The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 115 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
HotelRunner shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Email Marketing and Data Analysis & Reporting.
TripJack shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 115 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 115 | 0 |
After analyzing 115 verified reviews, HotelRunner users most value its multi-channel management, support and reliability, ease of use, while TripJack users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
TripJack |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Multi-channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Reliability
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time Updates
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Interface Improvements
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
TripJack |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #12 40 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #13 22 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #10 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #15 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
TripJack |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #7 51 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #10 31 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #14 17 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #12 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
TripJack |
|---|---|---|
| North America | #19 1 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #14 16 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #13 8 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 63 reviews | — |
Choosing the right channel management software is critical for your hotel's revenue and operational efficiency. HotelRunner’s Channel Manager offers a proven, highly-rated solution with extensive reviews, while TripJack provides a less documented alternative that currently lacks user feedback to support its capabilities. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize proven reliability and features or are considering a lesser-known option with no recent reviews.
HotelRunner’s product is well-established, with a robust customer base and recent reviews, making it the safer choice. TripJack’s limited information and absence of recent user feedback make it difficult to evaluate confidently. So, which tool better suits your needs?
HotelRunner is designed to streamline multi-channel reservations, reduce overbookings, and automate rate updates, addressing core hotel operational challenges. TripJack claims to serve as a channel manager but provides no recent reviews or feature data, leaving its effectiveness unclear.
HotelRunner’s recent reviews consistently praise its ease of use, real-time sync, and customer support, making it a trusted choice for hotels that need reliable multi-channel management. Conversely, TripJack’s lack of recent reviews and transparency on features mean you cannot confidently assess its ability to meet your hotel’s needs. Do you want a proven, customer-vetted solution, or are you willing to take a risk on an untested platform?
If your hotel requires a channel manager with a large feature set, proven performance, and recent user feedback, go with HotelRunner. It’s suitable for independent hotels, boutique properties, and larger hotels seeking reliable multi-channel control, especially given its 109 reviews and 4.78/5 overall rating.
If your hotel is small or experimenting with channel management and has no immediate need for extensive features, TripJack might seem appealing, but its lack of recent reviews makes it a risky choice. For now, HotelRunner’s extensive experience and positive feedback make it the more dependable option for your team.
HotelRunner scores 4.7/5 for ease of use, with many users highlighting its straightforward interface and helpful onboarding support. Customers particularly mention how quick and simple it is to connect and synchronize channels, with live support to assist during setup.
TripJack offers no recent user reviews or ratings, so it’s impossible to assess its UI or onboarding experience. Without verifiable feedback, confidence in its ease of use is lacking. Based on available data, Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner boasts 24 unique features, including email marketing, web design, data analysis, meta search marketing, and PMS connectivity—features that TripJack provides none of. Its tools support inventory management, multi-lingual operations, real-time 2-way integrations, and detailed analytics, giving your team extensive control and insight.
TripJack’s feature set remains undocumented and appears very limited or unspecified. Without concrete feature advantages, HotelRunner’s extensive capabilities clearly set it apart. Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner’s customer support scores an impressive 4.7/5, with reviews praising quick responses, personalized assistance, and effective problem-solving. Many users mention how support staff like Patricia helped them navigate setup and ongoing operations smoothly.
TripJack provides no recent reviews or support ratings, leaving its customer service quality unknown. In B2B software, support quality is crucial, and HotelRunner’s proven track record favors it heavily. Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner offers 17 verified integrations with partners like Oracle Hospitality, Airbnb, Expedia, and more, providing broad connectivity essential for hotel operations. TripJack has zero verified integrations, limiting its practical usability in a multi-channel environment.
Without integrations, TripJack’s potential is severely hampered, making HotelRunner the clear leader here. Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner’s extensive reviews, including recent ones, show an average rating of 4.78/5, with 96% of users willing to recommend it. Hotels of various segments, especially independent and boutique hotels, consistently praise its reliability and support.
TripJack has no recent reviews, so it cannot be rated based on user satisfaction. For confidence and proven success, HotelRunner remains the preferred choice. Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner charges a straightforward $100 monthly fee with no implementation costs or freemium options. Pricing details for TripJack are unavailable, making it difficult to compare value or determine affordability.
Given HotelRunner’s transparent pricing and positive ROI ratings, it likely offers better value over time. TripJack’s unclear costs add risk; therefore, HotelRunner is the more predictable investment.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in proven performance and feature depth. HotelRunner is a comprehensive, well-reviewed platform trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide, with recent positive feedback and extensive integrations.
Choose HotelRunner if you want a dependable, feature-rich channel manager supported by a large user base and recent reviews. It’s ideal for hotels seeking consistent, efficient multi-channel management with high support standards.
TripJack, lacking recent validation and detailed feature data, appears unsuitable for hotels prioritizing reliability and proven results. If you’re considering a risk-free, thoroughly tested solution, HotelRunner is the clear choice.
In conclusion, unless your hotel has minimal distribution needs and can tolerate uncertainty, HotelRunner provides a safer, more effective solution backed by current user feedback.
Channel Managers pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
TripJack | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, HotelRunner Channel Manager and TripJack share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
TripJack |
|---|---|---|
| Conversion Rate Optimization | ||
| Data Analysis & Reporting | ||
| Email Marketing | ||
| Meta search marketing | ||
| Web Design | ||
| Web Development |
Showing top differences. 12 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users praise HotelRunner for its ability to manage multiple booking channels seamlessly from a single platform. This feature is specifically highlight... Users praise HotelRunner for its ability to manage multiple booking channels seamlessly from a single platform. This feature is specifically highlighted as beneficial during peak seasons, reducing workload and human error while ensuring all channels are up-to-date.
Quick access to support and reliable operation are often underlined in reviews. Users experience prompt responses when assistance is needed, ensuring... Quick access to support and reliable operation are often underlined in reviews. Users experience prompt responses when assistance is needed, ensuring smooth operations without major disruptions.
Customers frequently mention the user-friendly nature of the system, particularly noting the convenience of controlling and sending prices across mult... Customers frequently mention the user-friendly nature of the system, particularly noting the convenience of controlling and sending prices across multiple channels. This ease of use is a significant advantage for hotel staff dealing with daily operations.
Where hoteliers push back
Some reviews suggest minor improvements to the interface could be beneficial. While the system generally meets expectations, enhancing the interface c... Some reviews suggest minor improvements to the interface could be beneficial. While the system generally meets expectations, enhancing the interface could further streamline operations.
A common point of criticism is the speed of the updating process. Even though it is working smoothly, some users feel it could be faster to enhance ef... A common point of criticism is the speed of the updating process. Even though it is working smoothly, some users feel it could be faster to enhance efficiency during operations.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. HotelRunner Channel Manager and TripJack share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. HotelRunner Channel Manager offers 17 verified integration partners, while TripJack offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. HotelRunner Channel Manager leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
HotelRunner Channel Manager: No. TripJack: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. HotelRunner has an HT Score of 76 and TripJack has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor