The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 34 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
InovGuest shines .
Shiji Group shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 34 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 34 |
After analyzing 34 verified reviews, InovGuest users most value its , while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| InovGuest |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | InovGuest |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #53 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #11 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | InovGuest |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #33 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #24 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #22 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #45 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | InovGuest |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #33 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #30 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #14 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #5 14 reviews |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is pivotal to your hotel’s operational success. Both InovGuest and Shiji Daylight PMS aim to streamline your processes, but they differ significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. This comparison reveals that Shiji Daylight PMS, with its extensive feature set and recent reviews, is the more suitable choice for most hotels. Does your property need a proven platform with broad integrations and a robust track record?
InovGuest, developed by InovGuest, offers a comprehensive PMS solution that emphasizes automation and real-time insights, but it has no recent reviews or scores, raising questions about its current performance and market presence. Shiji Daylight PMS, by contrast, boasts a score of 74.68 and 32 recent reviews, with a 90% likelihood to recommend, indicating a more validated and trusted platform.
While InovGuest claims advanced technological features, the lack of recent user feedback makes its reliability uncertain. Shiji Daylight PMS’s recent reviews highlight its user-friendly interface, extensive features, and positive user experiences, making it the safer bet. Are you willing to base your decision on an unreviewed product or a proven platform?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich PMS with proven integrations, go with Shiji Daylight PMS. It’s well-suited for properties of any size looking to centralize operations, improve guest engagement, and streamline workflows through automation and extensive integrations.
If your hotel values a supposedly comprehensive system but can compromise on recent validation, InovGuest might seem appealing. However, with zero reviews and scores indicating no current user satisfaction, it’s unlikely to meet your operational demands. For reliable, well-supported solutions, Shiji Daylight PMS is the clear choice.
Shiji Daylight PMS is rated 4.63/5 for ease of use, with reviewers praising its intuitive interface, easy training materials, and simple onboarding process. Many users comment on how quickly staff can learn and adapt, citing its user-friendly design as a key advantage.
InovGuest, on the other hand, scores 0/5 with no recent reviews to gauge its usability or onboarding process. The absence of user feedback makes it impossible to assess whether it’s easier or harder to implement. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Daylight PMS offers an impressive 98 features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, digital registration, and mobile housekeeping apps. Its capabilities cover most operational aspects, making it suitable for larger or multi-property setups.
InovGuest claims to be comprehensive but provides no detailed feature list or recent validation. With zero features verified and no recent reviews, it can’t be considered comparable. The edge clearly goes to Shiji Daylight PMS for its extensive, proven feature set.
Shiji Group’s support team consistently earns 4.53/5, with reviews highlighting their professionalism, responsiveness, and helpfulness. Many users appreciate the comprehensive onboarding materials and ongoing assistance that ease system adoption.
InovGuest’s support ratings and reviews are nonexistent, which raises concerns about the availability and quality of support. Given the importance of reliable support in PMS implementation and operation, the edge favors Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Daylight PMS integrates with 64 verified partners, including leading systems like SiteMinder, Revinate, Duetto, Amadeus, and Oaky. This extensive ecosystem enhances operational flexibility, revenue management, and marketing efforts.
InovGuest reports no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other systems important to hotel operations. For a connected, flexible tech stack, Shiji Daylight PMS clearly leads.
With 32 recent reviews, Shiji Daylight PMS is rated 74.68/100, and its likelihood to recommend stands at 90%, reflecting strong user satisfaction across hotel segments. Hotels of various sizes praise its usability, features, and support.
InovGuest has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. Based on available data, Shiji Daylight PMS’s reviews demonstrate a more trusted, highly-rated solution. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
InovGuest does not publicly disclose pricing, and its absence of reviews suggests it may not be actively marketed or adopted. Shiji Daylight PMS is listed at a base price of $1,200, with no mention of additional fees or tiered pricing.
Given the lack of transparent pricing for InovGuest, you should consider the value of proven features and support that come with Shiji Daylight PMS, which is competitively priced for its capabilities.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Shiji Daylight PMS is an established, feature-rich platform with recent validated user reviews, while InovGuest remains unreviewed with no recent data, raising reliability concerns. If your hotel seeks a trusted, well-supported PMS that can grow with your needs, Shiji Daylight PMS is the smarter choice.
Choose InovGuest only if you have specific, proven reasons for its suitability and are willing to accept the risk of limited validation and support. For most hotels, especially those aiming for operational efficiency and guest satisfaction, Shiji Daylight PMS delivers the proven, comprehensive solution you need.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| InovGuest |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, InovGuest and Shiji Daylight PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | InovGuest |
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 86 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. InovGuest and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. InovGuest offers 0 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 65. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Daylight PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
InovGuest: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. InovGuest has an HT Score of 0 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property