The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
ICG FrontHotel shines , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Native Email Marketing.
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Mobile App.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 47 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, ICG FrontHotel users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
When choosing a property management system (PMS) for your hotel, your primary goal is to improve operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and ease of use. ICG Fronthotel by ICG FrontHotel and Infor HMS by Infor both aim to address these needs but differ significantly in their market presence, reviews, and feature sets. Both systems promise to streamline hotel management, yet their approaches and strengths diverge sharply. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s specific needs?
ICG FrontHotel is built around a comprehensive, integrated platform with a rich feature set, but it lacks recent reviews and a clear current rating. Conversely, Infor HMS boasts a strong reputation backed by more recent reviews, better user ratings, and a broader market presence. Can your hotel afford to overlook the latest user feedback?
ICG FrontHotel and Infor HMS serve the same core purpose but target different hotel segments and operational priorities. ICG FrontHotel emphasizes all-in-one integrations, mobile tools, and automation, making it ideal for hotels that want extensive control over operations in a single system. However, its review count remains zero, with no recent feedback, raising questions about its current performance and support.
Infor HMS, with a review count of 46 and recent reviews in the last six months, provides a more reliable picture of current user satisfaction. Its overall rating of 4.04 out of 5 and a support rating of 4.04 reflect a system that users find generally effective and supported. Do you prioritize proven, recent user feedback over a system with fewer reviews?
The core difference is that Infor HMS has more recent data, which signifies ongoing support and development. ICG FrontHotel’s lack of recent reviews could mean limited ongoing support or adoption. So, are you comfortable betting on a system that hasn’t been updated or reviewed recently?
If your hotel requires a fully integrated PMS with extensive automation, mobile check-in, and advanced features like digital registration, ICG FrontHotel might seem attractive. It offers 23 exclusive features, including guest communication, automated reminders, and integrated payment options, which could streamline complex operations.
On the other hand, if your hotel values a mature, well-supported system with a broad partner network, Infor HMS is the safer pick. It provides proven features like guest profiles, revenue management, and a mobile app, with a strong focus on operational efficiency and customizable reporting.
For hotels that need a flexible, scalable platform with recent reviews and ongoing support, Infor HMS is the clear choice. If you’re seeking a comprehensive, feature-rich solution and are willing to navigate a less-reviewed system, then ICG FrontHotel might work—though recent user feedback is absent.
Based on current reviews, Infor HMS scores a 3.88 out of 5 for ease of use, with many users appreciating its intuitive navigation and quick onboarding processes. Reviewers mention that it’s easy to locate features and manage daily tasks, though some note the interface could be more aesthetically pleasing.
ICG FrontHotel, with a review score of 0, offers no recent feedback to gauge its usability. Given the lack of reviews, it’s impossible to assess whether staff find it straightforward or challenging to adopt.
Edge: Infor HMS.
ICG FrontHotel has 23 features exclusive to its platform, including transactional emails, native email marketing, gift vouchers, automated reminders, tablet check-in, integrated ID scanners, online check-in, and real-time status updates. These features suit hotels seeking automation and guest engagement directly from their PMS.
Infor HMS offers 6 unique features, including guest profiles, revenue management modules, and a mobile app, complemented by 14 shared features. Its strengths lie in revenue optimization, customizable reporting, and seamless integrations with booking platforms.
While ICG FrontHotel provides more specialized features, Infor’s core offerings support essential hotel operations effectively.
Edge: ICG FrontHotel.
Support quality plays a crucial role in hotel software success. Infor HMS consistently receives high marks for responsiveness and professionalism, with reviews praising the support team’s ability to resolve issues quickly. Many reviewers mention that support staff guide them through problems effectively.
ICG FrontHotel, lacking recent reviews, provides no current feedback on support quality. Past feedback is unavailable, making it difficult to evaluate its current support standards or responsiveness.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts a significantly larger partner network, with 113 verified integrations, including popular platforms like Booking.com, SiteMinder, and RateGain. Shared integrations with ICG FrontHotel include HiJiffy, RoomCloud, and Onity, but Infor’s extensive network covers more operational needs.
ICG FrontHotel supports 12 verified partners, which might suffice for hotels with limited integration needs but could be restrictive for properties requiring more connectivity.
Edge: Infor HMS.
With over 46 reviews in the last six months, Infor HMS’s current overall rating of 4.04/5 and a likelihood to recommend of 74% reflect recent positive feedback. Hotels across segments—independent, branded, boutique, and resorts—rate it favorably, especially for operational efficiency and support.
ICG FrontHotel, with zero recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, provides no current data for hotel satisfaction. Its older, unverified reputation makes it less trustworthy as a decision factor.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Both products do not publicly disclose their pricing models. Typically, enterprise PMS solutions like these are priced based on hotel size, features, and support requirements, often with custom quotes.
Since no pricing details are available, your team should directly contact vendors to get tailored quotes, but keep in mind that Infor’s broader feature set and support might come at a higher initial investment.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
ICG FrontHotel offers a highly feature-rich platform with advanced automation tools, ideal for hotels seeking deep integration and control. However, with no recent reviews or current performance data, trusting its ongoing support and usability is risky.
Infor HMS provides a well-rated, widely supported system with a strong feature set, especially suited for mid-sized to large hotels prioritizing operational efficiency, revenue management, and integration. Its recent reviews and support ratings make it the safer choice, especially for properties looking for proven, ongoing vendor backing.
Choose ICG FrontHotel if your hotel needs extensive specialized features and you’re comfortable with less recent feedback. Opt for Infor HMS if you want a reliable, supported platform with broad integrations and recent positive reviews that align with your operational needs.
This comprehensive comparison should guide your team toward a decision that balances current support, features, and your hotel’s strategic priorities.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, ICG Fronthotel and Infor HMS share 14 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| On premise | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 17 more features differ between these products.
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ICG Fronthotel and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. ICG Fronthotel offers 12 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ICG Fronthotel: No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. ICG FrontHotel has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor