The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 108 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
HS/3 shines .
Planet shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like On premise and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 108 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 108 |
After analyzing 108 verified reviews, HS/3 users most value its , while Planet users highlight functionality and features, ease of use, multi-property management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Functionality and Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Multi-property Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #27 32 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 50 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 10 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #17 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #21 42 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #21 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #17 33 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #20 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #29 6 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #10 79 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #15 2 reviews |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest experience. HS/3 (acq Mews) and protel PMS by Planet are two prominent contenders, yet they target different hotel types and feature sets. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and future growth plans.
HS/3 offers a minimal presence in the market with no recent reviews, while Planet boasts over 105 reviews, with the most recent in the last six months, making it the more proven solution. How do these products compare on core aspects like usability, features, support, and cost?
HS/3 (acq Mews) positions itself as a simple, streamlined PMS designed primarily for hotels seeking basic operation management. Its lack of recent reviews and zero ratings suggest limited current adoption or market presence, which raises questions about its ongoing support and feature development.
Conversely, protel PMS by Planet has a well-established reputation, with 105 reviews and recent feedback from hoteliers. These reviews highlight its broad feature set, deep integration ecosystem, and positive user experiences, especially among independent and boutique properties.
Both systems aim to manage reservations, check-ins, and payments but diverge significantly in their maturity, support, and scalability. Are you prioritizing a proven, high-rated platform or a less documented, potentially niche solution?
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable PMS with extensive integrations and a proven track record, go with protel PMS. It’s suitable for a wide range of property types, from boutique hotels to resorts, especially if multi-property management is on your agenda.
If your hotel operates on a very limited scale and requires only basic functionalities without advanced integrations, HS/3 might seem appealing, but the lack of recent reviews and market data makes it risky. For most hotels, protel’s proven performance and feature depth make it the safer, smarter choice.
HS/3’s user interface and usability are undocumented, with no recent ratings or reviews to gauge ease of use. Its absence from recent feedback suggests it may lack modern design standards or active support channels, which could hinder staff adoption.
By contrast, protel PMS scores over 4.1/5 for ease of use based on 105 reviews. Hoteliers praise its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and quick staff adaptation, with comments like “the system is well-arranged and easy to navigate.” Edge: protel PMS.
HS/3 offers no documented features or unique functionalities, suggesting a limited or outdated feature set. It might cover essential PMS basics but lacks the advanced tools many hotels now expect, such as integrated revenue management, online booking, or multi-currency support.
Protel PMS includes 46 features, such as revenue management, multi-lingual interfaces, online booking engines, integrated payments, guest CRM, and real-time reporting. Its ability to connect with over 1,200 hospitality systems offers a clear advantage. Edge: protel PMS.
HS/3 has no recent reviews or ratings related to customer support, leaving uncertainty about its responsiveness or service quality.
Protel PMS is supported by 105 reviews, with a 3.95/5 customer support rating. Users commend its 24/7 support, multilingual assistance, and consistent high marks for responsiveness, especially post-implementation. Hoteliers describe their support as reliable, though some mention occasional delays. Edge: protel PMS.
HS/3 offers no verified integrations, indicating limited connectivity to other systems or reliance on basic standalone functionality.
In contrast, protel PMS boasts 195 verified integrations, including popular channel managers, revenue tools, and other third-party systems. Its extensive ecosystem allows hotels to customize workflows and scale operationally. Edge: protel PMS.
With zero reviews and ratings, HS/3’s reputation cannot be assessed through user feedback. Its market presence appears minimal or inactive.
Protel PMS, however, has a high rating of 4.11/5 based on 105 reviews, predominantly from independent and boutique hotels. Recent feedback reflects satisfaction with its flexibility, integration, and support, with some noting it’s “their solid foundation for growth.” Edge: protel PMS.
HS/3 does not disclose any pricing information, suggesting it may be a custom or legacy solution with unknown costs.
Protel PMS is priced at $500/month, with no free tier or trial. This straightforward, predictable pricing makes budgeting easier, especially given its extensive feature set and support. The investment aligns with its market reputation and comprehensive capabilities.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in market presence, feature depth, and user feedback. protel PMS is a well-established, feature-rich platform trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide, with recent reviews confirming its usability and support.
For hotels that need a versatile, scalable PMS with extensive integrations and proven reliability, protel PMS is the clear winner. Its high customer satisfaction, broad ecosystem, and active user community make it the safer, more future-proof choice.
HS/3, on the other hand, appears suitable only for very small properties or niche markets where basic management suffices, but its lack of recent reviews and features makes it a higher-risk option. Unless your hotel’s needs are minimal and local support is critical, protel PMS is the recommended solution.
In summary, if your hotel values proven performance, extensive features, and trusted support, go with protel PMS. It has the market presence, recent positive reviews, and ecosystem to support your hotel’s growth and guest experience. HS/3’s limited data and absence of recent reviews suggest it’s not the best choice for most hotels aiming for operational excellence today.
According to HTR's product database, HS/3 (acq Mews) and protel PMS (by Planet) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
What hoteliers love
Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management.... Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management. However, many reviews expressed disappointment that a lot of these functionalities are incomplete, buggy, or missing entirely when dealing with more complex setups or multi-property environments. Custom reports and seamless integration with other tools are also highlighted as beneficial.
The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the... The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the efficiency in managing daily operations. However, certain updates have made certain functions more complex and less intuitive than before.
Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfa... Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfaces, many found the system frustratingly limited for multi-location setups, highlighting significant bugs and reduced functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor resp... Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor response times after the acquisition by Planet. Users recommend improving the speed and reliability of customer service.
Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. H... Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. However, this flexibility often comes at a high cost, and some required features are only available through paid custom development.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. HS/3 (acq Mews) and protel PMS (by Planet) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. HS/3 (acq Mews) offers 0 verified integration partners, while protel PMS (by Planet) offers 194. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. protel PMS (by Planet) leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
HS/3 (acq Mews): No. protel PMS (by Planet): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. HS/3 has an HT Score of 0 and Planet has 33. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor