Booking Engine by HotelRunner vs. STAAH Booking Engine: Which Is Right for You?

Updated May 16, 2026  ·  54 verified reviews analyzed

TLDR

We analyzed 54 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:

HotelRunner shines when it comes to customer support , with exclusive features like Referral Reporting.

STAAH shines , with exclusive features like Facebook conversion tracking.

See the full breakdown below ↓

How Does Booking Engine by HotelRunner Compare to STAAH Booking Engine?

Side-by-side ratings based on 54 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.

HTScore
74
0
Likelihood to Recommend
96%
96%
Ease of Use
4.7/5
4.7/5
Customer Support
4.8/5
4.9/5
Value for Money
4.7/5
4.7/5
Starting Price From $100/mo Contact sales
Verified Reviews 41 13

What Are the Pros and Cons of Booking Engine by HotelRunner vs STAAH Booking Engine?

After analyzing 54 verified reviews, HotelRunner users most value its customer support, ease of use, channel management, while STAAH users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.

HotelRunner HotelRunner STAAH STAAH
Pros
+ Customer Support
+ Ease of Use
+ Channel Management
+ Integration with OTAs
Cons
Booking Engine
Reporting Features

HotelRunner vs STAAH: Rankings by Hotel Segment

How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.

By Hotel Size

Segment HotelRunner HotelRunner STAAH STAAH
Small (10-24 rooms) #19 16 reviews #35 4 reviews
Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) #29 9 reviews #36 5 reviews
Large (75-199 rooms) #31 0 reviews #37 1 reviews
X-Large (200+ rooms) #25 1 reviews

By Property Type

Segment HotelRunner HotelRunner STAAH STAAH
Boutique #18 22 reviews #36 8 reviews
Luxury #28 9 reviews #33 9 reviews
Branded / Chain #31 3 reviews #34 4 reviews
Extended Stay #33 1 reviews

By Region

Segment HotelRunner HotelRunner STAAH STAAH
North America #26 1 reviews
Europe #22 12 reviews
Asia Pacific #20 3 reviews #14 11 reviews
Middle East #1 16 reviews

The Decision

Choosing the right booking engine is crucial for your hotel’s online sales, operational efficiency, and guest satisfaction. HotelRunner and STAAH both aim to streamline reservations and increase revenue, but their strengths and weaknesses differ notably. Your decision hinges on the specific needs of your property, your preferred features, and the level of support you require. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s goals?

Is HotelRunner or STAAH Better for Hotels?

HotelRunner and STAAH serve similar core functions—managing reservations, synchronizing with OTAs, and offering direct booking options. HotelRunner, founded in 2011 in the UK, has developed a robust feature set with a focus on customization and integration, but it has a smaller review base (40 reviews) with recent activity—4 reviews in the last six months—indicating current usability insights. Meanwhile, STAAH, established in 2008 in New Zealand, boasts a higher overall rating (4.81/5 vs. HotelRunner’s 4.5/5), and a significantly larger review count (13 recent reviews), making its reputation more reliably recent and validated.

HotelRunner’s platform excels in customization and marketing tools, offering unique features like social media booking integration and GDPR compliance. STAAH emphasizes ease of use, detailed analytics, and a broad network of integrations. Both address core booking needs well, but your choice depends on whether you prioritize extensive customization or straightforward analytics. Are you looking for a flexible, feature-rich platform or one with proven reliability and broad integrations?

HotelRunner vs STAAH: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs highly customizable booking options, integrated marketing tools, and advanced content management, HotelRunner is the better fit. Its features like social media integration, booking abandonment recovery, and A/B testing—absent in STAAH—support dynamic marketing strategies. On the other hand, if your priority is a highly rated, reliable platform with extensive OTA integrations and strong customer support, STAAH is preferable, especially for properties looking for straightforward operations and detailed analytics.

For boutique hotels, B&Bs, and smaller properties emphasizing marketing flexibility, HotelRunner’s more granular customization makes it a compelling choice. Larger hotels or chains that value broad OTA connectivity and proven support should lean toward STAAH. Your property profile and operational priorities will determine the best fit.

Is HotelRunner or STAAH Easier to Use?

HotelRunner scores slightly higher in ease of use (4.73/5 vs. 4.69/5) and onboarding (4.79/5 vs. 4.63/5), with reviews praising its user-friendly interface and quick setup. Users highlight that HotelRunner’s platform is intuitive for managing rates, availability, and content, with support accessible through multiple channels, including WhatsApp, for rapid assistance. Conversely, STAAH also receives high marks for usability, with a focus on simplicity and helpful customer service.

While both platforms are rated as easy to navigate, HotelRunner’s more recent positive reviews suggest it currently offers a smoother onboarding experience. Edge: HotelRunner.

Which Has Better Features: HotelRunner or STAAH?

HotelRunner offers 16 features exclusive to its platform, including social media booking, GDPR compliance, booking abandonment recovery, Google Analytics tracking, and multiple rate types like flat or floating rates. It also supports advanced promotional modules like wedding and corporate bookings, which STAAH does not provide. STAAH, however, boasts a unique feature—Facebook conversion tracking—that HotelRunner lacks.

Both platforms share 24 features, but HotelRunner’s additional customization and marketing options give it an edge. For hoteliers aiming for extensive control over guest experience and marketing, HotelRunner’s feature set is superior. Edge: HotelRunner.

Which Has Better Customer Support: HotelRunner or STAAH?

Support quality is a key factor, and recent reviews indicate that STAAH slightly outperforms HotelRunner. STAAH’s customer service is praised as “amazing,” with many reviews mentioning their team’s professionalism, quick responses, and helpful guidance. HotelRunner also receives high marks, with a 4.8/5 customer support rating, and users appreciate the support via WhatsApp and other channels.

However, given the more recent reviews for STAAH (all within the last 6 months), its support reputation appears stronger. For properties seeking responsive, dependable assistance, Edge: STAAH.

Which Has More Integrations: HotelRunner or STAAH?

STAAH significantly leads in platform integrations, with 54 verified partners compared to HotelRunner’s 17. Shared integrations include major names like Airbnb, Expedia, and Stripe. HotelRunner’s integrations focus on hotel-specific systems such as protel and Hotelogix, but STAAH’s broader network covers more OTAs, PMS, and revenue management tools, offering greater flexibility.

If your hotel depends on numerous third-party tools or plans to expand its online distribution, STAAH’s extensive integration portfolio makes it the clear choice. Edge: STAAH.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: HotelRunner or STAAH?

STAAH enjoys a higher overall rating (4.81/5 vs. HotelRunner’s 4.5/5), with recent reviews reinforcing its reputation for reliability and support. Hoteliers in boutique and resort segments particularly favor STAAH, citing its excellent support and intuitive interface. HotelRunner’s ratings are strong across the board but are based on fewer recent reviews, which slightly diminishes its current credibility.

For properties valuing recent, consistent positive feedback, STAAH is the more highly rated platform. Edge: STAAH.

How Much Do HotelRunner and STAAH Cost?

HotelRunner’s pricing starts at $100 per month, with no free trial or freemium option, positioning it as an accessible yet premium solution. STAAH’s pricing is not publicly available, indicating it may offer custom quotes or tiered packages, often typical for larger or more complex systems.

Given the transparency, HotelRunner’s cost is straightforward, but STAAH might be more flexible in pricing based on property size or needs. For budget-conscious hotels that prefer clear upfront costs, HotelRunner is preferable.

What Type of Hotel Should Use HotelRunner?

  • Hotels that need extensive customization of their booking and website experience, such as boutique hotels, B&Bs, or those with complex promotions.
  • Teams that want integrated marketing tools like social media booking and GDPR compliance.
  • Properties that value advanced reporting, A/B testing, and content control.
  • Hotels prioritizing multi-channel content distribution, including trip planning and corporate bookings.

Not ideal if your hotel:

  • Prefers a simple, plug-and-play solution without complex customization.
  • Needs broad OTA integration without demanding a high level of marketing flexibility.
  • Has limited technical support capacity and prefers a more straightforward platform.

What Type of Hotel Should Use STAAH?

  • Hotels and chains seeking a highly rated, reliable booking system with proven customer support.
  • Properties that want extensive OTA integrations, especially if they rely heavily on third-party platforms.
  • Hotels prioritizing detailed analytics, easy inventory management, and a straightforward user interface.
  • Larger hotels or chains looking for scalable solutions with broad geographic coverage.

Not ideal if your hotel:

  • Requires advanced marketing automation or custom website features.
  • Seeks a platform with extensive content customization options.
  • Prefers a system with transparent, fixed pricing from the outset.

STAAH vs HotelRunner: The Bottom Line for Hotels

HotelRunner offers a broad suite of customization and marketing features, making it suitable for boutique hotels, B&Bs, and properties that want control over their branding and guest experience. Its smaller review base and recent activity suggest it might be better suited for hotels comfortable with a platform that emphasizes flexibility over simplicity.

STAAH, however, has more recent reviews, a higher overall rating, and a larger network of integrations, making it the more dependable choice for hotels prioritizing seamless operations, extensive OTA connectivity, and strong support. Its proven track record and recent positive feedback favor larger properties or those with complex distribution needs.

If your hotel values extensive customization and marketing tools, choose HotelRunner. If reliability, broad integrations, and strong support matter most, STAAH is the better option.

How Much Do Booking Engine by HotelRunner and STAAH Booking Engine Cost?

Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.

HotelRunner HotelRunner STAAH STAAH
Starting Price From $100/mo

Which Features Does Booking Engine by HotelRunner Have That STAAH Booking Engine Doesn't (and Vice Versa)?

According to HTR's product database, Booking Engine by HotelRunner and STAAH Booking Engine share 24 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.

Feature HotelRunner HotelRunner STAAH STAAH
ADA Compliant
Alternative accommodation recommendations (when no availability)
Booking abandonment recapture
Facebook conversion tracking
Flat, floating and discounted rates
Social Media Integration/Bookings
Tariffs

Showing top differences. 5 more features differ between these products.

HotelRunner vs STAAH: The Bottom Line

HotelRunner
HotelRunner
4.8/5 from 41 reviews

What hoteliers love

Customer Support 93% positive

Customer support receives accolades for being responsive and efficient. Users appreciate the prompt assistance via various communication channels, inc... Customer support receives accolades for being responsive and efficient. Users appreciate the prompt assistance via various communication channels, including WhatsApp.

Ease of Use 95% positive

The platform is noted for its user-friendly interface and ease of navigation, making set-up and management straightforward for hoteliers of varied tec... The platform is noted for its user-friendly interface and ease of navigation, making set-up and management straightforward for hoteliers of varied technical expertise.

Channel Management 79% positive

Users praise Hotelrunner for its strong channel management capabilities, allowing seamless synchronization with numerous OTAs. This eliminates double... Users praise Hotelrunner for its strong channel management capabilities, allowing seamless synchronization with numerous OTAs. This eliminates double bookings and simplifies inventory management.

Where hoteliers push back

Booking Engine 43% negative

The integrated booking engine is highly regarded for driving direct bookings and allowing customization of packages. Many users appreciate the ease of... The integrated booking engine is highly regarded for driving direct bookings and allowing customization of packages. Many users appreciate the ease of creating OTAs listings, contributing to increased occupancy and revenues.

Reporting Features 80% negative

Users highlight the need for more robust and customizable reporting tools to aid in rate strategy decisions, reflecting a critical area for future imp... Users highlight the need for more robust and customizable reporting tools to aid in rate strategy decisions, reflecting a critical area for future improvement.

Ranks higher for

Large (75-199 rooms) #31 vs #37
Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) #29 vs #36
Small (10-24 rooms) #19 vs #35
X-Small (< 10 rooms) #5 vs #30

Unique capabilities

Tariffs Flat, floating and discounted rates ADA Compliant Social Media Integration/Bookings Alternative accommodation recommendations (when no availability)
4.7/5 ease of use 4.8/5 support 17 integrations
Visit Profile
STAAH
STAAH
4.8/5 from 13 reviews

Ranks higher for

IN #7 vs #21
NZ #3 vs #7
Asia Pacific #14 vs #20

Unique capabilities

Facebook conversion tracking
4.7/5 ease of use 4.9/5 support 54 integrations
Visit Profile

Where the ratings diverge most

Overall Rating STAAH 4.8 vs 4.5 (+0.3)

Frequently Asked Questions About Booking Engine by HotelRunner vs STAAH Booking Engine

Can Booking Engine by HotelRunner replace STAAH Booking Engine?

It depends on your requirements. Booking Engine by HotelRunner and STAAH Booking Engine share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Booking Engine by HotelRunner offers 17 verified integration partners, while STAAH Booking Engine offers 54. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.

Which is better for small or independent hotels?

Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Booking Engine by HotelRunner leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.

Do Booking Engine by HotelRunner or STAAH Booking Engine offer a free plan?

Booking Engine by HotelRunner: No. STAAH Booking Engine: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.

How Does HTR Evaluate and Rank Booking Engine by HotelRunner and STAAH Booking Engine?

The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. HotelRunner has an HT Score of 74 and STAAH has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.

Criteria Group Weight What It Measures
Customer Ratings & Reviews

How highly do users recommend this product?

Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories

The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias.

Partner Ecosystem

How highly do tech partners recommend this company?

Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality

Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack.

Customer Centricity

How customer-centric is this organization?

Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness

Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features.

Reach, Staying Power & Resources

How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing?

Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score

Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity.

Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →

Get personalized product recommendations

Product recommendations advisor

Ghostel icon

Let´s lookup your hotel information