The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 48 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
HUGO Hotelsoftware GmbH shines .
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 48 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 1 | 47 |
After analyzing 48 verified reviews, HUGO Hotelsoftware GmbH users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #57 1 reviews | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #69 0 reviews | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #55 0 reviews | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #44 1 reviews | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) depends on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. HUGO by HUGO Hotelsoftware GmbH aims to simplify hotel management through its minimalistic approach, but it offers very limited features and has no recent reviews, making it difficult to assess its current suitability. In contrast, Infor HMS provides a broad array of features and recent, detailed feedback, positioning it as a more reliable choice for most hotels.
Both products address core hotel management functions, but they diverge sharply in development maturity, feature set, and user feedback. Are you seeking a straightforward, lightweight PMS or a comprehensive, feature-rich platform? The answer will influence which solution better serves your team.
HUGO is a very new system founded in 2020 with no reviews in the past six months, and its overall rating is 0/5. Its limited feature count and lack of recent user feedback make it hard to evaluate, especially for hotels that rely on proven, supported software. Conversely, Infor boasts 46 reviews, a strong 4.04/5 overall rating, and a recent NPS score of 7.15/5, demonstrating active usage and ongoing customer engagement.
Infor’s extensive feature set—spanning housekeeping, guest profiles, revenue management, and automation—appears well-suited for hotels seeking deep operational integration. HUGO, with essentially no features or reviews, seems more like a prototype or niche tool rather than a mature PMS. Is your hotel prepared to adopt an untested platform, or do you prefer a system with proven stability and support?
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-packed PMS capable of handling complex operations and integrations, Infor is the clear choice. Its 20 unique features—including online support, guest CRM, automated night audits, and revenue tracking—are unmatched by HUGO’s minimal offering. For hotels that prioritize operational flexibility and scalability, Infor’s extensive capabilities are essential.
Should your hotel be a smaller operation or testing new software without critical operational needs, HUGO might seem appealing due to its simplicity. However, given its lack of recent reviews and features, it’s unlikely to meet the demands of a busy or growing property. Therefore, for most hotels, Infor’s mature platform provides peace of mind and comprehensive support—making it the more pragmatic option.
HUGO’s user experience cannot be assessed due to the absence of reviews or ratings. Its interface, onboarding, and staff adoption are entirely unknown, suggesting a high risk of usability issues or steep learning curves. Infor, meanwhile, scores 3.88/5 in ease of use, with many users describing it as accessible and straightforward once familiarized.
Reviews praise Infor’s short onboarding times and intuitive navigation, supported by a 4.04/5 customer support rating. Support responsiveness and helpful training make it easier for your team to adopt the system with minimal disruption. Edge: Infor.
Infor offers 20 distinct features, including housekeping modules, guest profiles, cloud deployment, multi-lingual support, and automation tools like night audits and revenue reports. These features cover nearly every core operational need for mid-to-large hotels, especially those requiring customization and deep integration.
HUGO, with zero listed features and no recent updates or reviews, lacks any comparable functionality. Its minimalistic approach might suit very small or niche properties, but it doesn’t provide the advanced features necessary for modern, competitive hotels. Edge: Infor.
HUGO’s support ratings are unavailable, and with no recent reviews, assessing support quality is impossible. This lack of data introduces risk, especially if technical issues arise. Infor’s support scores over 4/5, with reviews highlighting promptness, professionalism, and helpful guidance during onboarding and troubleshooting.
Users note that Infor’s support team guides them through issues efficiently, which is critical for minimizing downtime. If reliable support is essential for your property’s operations, Infor clearly leads here. Edge: Infor.
Infor integrates with over 113 partners, including major booking channels, revenue management, and payment providers, covering a broad ecosystem. HUGO’s integration count is just 7, sharing only one partner with Infor, which suggests a much more limited ability to connect with other systems.
For hotels that rely on multiple third-party solutions, Infor’s extensive partner network ensures smoother workflows and less manual work. If integrations are a priority, Infor is the obvious choice. Edge: Infor.
With 46 recent reviews, Infor’s average rating is 4.04/5, and it is favored across multiple hotel segments, including boutique, city center, and resort hotels. Many reviews highlight its feature richness, flexibility, and support, especially for hotels seeking automation and operational insights.
HUGO’s rating is 0/5 with no reviews in the last six months, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or performance. Given the active user feedback and higher ratings, Infor clearly resonates more positively with hoteliers. Edge: Infor.
Pricing details for both systems are not publicly available. Typically, both products are offered as custom quotes based on property size, features, and implementation complexity. Expect Infor to be priced higher due to its extensive feature set and enterprise focus, while HUGO’s minimal offering suggests a lower or more basic pricing model—if any.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
At its core, Infor offers a full-featured, well-supported PMS designed for hotels that want operational efficiency and growth potential. Its extensive feature suite and active user community make it suitable for properties that need more than basic management.
HUGO, with no recent data or features, appears more like an embryonic product unlikely to meet the demands of most hotels today. If your hotel requires proven stability, integrations, and support, Infor remains the strong choice.
Choose Infor if you want a reliable, scalable, and feature-rich PMS with proven customer satisfaction. Opt for HUGO only if your hotel operates on a very small scale or as a test project—and even then, proceed cautiously.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, HUGO and Infor HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. HUGO and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. HUGO offers 7 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 3.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
HUGO: No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. HUGO Hotelsoftware GmbH has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor