The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen shines .
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 47 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Yanolja FrondeskNextgen users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Choosing between Yanolja FrondeskNextgen and Infor HMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both are property management systems (PMS), but they serve vastly different markets and offer distinct features.
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen is a new entrant with no reviews or user feedback yet, primarily promising core functionalities without detailed insights. In contrast, Infor HMS has been in the market since 1999, with 46 reviews and a solid overall rating of 4.04 out of 5, making it a more proven choice for hotels seeking a mature, feature-rich PMS. Are you willing to take a chance on a less established platform or prefer the reliability of a system backed by years of user feedback?
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen is designed to be a straightforward PMS, but with zero reviews or recent feedback, it's impossible to assess its actual performance or user satisfaction. Conversely, Infor HMS has a comprehensive suite of 20 features, including housekeeping, guest profiles, revenue management, and multi-currency support, which have been praised by users for enhancing operational efficiency.
While Infor's system is widely adopted across various hotel segments—including luxury, boutique, and city center hotels—the lack of available data on Yanolja FrondeskNextgen raises questions about its maturity and stability. With no recent reviews, it’s challenging to gauge whether it can deliver consistent value or support your hotel’s growth needs. Do you want to gamble on an untested platform, or lean on a system with proven capabilities?
If your hotel needs a robust, scalable PMS with extensive features—like online support, guest CRM, revenue management, and multi-lingual support—Infor HMS is the clear choice. Its 46 reviews, mostly recent, give it a high rating of 4.04, and users frequently praise its customization and integration capabilities.
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen might appeal if you're looking for a solution with minimal upfront commitment and are comfortable with a product lacking user validation. However, without reviews, it's impossible to confirm whether it offers the same level of reliability or feature depth. For hotels prioritizing proven performance and comprehensive tools, Infor HMS remains the safer, more reliable option.
Based on available data, Infor HMS has a 3.88 out of 5 rating for ease of use, with reviews noting its intuitive navigation and short onboarding process. Support staff are praised for their responsiveness, which helps new users adapt quickly.
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen, with a score of 0 out of 5, offers no user feedback, making it impossible to assess its usability or learning curve. This absence of data suggests it may not yet have established a user-friendly interface or onboarding process. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS provides 20 distinct features, including housekeeping, guest profiles, online support, central management, and revenue modules, making it a comprehensive tool for hotel operations. Its features are tailored to enterprise needs, with customization options and automation capabilities.
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen offers no documented features or modules, which signals a potentially limited or undeveloped product. Without specific functionalities listed, it’s unlikely to match Infor’s extensive feature set right now. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts an average support rating of 4.04 out of 5, with reviews highlighting prompt, professional assistance and solid onboarding. Many users appreciate support staff’s responsiveness during setup and troubleshooting.
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen has no reviews or feedback, making it impossible to evaluate support quality or responsiveness. This lack of data raises concerns about ongoing customer service and issue resolution. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS integrates with 113 verified partners, including major booking platforms, revenue systems, and other operational tools. Its wide partner network allows for seamless data flow and operational flexibility.
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen has no documented integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other systems or platforms. For hotels relying on integrations for efficiency, Infor’s extensive partner ecosystem is a significant advantage. Edge: Infor HMS.
Currently, Yanolja FrondeskNextgen has no reviews, so no rating or user feedback is available. Infor HMS, with 46 reviews, holds a strong overall rating of 4.04, with recent reviews confirming its utility across hotel types.
Property segments like independent hotels and boutique hotels rate Infor HMS higher, with some reviews highlighting its ease of customization and operational support. Given the lack of data for FrondeskNextgen, Infor is clearly the more trusted choice. Edge: Infor HMS.
Both products do not list explicit pricing or subscription models. Infor HMS is typically sold on a custom quote basis, with no upfront costs for the base system or trial info available.
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen also lacks pricing details, which suggests it may still be in development or offering a freemium model. Without clear pricing, it’s difficult to evaluate value; however, Infor’s established model and documented support for large hotels make it easier to budget and plan.
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen might be suitable for early-stage hotels or those wanting a minimal setup, but you should be prepared for potential stability issues or missing functionalities.
Infor HMS fits hotels that want a mature, flexible PMS that can grow with their business and integrate with various operational systems.
The core difference is that Infor HMS is a well-established, feature-rich PMS with a broad integration network, proven support, and proven market presence. Yanolja FrondeskNextgen, however, remains unreviewed, with no user feedback or detailed feature list, making it a risky choice for hotels that need reliability and extensive capabilities.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, flexible, and proven PMS, go with Infor HMS. Its extensive features, support, and integrations justify its reputation among hoteliers worldwide.
If you’re open to testing a new platform with minimal features and are comfortable with potential instability, Yanolja FrondeskNextgen could be an option, but only as a low-risk trial. For now, Infor HMS proves to be the safer, more dependable investment for your hotel’s operational future.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, FrondeskNextgen and Infor HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. FrondeskNextgen and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. FrondeskNextgen offers 0 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
FrondeskNextgen: No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Yanolja FrondeskNextgen has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor