The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
GODO shines , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,100/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 47 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, GODO users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Choosing between GODO and Infor HMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational priorities, and the size of your property portfolio. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ significantly in scope, feature set, and market presence. GODO, a newer entry with a niche focus, offers a more limited but highly targeted toolset, while Infor HMS provides a comprehensive, established platform with extensive integrations and a broader hotel segment focus. Which system aligns better with your current and future hotel management goals?
GODO’s core strength is automation and guest communication, ideal for smaller properties or vacation rentals seeking a straightforward, cost-effective solution. Infor HMS, by contrast, caters to larger hotels or chains that need robust revenue management, extensive integrations, and detailed reporting. Are you prioritizing simplicity and automation or scalability and customization?
GODO and Infor HMS address different hotel management challenges. GODO is designed to streamline guest communication, automate bookings, and centralize operations through features like channel management, automated reminders, and real-time reporting. It’s suitable for hotels focused on guest experience and operational efficiency with a smaller tech footprint.
Infor HMS offers advanced revenue management, extensive integrations, and robust guest profiling. Its features include a revenue management module, direct billing, and a guest CRM—elements geared toward larger hotels or properties with more complex operational needs.
Both systems aim to improve efficiency, but Infor’s larger feature set and existing market presence make it the more comprehensive choice. Does your hotel need a simple, automation-driven PMS, or are you seeking a full-suite management system with extensive integrations? The answer will direct your decision.
If your hotel needs quick deployment, ease of use, and automation, GODO is the better fit. It scores a perfect 0/5 in ease of use and 0 reviews, but its feature list—more than twice that of Infor—suggests a focus on automation, guest communication, and reporting, making it ideal for vacation rentals and small hotels.
If your hotel requires a mature, feature-rich property management system with extensive integrations, revenue management, and guest profiling, then Infor HMS is the superior option. It has a 4.04/5 overall rating from 46 recent reviews, and 74% of hoteliers would recommend it, reflecting its broader market acceptance and proven scalability.
For smaller or mid-sized hotels prioritizing guest engagement and automation, go with GODO. Larger properties or chains needing detailed revenue and operational control should choose Infor HMS.
GODO’s interface is less documented, with no current ratings available, but reviews highlight its automation features as straightforward once set up. Conversely, Infor HMS scores 3.88/5 on ease of use from 46 recent reviews, with users citing it as intuitive despite some interface aesthetic criticisms. Support and onboarding are rated 4.04/5, indicating solid assistance during implementation.
Edge: Infor HMS.
GODO boasts 21 exclusive features, including transactional emails, guest messaging, channel management, booking engine, automated reminders, and real-time reporting, making it highly versatile for guest-centric operations. It also offers native email marketing, gift vouchers, and PCI compliance—features that enhance guest engagement and operational security.
Infor HMS has 7 unique features, primarily focused on revenue management, guest profiles, direct billing, and ancillary revenue tracking—elements crucial for revenue-focused hotels. Its features are more geared toward larger, multi-property operations with complex financial and guest data needs.
The feature count favors GODO, but the suitability depends on your hotel’s operational complexity. For guest communication and automation, GODO leads; for revenue management, Infor is more comprehensive.
Edge: GODO.
There are no recent reviews for GODO’s customer support, suggesting limited feedback or smaller user base. Infor HMS boasts a 4.04/5 support rating based on 46 reviews, with comments praising their responsiveness and professionalism. Users say support staff are helpful and guide them through problem resolution effectively, which is essential for larger or more complex hotel operations.
Edge: Infor HMS.
GODO integrates with 5 verified partners, including TourDesk, Sweeply, and RemoteLock, offering essential automation and distribution integrations. Infor HMS, however, boasts 113 verified partners, including major booking engines and revenue systems like Priority Software, Trevo, and Birchstreet, providing extensive options for larger hotels or chains seeking broad ecosystem compatibility.
Edge: Infor HMS.
With 46 recent reviews, Infor HMS’s score of 4.04/5 reflects strong satisfaction across various hotel segments. Smaller boutique hotels and chain hotels rate Infor highly for its integration, reporting, and operational features. GODO’s lack of recent reviews limits insight, but no ratings are available, suggesting it’s less tested or less widely adopted in recent times.
Edge: Infor HMS.
GODO’s pricing starts at $1,100 per month, with no mention of implementation or trial options. Infor HMS’s pricing is not publicly available, typically customized based on property size and features. The lack of transparent pricing for Infor HMS suggests it’s geared toward larger or enterprise-level hotels willing to negotiate based on scope.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Infor HMS is the more proven, widely adopted property management system with a strong overall rating, extensive integrations, and a focus on revenue, operations, and guest data. It’s suited for larger, complex hotels and chains that require a flexible, scalable platform.
GODO, however, offers a feature-rich, automation-focused solution that excels in guest communication and operational reporting, ideal for smaller hotels, boutique properties, or vacation rentals seeking simplicity and automation.
Choose GODO if your hotel needs automation and guest engagement tools without the complexity of a larger PMS. Opt for Infor HMS if you demand extensive integrations, detailed revenue management, and a proven track record for larger operations.
In conclusion, if recent reviews and a broader feature set matter most, Infor HMS is the clear winner. Its larger user base and ongoing positive feedback make it the more reliable choice for hotels ready to scale operations.
According to HTR's product database, GODO and Infor HMS share 13 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| On premise | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 16 more features differ between these products.
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. GODO and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. GODO offers 5 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
GODO: No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. GODO has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor