The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 887 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
planet / Hoist shines .
Mews shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 887 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 887 |
After analyzing 887 verified reviews, planet / Hoist users most value its , while Mews users highlight ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 329 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 397 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 45 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #3 49 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #5 220 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 170 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 130 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #8 106 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #28 8 reviews |
Choosing between Hoist and Mews PMS comes down to your hotel’s specific needs and your operational priorities. Both aim to streamline property management, but their approaches and capabilities differ significantly. Hoist, with virtually no recent reviews and an overall rating of 0/5, offers little evidence of current usability or support. Mews, by contrast, boasts over 750 reviews in the last six months and a 4.62/5 rating, demonstrating strong recent performance. Are you willing to trust a platform with no recent customer feedback, or do you prefer a solution with proven satisfaction?
Hoist’s low ratings and zero review count suggest it’s largely inactive or ineffective today, leaving your team to question its reliability. Meanwhile, Mews’s extensive recent feedback emphasizes its reliability, ongoing innovation, and widespread adoption. Hoteliers report that Mews saves time, improves guest experiences, and streamlines operations, whereas Hoist has no recent positive signals. Do you want your property management system to be a proven asset or an untested risk?
If your hotel needs a dependable, modern PMS with extensive integrations, automation, and a large support ecosystem, go with Mews. For boutique hotels, chains, or properties seeking scalable solutions with advanced features, Mews’s 59 unique capabilities—like revenue management, online check-in, and guest CRM—make it the clear choice. Conversely, Hoist’s lack of recent reviews and features disqualifies it from serious consideration for contemporary hospitality operations.
Mews’s 4.7/5 ease of use rating, backed by recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding, makes it highly adoptable. Customers highlight its modern design and straightforward workflows, with some noting that training is minimal and staff can work remotely. Hoist, with a 0/5 usability rating and no recent feedback, offers no clear evidence of user-friendliness. Edge: Mews.
Mews features 59 capabilities, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, online booking, guest CRM, automated night audits, and a mobile app—all tailored for different hotel types. Hoist provides no recent features or updates, rendering it irrelevant against Mews’s robust, regularly updated feature set. If features matter, Mews’s comprehensive toolkit wins easily. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings (4.27/5) and recent reviews show a responsive team that resolves issues swiftly, with hotelers praising their onboarding and ongoing assistance. Hoist’s zero reviews and poor support reputation mean your team could face delays or unresolved questions. For reliable support, Mews is the clear leader. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 partners, including essential tools like channel managers, revenue systems, and payment providers, offering end-to-end connectivity. Hoist, with just 2 verified partners, provides minimal integration options, limiting flexibility. For a connected tech ecosystem, Mews’s vast marketplace dominates. Edge: Mews.
Mews receives a 4.64/5 rating from 679 reviews, with independent hotels, boutique properties, and chains appreciating its usability, reliability, and support. Hoist’s ratings are nonexistent or unreported, indicating no recent customer validation. For confidence in customer satisfaction, Mews is the preferred choice. Edge: Mews.
Hoist’s pricing details are unavailable, which can be a red flag for transparency. Mews charges a $900 monthly fee, with no mention of implementation or setup costs, providing clarity for budgeting. The absence of transparent pricing from Hoist further favors Mews’s predictable model. Edge: Mews.
Mews is a proven, feature-rich PMS preferred by modern hoteliers. It’s ideal for properties that prioritize operational efficiency, guest experience, and connectivity, especially given its recent reviews and extensive ecosystem. Hoist, lacking recent validation and features, is not suitable for hotels aiming to compete effectively today.
If your hotel needs a dependable platform with ongoing support and innovation, go with Mews. It’s the choice of the majority of hotels seeking growth, efficiency, and guest satisfaction. Hoist’s limited and outdated profile makes it a risky, outdated option not worth your investment today.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
According to HTR's product database, hotsoft by planet and Mews PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 47 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Where hoteliers push back
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting featu... While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting features. Users express the desire for more granular data insights, particularly in reservations and revenue analysis.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. hotsoft by planet and Mews PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. hotsoft by planet offers 2 verified integration partners, while Mews PMS offers 336. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Mews PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
hotsoft by planet: No. Mews PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. planet / Hoist has an HT Score of 0 and Mews has 99. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor