The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
HyperPAy shines .
Zil Money shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 58 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, HyperPAy users most value its , while Zil Money users highlight user-friendly interface, customer experience enhancements, payment processing speed. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| HyperPAy |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Experience Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
+
Payment Processing Speed
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
|
|
−
Approval Process
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | HyperPAy |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 12 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | HyperPAy |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #3 15 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 25 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | HyperPAy |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #3 51 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #3 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #2 1 reviews |
Choosing between HyperPay by HyperPAy and Zil Money requires understanding how each product addresses your hotel’s payment processing needs. HyperPay appears to have minimal recent reviews and a very low overall score, indicating limited current support or satisfaction. Meanwhile, Zil Money boasts a higher review count (54 reviews) with all recent feedback, giving it a stronger foundation of user experience. Both aim to facilitate payments, but their scope and stability differ markedly.
Your decision depends on your hotel’s priorities: do you need a simple, reliable platform with proven support, or are you seeking a broader suite of features and integrations? Which product aligns better with your hotel’s operational complexity?
HyperPay, with a 0/5 overall rating and no recent reviews, likely offers limited functionality and support—if it’s even actively maintained. Zil Money, in contrast, has a 62.92/100 score based on 54 reviews, all within the past six months, indicating ongoing user feedback and product updates. HyperPay’s minimal data suggests it may not be a viable option for your hotel’s payment needs. Does your hotel want a platform with current user validation?
HyperPay’s lack of recent reviews means it’s probably not actively supported or trusted by hotels today. Zil Money’s higher score and recent feedback confirm it’s a more reliable choice for processing payments, especially across diverse regions and currencies. Which product’s stability and support are more critical for your operation?
If your hotel prioritizes straightforward, easy-to-implement solutions with a focus on core payment processing, HyperPay’s near-zero reviews and absence of features suggest it’s not suitable. However, if you need a platform with extensive features like multi-currency settlements, contactless payments, and payment splitting, Zil Money’s 15 unique features make it a clear choice.
For hotels that value a proven, well-rated system with recent customer feedback, Zil Money’s 54 reviews and 87% likelihood to recommend demonstrate its reliability. If your hotel needs a flexible, fully-featured payment platform, go with Zil Money. For a minimal or experimental approach, HyperPay may suffice, but that’s unlikely given the current data.
HyperPay’s ratings are nonexistent, with zero reviews or scores to evaluate, which suggests no publicly available user feedback on usability. Conversely, Zil Money has a high Ease of Use score of 4.5/5, with multiple reviewers praising its intuitive, straightforward interface that simplifies complex financial tasks.
Hotels that need a platform their staff can adopt quickly will find Zil Money’s user-friendly design a significant advantage. Given the absence of data on HyperPay’s usability, edge: Zil Money.
HyperPay offers no features or integrations, while Zil Money provides 15 distinct functionalities, including Pay by Link, Recurring Payments, Multi-Currency Settlements, Contactless Payments, and Payment Splitting. These features address a broad spectrum of hotel payment needs and are well-supported, according to recent reviews.
If your hotel requires advanced payment features and multi-channel payment options, Zil Money’s comprehensive suite clearly surpasses HyperPay. Edge: Zil Money.
HyperPay’s support ratings are unavailable, and with no recent reviews, it’s difficult to assess its customer service quality. Zil Money, with a 4.5/5 customer support rating from 54 reviews, is praised for its responsiveness and reliable assistance, though some users suggest faster service could improve.
For your hotel, quick and effective support is crucial, especially when processing payments across regions. Based on current data, edge: Zil Money.
HyperPay has only 1 verified partner, Yanolja Cloud Solution, limiting its integration options. Zil Money offers no verified third-party partners but supports API integration, making it more flexible for hotels with existing systems.
If seamless integration with other hotel management tools is essential, Zil Money’s API and potential for custom connections make it more adaptable. Edge: Zil Money.
HyperPay’s review data is non-existent, suggesting no recent hotel feedback or ratings. Zil Money, on the other hand, has a 87% likelihood of recommendation based on 54 reviews, with hotels across various segments like luxury, budget, and boutique hotels expressing satisfaction.
Hotels seeking a trusted, highly-rated payment platform should favor Zil Money, especially given its recent positive feedback. Edge: Zil Money.
HyperPay’s pricing details are unavailable, which raises questions about transparency and suitability for your budget. Zil Money charges a $400 base price with no ongoing monthly or implementation fees, but pricing specifics are available on their site.
If predictable costs are a priority, Zil Money’s straightforward fee structure offers clarity. HyperPay’s lack of pricing information makes it a less transparent choice.
Given HyperPay’s limited data, it’s best suited for hotels with simple payment workflows and low complexity.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a free, minimal setup or has limited regional presence.
The core difference lies in support, features, and current user validation. HyperPay offers no recent feedback, no features, and minimal support, making it an unlikely choice for hotels today. Zil Money, with a high review count, clear feature set, and strong recent ratings, stands out as the more reliable, scalable solution.
If your hotel needs a dependable payment processing platform with multiple functionalities and ongoing support, choose Zil Money. If your needs are minimal or experimental, HyperPay might suffice, but data suggests it’s not actively supported or recommended.
In summary, Zil Money’s proven recent reviews, extensive features, and higher overall rating make it the better choice for most hotels today. HyperPay’s limited data and lack of features render it a less viable option unless your needs are very basic and experimental.
According to HTR's product database, HyperPay and Zil Money share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | HyperPAy |
|
|---|---|---|
| Authorization Adjustments | ||
| Gratuity Function | ||
| Multi-Currency Settlements | ||
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Recurring Payments |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tas... Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tasks. The platform’s ease of use reduces the onboarding time and enhances operational efficiency.
Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup... Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup, could make the platform even more efficient and user-friendly.
Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels... Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels' cash flow management.
Where hoteliers push back
Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations a... Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations and enhances efficiency.
Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to var... Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to varying business needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. HyperPay and Zil Money share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. HyperPay offers 1 verified integration partners, while Zil Money offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Zil Money leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
HyperPay: No. Zil Money: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. HyperPAy has an HT Score of 0 and Zil Money has 63. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor