The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 41 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
HotelRunner shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Automated reporting.
Topaz Services shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 41 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 41 | 0 |
After analyzing 41 verified reviews, HotelRunner users most value its customer support, ease of use, channel management, while Topaz Services users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Topaz Services |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with OTAs
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting Features
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Topaz Services |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #19 16 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #29 9 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #31 0 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #25 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Topaz Services |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #18 22 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #28 9 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #31 3 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #33 1 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Topaz Services |
|---|---|---|
| North America | #26 1 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #22 12 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #20 3 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #1 16 reviews | — |
Choosing the right booking engine is crucial for your hotel’s revenue and guest experience. HotelRunner’s Booking Engine and Topaz C5 serve different roles; the former is a comprehensive platform with robust features, while the latter emphasizes customer feedback analysis. Both aim to improve reservations, but their approaches are distinct. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
HotelRunner provides a complete booking engine integrated with channel management, marketing, and website tools. It boasts a 4.5-star rating based on 40 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its ease of use, extensive features, and high customer support scores, like a 4.8/5.
Topaz C5, on the other hand, does not have ratings or reviews available, making its data less current and less reliable for decision-makers. Its core strength lies in review analysis, not booking management. Are you seeking a full booking solution or a tool to analyze customer sentiment?
If your hotel needs a versatile booking engine with multi-channel connectivity, customizable rates, and integrated marketing tools, go with HotelRunner. Its 40 features including website integration, pre/post-stay emails, and multi-currency support make it suitable for a wide range of property types, especially boutique and city center hotels.
If your hotel’s priority is understanding customer feedback and sentiment, Topaz C5 is the better fit. Its review analysis capabilities can guide service improvements but do not replace core booking functions. For hotels seeking operational control over reservations, HotelRunner is the clear choice.
HotelRunner scores a 4.73/5 for ease of use, with a user-friendly interface praised in recent reviews. Hoteliers find onboarding smooth, supported by a 4.79/5 onboarding rating, and support is highly rated at 4.8/5, often praised for quick responses via WhatsApp.
Topaz C5 lacks publicly available user experience data, making it impossible to gauge its ease of use reliably. Its focus on review analytics suggests a backend interface that may not be as intuitive for everyday booking operations.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner offers 40 features tailored specifically to booking management and hotel operations, including website tools, multi-lingual support, integration with social media, rate variations, and automated reporting. Notably, features like booking abandonment recapture, conversion rate reports, and flexible rate plans are unique.
Topaz C5 does not list any features but specializes in review analysis, sentiment summaries, and actionable insights from customer feedback. Its core strength is data-driven feedback rather than booking functions.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner’s customer support is highly rated at 4.8/5, with recent reviews emphasizing prompt, helpful assistance that often responds via WhatsApp, making onboarding and troubleshooting easier. Users describe their support experience as “responsive and efficient.”
Topaz C5 offers no publicly available customer support ratings or reviews, so its support quality cannot be reliably assessed. Its focus appears to be more on review analysis rather than direct customer service for booking management.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner integrates with 17 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Airbnb, Agoda, and channel management tools like Hotelogix and protel. Its extensive integrations simplify multi-channel distribution and rate management.
Topaz C5 has only 2 verified integrations, including Yanolja Cloud Solution and one more, limiting its connectivity options. It does not appear to focus on integrations but rather on data analysis post-customer interaction.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with a 4.5/5 overall rating from 40 reviews and a 96% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across segments, especially boutique and city hotels, praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Topaz C5 has no available recent reviews or ratings, so no clear property-level feedback exists. Its utility is primarily in review analysis, not hotel operations.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner charges a base price of $100 per month with no freemium or trial options listed publicly. Its transparent pricing model makes budgeting straightforward.
Topaz C5’s pricing information is not publicly available, indicating it likely offers customized or enterprise pricing. The lack of clear pricing makes direct comparison difficult.
Not ideal if your hotel solely needs customer review analysis without a booking engine. Smaller properties with minimal online distribution may find more features than they need.
Not ideal if your primary need is managing reservations, channel distribution, or website bookings. Hotels seeking an integrated, full-service booking engine should look elsewhere.
HotelRunner is a comprehensive booking platform with extensive features, broad integrations, and high user ratings. It’s best suited for properties that want operational control, multi-channel management, and direct booking capabilities.
Topaz C5 excels as a review analytics tool, helping hotels interpret customer feedback effectively. However, it does not offer core booking features and lacks recent user reviews or clear pricing.
If your hotel needs a full booking engine with proven support and recent reviews, HotelRunner is the stronger choice. If your focus is on customer sentiment analysis, consider Topaz C5, but note its limitations in booking management.
In conclusion, for most hotels aiming to boost reservations and streamline operations, HotelRunner’s recent review-backed performance makes it the preferable solution today.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Topaz Services | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Booking Engine by HotelRunner and Topaz C5 share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Topaz Services |
|---|---|---|
| Automated reporting | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Pooled inventory | ||
| Post-stay emails | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Tariffs |
Showing top differences. 28 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Customer support receives accolades for being responsive and efficient. Users appreciate the prompt assistance via various communication channels, inc... Customer support receives accolades for being responsive and efficient. Users appreciate the prompt assistance via various communication channels, including WhatsApp.
The platform is noted for its user-friendly interface and ease of navigation, making set-up and management straightforward for hoteliers of varied tec... The platform is noted for its user-friendly interface and ease of navigation, making set-up and management straightforward for hoteliers of varied technical expertise.
Users praise Hotelrunner for its strong channel management capabilities, allowing seamless synchronization with numerous OTAs. This eliminates double... Users praise Hotelrunner for its strong channel management capabilities, allowing seamless synchronization with numerous OTAs. This eliminates double bookings and simplifies inventory management.
Where hoteliers push back
The integrated booking engine is highly regarded for driving direct bookings and allowing customization of packages. Many users appreciate the ease of... The integrated booking engine is highly regarded for driving direct bookings and allowing customization of packages. Many users appreciate the ease of creating OTAs listings, contributing to increased occupancy and revenues.
Users highlight the need for more robust and customizable reporting tools to aid in rate strategy decisions, reflecting a critical area for future imp... Users highlight the need for more robust and customizable reporting tools to aid in rate strategy decisions, reflecting a critical area for future improvement.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Booking Engine by HotelRunner and Topaz C5 share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Booking Engine by HotelRunner offers 17 verified integration partners, while Topaz C5 offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Booking Engine by HotelRunner leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Booking Engine by HotelRunner: No. Topaz C5: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. HotelRunner has an HT Score of 74 and Topaz Services has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor