The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 887 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Front2Go shines .
Mews shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 887 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 887 |
After analyzing 887 verified reviews, Front2Go users most value its , while Mews users highlight ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Front2Go |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Front2Go |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 329 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 397 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 45 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #3 49 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Front2Go |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #5 220 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 170 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 130 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Front2Go |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #8 106 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #28 8 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can streamline your operations, enhance guest satisfaction, and ultimately boost revenue. Both Front2Go by Front2Go and Mews PMS aim to address these core needs, but they diverge significantly in scope, maturity, and global presence. Your team needs to evaluate which system aligns best with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans.
Front2Go offers a tailored, customer feedback-focused platform with minimal reviews and no recent activity, while Mews boasts a highly-rated, feature-rich PMS with extensive integrations and a large user base. So, which solution truly supports your hotel’s future?
Front2Go positions itself as a customer feedback management tool, emphasizing sentiment analysis and data-driven insights. It claims to enhance guest experience but lacks comprehensive operational features for day-to-day hotel management. Mews, on the other hand, is a full-fledged cloud PMS designed to automate reservations, billing, guest communications, and more, making it suitable for a wide range of property types.
While Front2Go’s narrow focus may help in understanding customer sentiment, it doesn’t offer the operational tools hotels need for efficiency. Mews’s extensive feature set and recent reviews suggest it’s built for hotel management at scale. Are you looking for a specialized feedback tool or a complete PMS?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, scalable PMS that automates reservations, billing, housekeeping, and integrations, go with Mews. Its 758 reviews and 4.62/5 rating reflect a broad, recent user base of hotels of all sizes, especially boutique and independent hotels seeking digital agility.
If your primary focus is on collecting and analyzing customer feedback without managing operations, Front2Go might seem appealing. However, given its zero reviews and no recent activity, Mews’s proven track record and extensive features make it the clear choice for hotels aiming for operational excellence and growth.
Mews’s UI scores 4.7/5 based on user reviews, with many praising its modern design, intuitive workflows, and seamless onboarding experience. Support ratings at 4.27/5 indicate a strong support system that helps staff adopt the platform quickly.
Front2Go, with a 0/5 ease of use rating and no recent reviews, offers no insight into its user experience. The lack of recent activity suggests it may not prioritize user-friendly design or support. Edge: Mews.
Mews provides over 59 features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, housekeeping, integrated CRS, and more. These features enable hotels to fully digitize and automate their operations, supporting both small and large properties.
Front2Go, with no verified features or integrations, appears limited to feedback management without operational tools. For a hotel seeking a feature-rich PMS, Mews’s extensive capabilities are unmatched. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings at 4.27/5 and an active, responsive support team are well-documented through positive reviews. Users mention rapid support and onboarding, with testimonials praising Mews’s help in smoothing the transition.
Front2Go’s support receives no recent review data, and with no activity or recognition, it’s unlikely to match Mews’s level of service. Given the importance of reliable support, Mews stands out. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 336 verified integrations, including popular tools like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, with a robust API supporting over 1,000 external partners. This broad ecosystem allows your hotel to customize and extend its tech stack.
Front2Go has no verified partners or integrations, limiting its utility beyond feedback. For a dynamic hotel operation that relies on multiple systems, Mews’s extensive ecosystem is decisive. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s 4.62/5 rating and 93% likelihood to recommend reflect widespread satisfaction among hotels across segments like boutique, city center, and hostels. Recent reviews highlight its ease of use, automation, and support as key strengths.
Front2Go has no recent reviews or ratings, indicating very limited validation. For hoteliers seeking proven software with high satisfaction, Mews is clearly preferred. Edge: Mews.
Front2Go’s pricing is unavailable or unspecified, suggesting it might not have a clear or scalable pricing model. Mews charges a $900 base fee, with no additional implementation or monthly per-room fees, making it transparent and predictable.
Given the extensive feature set and active support, Mews’s pricing aligns with its proven value. The lack of pricing details for Front2Go makes it difficult to justify over Mews’s clear and competitive structure.
Front2Go’s limited scope suits niche needs but lacks the operational breadth necessary for most hotels.
Mews’s flexibility and comprehensive features make it suitable for diverse hotel types and growth strategies.
Mews is a scalable, feature-packed PMS that automates core hotel operations, with extensive integrations and a strong reputation. Its recent reviews and high satisfaction scores make it the obvious choice for hotels looking to modernize and grow.
Front2Go’s narrow focus on feedback management may benefit very specific use cases but lacks the operational tools and recent validation to support hotel management at scale. For most hoteliers, Mews offers the agility, features, and support necessary for success.
In conclusion: If you want a trusted, comprehensive PMS that’s rated and supported by hundreds of hotels worldwide, Mews is the clear winner. Front2Go’s niche application limits its utility in today’s competitive hospitality landscape.
According to HTR's product database, Front2Go and Mews PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Front2Go |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 47 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Where hoteliers push back
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting featu... While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting features. Users express the desire for more granular data insights, particularly in reservations and revenue analysis.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Front2Go and Mews PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Front2Go offers 0 verified integration partners, while Mews PMS offers 335. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Mews PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Front2Go: No. Mews PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Front2Go has an HT Score of 0 and Mews has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor