The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 323 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Gearco shines in ease of use and ROI .
RMS shines in customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Housekeeping.
Side-by-side ratings based on 323 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 1 | 322 |
After analyzing 323 verified reviews, Gearco users most value its , while RMS users highlight technical support and learning resources, scalability and feature depth, trust accounting support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Technical Support and Learning Resources
▾
|
|
|
+
Scalability and Feature Depth
▾
|
|
|
+
Trust Accounting Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Online Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine and Mobile Interface
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Writer Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
POS System Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #64 1 reviews | #7 147 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 102 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #43 1 reviews | #8 14 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #7 8 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #62 1 reviews | #11 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #13 57 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #62 1 reviews | #9 50 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #3 65 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #42 1 reviews | #11 63 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #23 20 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #12 10 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #8 7 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is vital for streamlining your hotel operations and improving guest experiences. Gearco and RMS both promise to modernize your hotel management, but they target different needs and hotel types. Your decision hinges on your property size, complexity, and operational priorities.
Gearco specializes in long-term and extended stay management, while RMS offers a broad, feature-rich platform suitable for a wide array of hotel segments. Which one aligns better with your hotel's needs?
Gearco and RMS serve different hotel segments, with RMS boasting significantly more reviews and recent feedback, making its data more reliable. RMS’s 293 reviews and 20 reviews in the last six months indicate active use and ongoing support, whereas Gearco's single review suggests limited adoption or visibility.
While Gearco offers a narrowly focused system designed for long-term stays with automation features, RMS provides a versatile platform supporting everything from boutique hotels to resorts. Do your hotel’s needs lean toward specialized long-term stay management or a comprehensive, scalable PMS?
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable property management system that handles multiple hotel types and requires extensive integrations, RMS is the clear choice. Its robust feature set (57 exclusive features) and support for complex operations suit larger, multi-property hotels or those aiming to grow fast.
Conversely, if your hotel focuses solely on long-term stays, extended stay, or budget properties, Gearco’s tailored automation, ease of use, and specific long-stay features make it the right option. For independent hotels or chains with long-term guest management, Gearco’s simplicity and targeted tools are compelling.
Gearco earns a perfect 5/5 ease-of-use score with glowing reviews about its simplicity. Users highlight its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and straightforward staff training, making it easy for your team to adopt.
RMS, with a 4.28/5 rating, is also praised for its user-friendly design but receives some feedback about the need for more digital training resources. RMS’s learning curve is manageable, especially for teams familiar with property management software.
Edge: Gearco.
RMS boasts 57 features, including guest CRM, multi-lingual/multi-currency support, booking engine, POS, and online check-in, among others. Its extensive integration options and advanced modules like guest feedback, marketing, and spa management distinguish it from Gearco.
Gearco offers a focused set of features tailored for extended stays, including automated ID retention, multi-property DNR checks, and complex rate management. Still, it lacks the breadth of RMS’s feature suite.
Edge: RMS.
Gearco’s customer support rates 4/5, with reviews mentioning solid, reliable assistance. However, its limited review count suggests less interaction or fewer users to gauge support quality.
RMS scores slightly higher at 4.48/5, with reviews praising its proactive, knowledgeable team and quick responses. RMS’s larger support team and extensive resources contribute to its higher rating.
Edge: RMS.
RMS supports 112 verified partners, far surpassing Gearco’s 5. Shared integrations like SiteMinder and Aven Hospitality benefit both, but RMS’s ecosystem includes notable vendors like Criton, Sage, and STR, offering broader connectivity.
Gearco’s limited integrations mean fewer options for connecting with your existing tools. For hotels seeking a highly connected platform, RMS is the clear leader.
Edge: RMS.
RMS’s 4.56/5 rating reflects consistent positive feedback across multiple hotel segments, especially independent and boutique properties, which rate it 4.75/5 and 5/5 respectively. Its recent reviews and high NPS score (8.51/10) reinforce its strong reputation.
Gearco, with a 0/5 rating and only one review, cannot match RMS’s credibility. The lack of recent feedback or multiple reviews diminishes confidence in Gearco’s standing.
Edge: RMS.
Gearco's pricing is not publicly disclosed, but it appears to be a subscription-based model without implementation fees or freemium options. RMS charges $800 monthly, with no free tier or trial, indicating a substantial investment.
Your budget considerations will depend on your property size and expectations. RMS’s transparent pricing makes cost planning easier but may be prohibitive for smaller hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive features spanning reservations, POS, marketing, or multi-channel management.
Not ideal if your hotel has a very narrow focus or prefers a simple, lightweight system for minimal management.
The core difference is RMS’s comprehensive feature set and wider market presence versus Gearco’s niche focus on long-term stays and simplicity. RMS is better suited for hotels seeking a scalable, all-in-one platform with extensive integrations and support.
Choose Gearco if your property exclusively handles long-term or extended stays, values automation, and wants a straightforward, easy-to-learn system. It’s ideal for independent hotels or chains with specific needs in long-stay management.
Opt for RMS if you operate a multi-property hotel or resort with complex needs, require detailed reporting, and want a platform that can grow with your business. Its broad feature set and robust support make it the stronger choice for most hotels.
In summary, RMS’s more recent reviews, higher ratings, and larger support ecosystem make it the superior, more reliable option for most hotels. Gearco remains a specialized choice for long-term stay management but lacks the breadth, integrations, and recent positive feedback that RMS offers.
According to HTR's product database, Gearco - True Extended Stay and RMS share 17 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Property Management System |
Showing top differences. 45 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
What hoteliers love
RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learnin... RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learning resources and video tutorials to aid in system navigation and maximize the utility of available features.
RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalabili... RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalability and the rich feature set, including reservation management, reporting, and housekeeping, available out of the box. Such comprehensiveness allows properties to streamline varied operations effectively.
Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates... Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates enhance its capability to manage property trust accounting efficiently, with many noting that this feature significantly reduces operational complexity, thus allowing property managers to focus on other critical tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the bookin... The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the booking process easier and potentially cost-free for returning guests, which could encourage loyalty and repeat business.
While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional... While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional columns to allow faster and more flexible report generation, aiding daily decision-making without needing to reconstruct reports from scratch.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Gearco - True Extended Stay and RMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Gearco - True Extended Stay offers 5 verified integration partners, while RMS offers 112. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Gearco - True Extended Stay leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Gearco - True Extended Stay: No. RMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Gearco has an HT Score of 0 and RMS has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor