The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 16 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Foxtel (Australia) shines .
Hudini shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest Marketing and Housekeeping Module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 16 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 16 |
How each product ranks among Hospitality TV vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
Foxtel (Australia)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | — | #5 3 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 8 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #4 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
Foxtel (Australia)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | — | #6 4 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #3 15 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #4 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #5 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
Foxtel (Australia)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #4 2 reviews |
| Europe | — | #6 1 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #3 3 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #2 10 reviews |
When selecting a hospitality TV platform, your primary goal is to enhance guest experience without complicating your hotel operations. Both Foxtel (Australia) and Hudini aim to deliver entertainment and guest communication solutions, but they differ significantly in scope, usability, and support. Foxtel, a longstanding media giant, primarily offers a traditional TV content service, while Hudini positions itself as a comprehensive guest engagement platform with a variety of interactive features.
The choice hinges on whether your hotel needs a simple entertainment provider or a versatile in-room engagement system. Do you want to elevate the guest's tech experience with integrated services, or focus solely on premium TV content? Both solve distinct problems, but which suits your hotel best?
Foxtel (Australia) is a well-established media provider known for its cable, satellite, and broadband TV services across Australia. Its core strength is delivering exclusive programming and a reliable channel lineup, especially suited for hotels seeking familiar, traditional entertainment. However, it offers no integrations beyond basic TV content, and reviews indicate no recent updates or new features.
Hudini, by contrast, emphasizes in-room guest engagement through a platform that integrates with many hotel systems and content providers. It boasts 20 features—including on-screen ordering, messaging, wake-up calls, and content streaming—indicating a broader, more interactive approach. With 15 recent reviews averaging a 4.8/5 ease of use and a 9.6/10 NPS, Hudini's recent user feedback is more relevant and positive.
While Foxtel's strengths lie in its longstanding media presence, Hudini’s recent reviews and feature set suggest it offers a more dynamic, guest-centered experience. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s operational goals?
If your hotel needs reliable, high-quality TV content with minimal fuss, Foxtel is the straightforward choice. Its extensive experience in delivering entertainment makes it ideal if you prioritize familiar programming and a simple implementation.
If, however, you require a flexible guest engagement platform that combines content, messaging, and service requests into a single interface, Hudini is the clear winner. Its 20 features—like guest messaging, on-screen orders, and integrations with hotel systems—are designed to boost guest satisfaction and operational efficiency.
Considering reviews, Hudini's recent 15 reviews and 4.8/5 ease of use rating strongly endorse its usability. Foxtel, with no recent reviews or updated ratings, remains a less certain choice outside traditional content delivery.
Hudini’s standout feature is its user-friendly interface, boasting a 4.8/5 ease of use rating based on recent reviews. Guests find it intuitive, and staff note its straightforward onboarding process, with a 4.69/5 onboarding rating. Review quotes indicate guests appreciate quick access to content and services, enhancing their stay.
Foxtel, meanwhile, has no recent review data or usability ratings. Its long-standing presence suggests familiarity but doesn't provide recent insights into ease of use or guest adoption.
Edge: Hudini.
Hudini offers 20 features tailored to guest engagement, such as on-screen purchases, hotel messaging, wake-up calls, content streaming (YouTube, Netflix, Hulu, Pandora), and analytics. These features support personalized guest experiences and streamline hotel operations.
Foxtel, by comparison, provides only traditional TV content without additional interactive features or integrations. Its feature set is limited to delivering entertainment, with no added guest engagement capabilities.
Given Hudini's diverse and numerous features, it clearly surpasses Foxtel. Edge: Hudini.
Recent reviews highlight Hudini’s support, with a 4.73/5 support rating and comments praising swift, knowledgeable assistance. Guests and hotel staff appreciate the proactive communication and dedicated support team, which helps resolve issues quickly.
Foxtel, lacking recent reviews or support ratings, provides no current data on customer service quality. Its long history suggests stability, but recent support experiences remain unknown.
Edge: Hudini.
Hudini integrates with 15 hotel and content partners, including notable names like Dailypoint™, Signify, SALTO Systems, Book4Time, Oracle Hospitality, and more. These integrations enable a seamless guest experience and operational management.
Foxtel has no verified integrations or partnerships listed, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems or content providers.
Edge: Hudini.
With 15 recent reviews, Hudini maintains an average rating of 4.8/5 for ease of use and a 9.6/10 NPS score, reflecting strong guest and hotel staff approval. Reviews mention its intuitive interface, quick support, and broad feature set.
Foxtel has no recent reviews or ratings, making it hard to gauge current satisfaction levels. Its older presence suggests familiarity but lacks recent validation.
Edge: Hudini.
Foxtel does not publish pricing details or offer a trial, implying potentially custom quotes based on content needs. Its pricing model appears less transparent, which could complicate budgeting.
Hudini charges a $900 base fee with no monthly charges, and no trial is available. Its clear pricing makes it easier for hotels to evaluate ROI upfront.
Overall, Hudini provides more transparent, predictable costs.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if your hotel seeks guest engagement features or international content streaming.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if your hotel is only interested in basic cable or satellite TV without additional engagement features.
The fundamental difference is that Foxtel delivers traditional TV entertainment, while Hudini acts as a comprehensive guest engagement platform. If your hotel requires a simple entertainment solution and operates mainly in Australia, Foxtel might suffice.
However, for hotels aiming to enhance guest satisfaction through content, communication, and operational features, Hudini offers a more complete package. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive feature set make it the better choice for most hotels today.
Choosing Hudini means adopting a platform that adapts to modern guest expectations and streamlines staff workflows. Foxtel remains relevant for pure content delivery, but Hudini’s versatility makes it the more future-proof investment.
Summary:
Hudini outperforms Foxtel in usability, features, support, integrations, and recent hotel reviews. Its transparent pricing and global presence give it a distinct advantage for hotels seeking a robust, guest-focused in-room experience. Choose Hudini if you want to modernize your guest engagement; stick with Foxtel if you prefer traditional TV content and operate mainly within Australia.
Hospitality TV pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
Foxtel (Australia)
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Foxtel (Australia) and Hudini TV App share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
Foxtel (Australia)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Guest Marketing | ||
| Guest Messages & Notifications | ||
| Housekeeping Module | ||
| Mini-guide channel banner | ||
| On-screen Purchases & Ordering | ||
| On-screen hotel services |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
Foxtel (Australia)
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We partnered with Hudini to develop a mobile app specifically designed for our hotel guests, and the results have been impressive. The Atlantis Dubai App offers seamless access to..."
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Foxtel (Australia) and Hudini TV App share many core Hospitality TV features, but each has unique capabilities. Foxtel (Australia) offers 0 verified integration partners, while Hudini TV App offers 15. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Hudini TV App leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Foxtel (Australia): No. Hudini TV App: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hospitality TV vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Foxtel (Australia) has an HT Score of 0 and Hudini has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor