The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
FssNet shines .
Zil Money shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 58 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, FssNet users most value its , while Zil Money users highlight user-friendly interface, customer experience enhancements, payment processing speed. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| FssNet |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Experience Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
+
Payment Processing Speed
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
|
|
−
Approval Process
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | FssNet |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 12 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | FssNet |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #3 15 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 25 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | FssNet |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #3 51 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #3 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #2 1 reviews |
Choosing the right payments processing software for your hotel can significantly impact operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and financial management. Both FssNet by FssNet and Zil Money aim to streamline payments, but they approach this goal differently. FssNet has no recent reviews or ratings, which raises concerns about ongoing support and usability. Conversely, Zil Money boasts a strong recent review profile, with 54 reviews in the last six months and a high NPS score, making it the more reliable option for hoteliers today.
Given the current data, your hotel should favor Zil Money for its proven track record and active user base. But what are the key differences that will influence your decision?
FssNet offers no recent reviews, ratings, or clear feature set, which limits confidence in its performance and support. Its zero reviews in the last six months suggest it might not be actively maintained or widely adopted. On the other hand, Zil Money has a substantial review count—54 in the past six months—and an 87% likelihood of recommendation, indicating strong recent satisfaction among users.
Both products aim to handle hotel payments, but Zil Money offers a broader range of features, including multi-currency settlements and contactless payments, which are crucial for modern hotel operations. The lack of recent feedback for FssNet raises questions about its relevance and reliability. Are you prepared to risk adopting a product without current user validation?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, possibly niche payment tool with no recent support activity, FssNet might be considered, especially if it’s already integrated into your infrastructure. However, for most hotels—especially those prioritizing ease of use, robust features, and active support—Zil Money is the clear choice.
Zil Money’s active user base and recent positive reviews suggest it supports dynamic hotel environments. Its extensive feature list, including payment splitting, contactless options, and multi-currency support, makes it suitable for diverse hotel segments. Conversely, FssNet’s minimal data and no recent updates make it risky for hotels seeking reliable, modern payment solutions. If stability and ongoing support matter, Zil Money is the safer bet.
FssNet scores a 0/5 in ease of use, with no available reviews or indications of a user-friendly interface, onboarding process, or staff adoption. This suggests significant uncertainty about its usability and implementation ease. In contrast, Zil Money has a 4.5/5 rating, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, simplicity, and seamless onboarding, which reduces training time.
User feedback highlights Zil Money’s straightforward setup and strong customer support, making it easier for your team to adopt quickly. Given the importance of minimal disruption during implementation, edge: Zil Money.
FssNet provides no documented features, leaving its capabilities entirely unclear. Its lack of features is a major disadvantage in a competitive market where hotels require comprehensive payment solutions. Zil Money offers 15 features, including Pay by Link, Recurring Payments, Contactless Payments, Payment Splitting, and support for multiple payment methods like Apple Pay, Google Pay, and PayPal.
These features cater directly to hotel needs such as guest convenience, operational flexibility, and multi-channel transactions. The absence of features in FssNet means it cannot match Zil Money’s versatility. Edge: Zil Money.
FssNet’s customer support is unreported, and with no recent reviews, it’s impossible to gauge responsiveness or quality. This lack of data signals potential risks for hoteliers relying on ongoing assistance. Zil Money has a 4.5/5 support rating, with users citing quick responses and helpful service, which is critical when resolving payment issues swiftly.
Support quality directly affects your hotel’s operational uptime and guest experience. Given the available data, edge: Zil Money.
FssNet has no verified integrations, limiting its compatibility with other hotel management systems or financial tools. Zil Money, however, offers API access and integrates with various accounting software, plus supports a range of payment methods and banks.
While specific partner counts are not provided, the ability to connect with multiple financial platforms enhances operational efficiency. The flexibility and openness of Zil Money’s integrations give it the edge. Edge: Zil Money.
With no recent reviews or ratings, FssNet cannot be reliably evaluated by hotelier sentiment. Zil Money’s 54 recent reviews and 87% recommendation rate strongly indicate high hotel satisfaction, particularly among users in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.
Property types such as boutique, branded, and extended-stay hotels favor Zil Money’s ease of use and feature set. Without current data, FssNet’s standing remains uncertain, but Zil Money’s recent positive feedback makes it the preferable choice. Edge: Zil Money.
FssNet’s pricing details are unavailable, and it appears to lack a trial or clear fee structure. Zil Money charges $400 upfront with no mention of ongoing monthly fees, and a 15-day free trial is available. This transparency helps hotels plan their budgets and evaluate ROI effectively.
Given the lack of pricing info for FssNet, Zil Money’s straightforward approach provides better clarity for hotel decision-makers.
FssNet offers a payment solution with no recent activity, reviews, or feature transparency, making it an unreliable choice for most hotels today. Its lack of recent support and features limits its appeal, especially when modern, active solutions are available.
Zil Money stands out with its 54 recent reviews, high satisfaction ratings, and comprehensive feature set. Its active support, ease of use, and international capabilities make it the more suitable choice for hotels needing reliable and flexible payment processing.
If your hotel requires a proven, fully featured platform with ongoing support, Zil Money is the clear winner. FssNet’s limited data and inactivity suggest it should be avoided unless you are committed to a riskier, untested solution.
According to HTR's product database, FssNet and Zil Money share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | FssNet |
|
|---|---|---|
| Authorization Adjustments | ||
| Gratuity Function | ||
| Multi-Currency Settlements | ||
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Recurring Payments |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tas... Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tasks. The platform’s ease of use reduces the onboarding time and enhances operational efficiency.
Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup... Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup, could make the platform even more efficient and user-friendly.
Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels... Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels' cash flow management.
Where hoteliers push back
Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations a... Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations and enhances efficiency.
Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to var... Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to varying business needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. FssNet and Zil Money share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. FssNet offers 0 verified integration partners, while Zil Money offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Zil Money leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
FssNet: No. Zil Money: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. FssNet has an HT Score of 0 and Zil Money has 63. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor