The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 322 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen shines .
RMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 322 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 322 |
After analyzing 322 verified reviews, Yanolja FrondeskNextgen users most value its , while RMS users highlight technical support and learning resources, scalability and feature depth, trust accounting support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Technical Support and Learning Resources
▾
|
|
|
+
Scalability and Feature Depth
▾
|
|
|
+
Trust Accounting Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Online Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine and Mobile Interface
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Writer Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
POS System Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 147 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 102 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 14 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #7 8 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #11 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #13 57 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #9 50 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #3 65 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #11 63 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #23 20 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #12 10 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #8 7 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can dramatically impact your hotel's efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. In this comparison, we evaluate Yanolja FrondeskNextgen and RMS, two platforms aiming to streamline operations and enhance guest experiences. While both systems address core PMS needs, their features, support, and market presence differ significantly. Your decision depends on your hotel's size, complexity, and specific operational requirements.
Both products aim to simplify hotel management, but RMS boasts a broader feature set and a larger user base, making it the more established choice. Will your hotel benefit more from RMS’s extensive capabilities or consider Yanolja FrondeskNextgen’s potentially streamlined approach? Let’s explore.
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen and RMS are designed to address core property management challenges: reservations, guest data, billing, and operational oversight. RMS provides a comprehensive suite with over 74 features, including integrated CRS, booking engine, revenue management, and more, all within a mature platform trusted worldwide. Meanwhile, Yanolja FrondeskNextgen offers a more limited feature set, with no verified integrations and a focus on regional or niche markets.
The key difference lies in the maturity and scope. RMS has been in the market since 1983, supporting thousands of hotels across multiple continents, while Yanolja FrondeskNextgen appears to have limited or no recent reviews, making RMS’s proven reliability more compelling. RMS’s extensive features support complex operations, while Yanolja may appeal to smaller or regional properties. Does your hotel require a well-established platform capable of scaling, or are you exploring a simpler solution?
If your hotel needs a robust, scalable PMS that handles complex operations, RMS is the logical choice. Its broad feature set includes integrated channel management, trust accounting, POS, guest profiles, and revenue management, all backed by over 293 reviews and a 4.56/5 rating. RMS is suited for properties aiming to grow, automate, and deepen guest engagement.
On the other hand, Yanolja FrondeskNextgen’s limited reviews and a 0/5 overall rating suggest it’s less proven. If your hotel is small or regional, with minimal complexity, and you’re open to trial and error, you might consider it. However, RMS’s proven track record and extensive features give it a clear advantage for most hotels seeking reliability and growth.
RMS scores a 4.28/5 in ease of use, with many users praising its user-friendly interface, intuitive reservation charts, and straightforward onboarding. Support staff are also rated highly, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses, and proactive assistance. Many users find RMS’s setup and daily use manageable even without extensive training.
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen, however, scores a 0/5, indicating no available recent reviews on its usability. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to assess whether this product simplifies or complicates hotel management. Given RMS’s high ratings and positive reviews, the edge goes to RMS.
RMS offers 74 unique features, including integrated CRS, online booking, revenue management, guest CRM, POS, and advanced reporting—features critical for dynamic hotel operations. RMS also provides tools for group bookings, multi-currency support, and automated night audits, covering nearly every operational aspect.
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen has no verified features, which suggests a limited or undeclared feature set. The lack of detailed capabilities makes RMS the clear winner, especially for hotels needing comprehensive control and automation.
RMS’s support team is consistently praised for its prompt, knowledgeable assistance, with recent reviews highlighting their quick responses and helpful service. User ratings reflect a 4.48/5 in customer support, indicating high satisfaction and reliable onboarding.
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen, with no recent reviews or support ratings, offers no evidence of support quality. RMS’s established support infrastructure gives it the edge in ensuring your team can get help when needed.
RMS integrates with 112 verified partners, including major channel managers, payment processors, CRM systems, and more. Shared integrations are nonexistent, but RMS’s extensive partner network enhances operational flexibility.
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen reports no verified integrations, limiting its connectivity to other systems. For hotels seeking a flexible, interconnected platform, RMS’s network of integrations makes it the clear choice. Edge: RMS.
RMS boasts a 4.56/5 overall rating based on 293 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its scalability, feature depth, and support quality. Hotels of all sizes, from boutique to large resorts, rate RMS highly, especially for its reliability and comprehensive tools.
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen has no reviews, indicating insufficient data for hotel ratings. Given RMS’s established reputation and recent review volume, RMS is rated significantly higher by hoteliers.
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may not follow a standard model or is under consideration. RMS charges a base fee of $800, with no mention of monthly per-room charges, indicating a straightforward pricing structure, but potentially costly for small hotels.
If budget is a concern, RMS’s $800 base fee might be a barrier for some, but its extensive capabilities justify the investment for scalable, complex properties. Without transparent pricing for Yanolja, RMS’s fee structure remains clearer.
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen may suit properties with minimal operational complexity but falls short for larger or multi-property hotels.
RMS’s broad feature set and proven reliability make it ideal for growing hotels and multi-property groups.
The core difference lies in the maturity and scope: RMS offers a comprehensive, proven platform trusted by thousands worldwide, while Yanolja FrondeskNextgen lacks recent reviews and verified features, suggesting a less mature product.
If your hotel seeks a reliable, feature-rich system capable of supporting growth and complex operations, RMS makes the most sense. It’s especially suitable if you value extensive integrations, support, and scalability.
Conversely, if your property is small, regional, or has minimal operational needs, and you’re open to trial, Yanolja FrondeskNextgen could be an option—though its lack of verified features and reviews makes it a riskier choice.
In conclusion, for most medium to large hotels, RMS’s demonstrated track record, extensive features, and high hotel ratings make it the smarter investment. RMS’s reputation as a trusted platform, combined with recent positive reviews, solidifies its position as the superior choice.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, FrondeskNextgen and RMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 62 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
What hoteliers love
RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learnin... RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learning resources and video tutorials to aid in system navigation and maximize the utility of available features.
RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalabili... RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalability and the rich feature set, including reservation management, reporting, and housekeeping, available out of the box. Such comprehensiveness allows properties to streamline varied operations effectively.
Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates... Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates enhance its capability to manage property trust accounting efficiently, with many noting that this feature significantly reduces operational complexity, thus allowing property managers to focus on other critical tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the bookin... The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the booking process easier and potentially cost-free for returning guests, which could encourage loyalty and repeat business.
While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional... While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional columns to allow faster and more flexible report generation, aiding daily decision-making without needing to reconstruct reports from scratch.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. FrondeskNextgen and RMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. FrondeskNextgen offers 0 verified integration partners, while RMS offers 112. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RMS leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
FrondeskNextgen: No. RMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Yanolja FrondeskNextgen has an HT Score of 0 and RMS has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor