The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 115 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
feratel media technologies AG shines , with exclusive features like Multi-Currency Support.
HotelRunner shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Email Marketing and Data Analysis & Reporting.
Side-by-side ratings based on 115 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 115 |
After analyzing 115 verified reviews, feratel media technologies AG users most value its , while HotelRunner users highlight multi-channel management, support and reliability, ease of use. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Multi-channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Reliability
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time Updates
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Interface Improvements
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #12 40 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 22 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #10 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #15 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #7 51 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #10 31 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #14 17 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #12 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #19 1 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #14 16 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #13 8 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #2 63 reviews |
Choosing between feratel Deskline 3.0 and HotelRunner Channel Manager hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both products aim to streamline your online distribution and reservation management, but they diverge significantly in user experience, features, and market presence. Your decision should consider how each platform aligns with your hotel's size, market focus, and technological maturity.
While feratel Deskline 3.0 offers a specialized, integrated system primarily targeted at tourism organizations, HotelRunner provides a versatile, user-friendly channel management solution favored by a broad range of property types. Which system will best support your hotel’s growth?
feratel Deskline 3.0 has been in the market since 1978 and is used mainly by tourism organizations and affiliated accommodation providers in Europe. It offers a comprehensive booking solution with integrated channel management capabilities, functioning like a Property Management System (PMS) and focusing heavily on distribution through its Destination Management System.
HotelRunner, founded in 2011, boasts a more recent and widely reviewed platform, with over 100 reviews, mostly positive. Its channel manager emphasizes ease of use, real-time updates, and broad integration, appealing to hotels seeking rapid deployment and scalable features. With a 4.78-star rating and a strong customer support score, HotelRunner’s recent reviews show robust user confidence.
In essence, feratel provides a highly specialized, enterprise-level platform suited for tourism boards and regional distribution. HotelRunner offers a flexible, hotel-focused solution ideal for properties seeking ease of operation and broad channel connectivity. Are you looking for a dedicated, integrated PMS with a focus on distribution, or a versatile, easy-to-manage channel manager?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, quick-to-implement system that simplifies multi-channel management, HotelRunner is the better choice. Its user-friendly interface, extensive integrations, and strong customer support make it ideal for boutique hotels, B&Bs, and mid-sized properties looking to expand their online presence rapidly.
On the other hand, if your hotel operates within a tourism region or requires a system that acts as both PMS and channel manager with deep integration capabilities, feratel Deskline 3.0 may be the right fit. It’s especially suited for organizations that prioritize comprehensive distribution management and automated content updates, but it’s less accessible for hotels seeking minimal setup.
In summary, choose HotelRunner if you want a fast, reliable solution with high user ratings and broad integrations. Opt for feratel if you need a specialized platform backed by decades of experience, primarily serving regional tourism markets. Which features are most critical to your hotel's growth?
HotelRunner receives a 4.7/5 ease of use rating, with recent reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward setup process. Customers often mention the helpful support team, especially during initial onboarding, with one reviewer praising Patricia for her excellent guidance.
In contrast, feratel Deskline 3.0 scores a 0/5 on ease of use, reflecting its complexity and specialized focus. Reviews indicate it’s geared more towards technical teams within tourism organizations rather than individual hoteliers, and onboarding can be challenging.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner offers 15 unique features, including email marketing, web development, social media management, inventory management, and detailed analytics dashboards. Its extensive feature set covers many marketing and operational needs that feratel does not address.
Feratel provides only 1 feature exclusive to its platform — multi-currency support — which is more relevant for large regional operators and tourism boards. Its core strength lies in distribution and content API integrations but lacks marketing tools found in HotelRunner.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner’s support ratings are highly positive, with an average score of 4.7/5 and recent reviews praising prompt, helpful assistance. Customers note that support teams quickly resolve issues, and onboarding is smooth, often citing personalized sessions.
feratel’s support information is limited, with no recent reviews available, making it difficult to assess user satisfaction. Its customer support ratings are effectively zero in the data, indicating a lack of recent feedback or potentially less accessible support.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner connects with 17 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Airbnb, and Agoda, plus property management systems like protel and Hotelogix. Shared partners include Planet, and its broad ecosystem supports extensive distribution options.
Feratel has 13 verified partners, with some notable integrations like TravelLine and Mews, but fewer high-profile OTAs and property systems. Its integrations are more regional and specialized, primarily serving European markets.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner’s reviews show an average rating of 4.78/5, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use and reliable operation. Hoteliers across varied segments, especially boutique and B&B properties, appreciate its quick setup and support.
There are no recent reviews for feratel, but historically, its user base is smaller and more specialized, likely rating it based on regional distribution needs rather than overall usability.
Edge: HotelRunner.
Both products are priced at a base rate of $100 per month, with no additional implementation or setup fees. Feratel’s pricing details are limited, but it appears to be geared towards larger organizations, possibly with additional costs for customization.
HotelRunner offers transparent pricing, with no hidden fees, making it accessible for small to mid-sized hotels. Its value is reflected in the broad feature set and ease of deployment.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference between feratel Deskline 3.0 and HotelRunner Channel Manager lies in their target audiences and feature depth. feratel is a specialized platform designed for regional tourism organizations and large-scale distribution, while HotelRunner offers a user-friendly, flexible solution favored by a broad range of hotels.
If your hotel values ease of use, recent positive reviews, and broad integrations, HotelRunner is the better choice. Its high customer satisfaction score, extensive features, and global presence clearly outperform feratel’s limited recent feedback.
However, if your operation is regionally focused, operates within the European tourism sector, and needs a combined PMS and distribution platform, feratel may serve your needs better. Still, for most hotels looking to grow online efficiently, HotelRunner’s recent reviews and higher ratings make it the recommended platform.
In conclusion, HotelRunner provides a modern, scalable, and well-supported channel management solution that aligns with today’s hotel industry demands. feratel remains a strong, niche choice for specific regional distribution needs but lacks the recent feedback and broad appeal that make HotelRunner the clear leader.
Channel Managers pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $100/mo |
According to HTR's product database, feratel Deskline 3.0 and HotelRunner Channel Manager share 9 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Conversion Rate Optimization | ||
| Data Analysis & Reporting | ||
| Email Marketing | ||
| Meta search marketing | ||
| Multi-Currency Support | ||
| Web Design | ||
| Web Development |
Showing top differences. 4 more features differ between these products.
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users praise HotelRunner for its ability to manage multiple booking channels seamlessly from a single platform. This feature is specifically highlight... Users praise HotelRunner for its ability to manage multiple booking channels seamlessly from a single platform. This feature is specifically highlighted as beneficial during peak seasons, reducing workload and human error while ensuring all channels are up-to-date.
Quick access to support and reliable operation are often underlined in reviews. Users experience prompt responses when assistance is needed, ensuring... Quick access to support and reliable operation are often underlined in reviews. Users experience prompt responses when assistance is needed, ensuring smooth operations without major disruptions.
Customers frequently mention the user-friendly nature of the system, particularly noting the convenience of controlling and sending prices across mult... Customers frequently mention the user-friendly nature of the system, particularly noting the convenience of controlling and sending prices across multiple channels. This ease of use is a significant advantage for hotel staff dealing with daily operations.
Where hoteliers push back
Some reviews suggest minor improvements to the interface could be beneficial. While the system generally meets expectations, enhancing the interface c... Some reviews suggest minor improvements to the interface could be beneficial. While the system generally meets expectations, enhancing the interface could further streamline operations.
A common point of criticism is the speed of the updating process. Even though it is working smoothly, some users feel it could be faster to enhance ef... A common point of criticism is the speed of the updating process. Even though it is working smoothly, some users feel it could be faster to enhance efficiency during operations.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. feratel Deskline 3.0 and HotelRunner Channel Manager share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. feratel Deskline 3.0 offers 13 verified integration partners, while HotelRunner Channel Manager offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. HotelRunner Channel Manager leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
feratel Deskline 3.0: No. HotelRunner Channel Manager: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. feratel media technologies AG has an HT Score of 0 and HotelRunner has 76. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor