
Roommaster’s pricing starts at $500 per month, reflecting its broader feature set and customization capabilities. No trial information is available, but its higher cost corresponds to the extensive functionality offered.
Not ideal if you need a highly customizable platform or operate outside feratel’s regional focus.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a simple, low-cost booking widget or operates in regions where Roommaster’s presence is limited.
The core difference lies in scope: Feratel offers a niche, straightforward booking widget within its tourism ecosystem, while Roommaster provides a full-featured, customizable booking engine with extensive integrations. If your hotel values simplicity and regional focus, Feratel may suffice.
Choose Feratel if you want a budget-friendly, easy-to-deploy widget, especially if already within its ecosystem. Opt for Roommaster if you seek depth, customization, and a global presence that can support growth and operational complexity.
Roommaster’s broader feature set and recent reviews make it the stronger overall choice, especially for hotels prioritizing direct bookings and operational efficiency. Feratel’s limited recent activity and feature set suggest it’s better suited for specific, localized applications rather than comprehensive hotel management.
Your decision should align with your hotel’s technical landscape and growth ambitions. Roommaster’s current review volume and recent positive feedback make it a more reliable, scalable choice for most hoteliers looking to boost direct reservations. Feratel’s booking widget may be useful for smaller or regionally focused properties, but it falls short in feature depth and support reputation.
If you need a versatile, well-supported platform with a proven track record, Roommaster is the clear leader. For those seeking a simple, budget-friendly booking solution within a European tourism network, Feratel remains a viable, if limited, option.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Feratel Booking Engine (IBE) and roommaster booking engine share 9 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| A/B testing & optimization | ||
| Automated reporting | ||
| Pooled inventory | ||
| Stripe | ||
| Tariffs | ||
| Urgency messaging | ||
| Wedding & corporate booking modules |
Showing top differences. 12 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
The booking engine's interface is praised for its simplicity, allowing hotel staff to learn and navigate the system efficiently. The intuitive layout... The booking engine's interface is praised for its simplicity, allowing hotel staff to learn and navigate the system efficiently. The intuitive layout enhances overall user experience, contributing to increased adoption and satisfaction among users.
Secure transactions are highlighted as a key strength, supporting seamless bookings and safeguarding guest data. This feature minimizes reliance on th... Secure transactions are highlighted as a key strength, supporting seamless bookings and safeguarding guest data. This feature minimizes reliance on third-party booking platforms, thereby increasing direct revenue streams.
There's an optimistic expectation regarding the integration of AI chat capabilities in the booking engine. This feature is expected to enhance guest e... There's an optimistic expectation regarding the integration of AI chat capabilities in the booking engine. This feature is expected to enhance guest experience by providing instant, intelligent interactions during the booking process.
Where hoteliers push back
While the secure automation of transactions is appreciated, the costs associated with processing fees are identified as a concern. Users suggest the n... While the secure automation of transactions is appreciated, the costs associated with processing fees are identified as a concern. Users suggest the need for cost reduction to enhance the engine's value proposition.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Feratel Booking Engine (IBE) and roommaster booking engine share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Feratel Booking Engine (IBE) offers 13 verified integration partners, while roommaster booking engine offers 56. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. roommaster booking engine leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Feratel Booking Engine (IBE): No. roommaster booking engine: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. feratel media technologies AG has an HT Score of 0 and roommaster has 81. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor