The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 54 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Kipsu shines when it comes to guest engagement — especially for brand properties (4.4/5) , with exclusive features like Guest History and SMS text messaging.
Reguest shines in customer support and ROI , with exclusive features like Team Messaging and Email to Chatbot Automation.
Side-by-side ratings based on 54 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 25 | 29 |
After analyzing 54 verified reviews, Kipsu users most value its guest engagement, operational efficiency, guests' preference for texting, while Reguest users highlight communication efficiency, user-friendly interface, customization and flexibility. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Guest Engagement
▾
|
+
Communication Efficiency
▾
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
+
Guests' Preference for Texting
▾
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
+
Technology Adoption
▾
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Operational Limitations
▾
|
−
Statistics and Reporting
▾
|
|
−
PMS Integration
▾
|
−
Modular and Template Limitations
▾
|
|
−
Formal Communication
▾
|
−
Mobile Accessibility
▾
|
How each product ranks among Guest Messaging Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #19 2 reviews | #9 11 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #24 4 reviews | #16 13 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #11 8 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #8 7 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #19 7 reviews | #15 11 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #12 15 reviews | #15 10 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #12 17 reviews | #23 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #19 1 reviews | #12 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #10 20 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | — | #6 28 reviews |
| Middle East | #7 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between Kipsu by Kipsu and ReGuest Guest Communication hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational priorities, and guest engagement strategies. Both products aim to improve guest communication, but they approach this goal differently, with distinct feature sets, user bases, and levels of market presence. Your decision should align with whether you prefer a straightforward guest messaging solution or an advanced CRM with integrated AI tools.
Kipsu, with its longer track record and more reviews, offers a proven, user-friendly platform favored by many mid-sized hotels and independent properties globally. ReGuest, although newer with fewer recent reviews, emphasizes advanced automation, AI-driven workflows, and extensive customization—more suited for hotels seeking a comprehensive, high-tech guest engagement ecosystem.
Are you looking for a tried-and-true guest messaging tool or a cutting-edge CRM with automation capabilities? Let’s compare these two options on key factors that matter most to your hotel.
Both Kipsu and ReGuest aim to streamline guest communication but diverge significantly in scope and sophistication. Kipsu primarily focuses on real-time mobile messaging, enabling your team to engage with guests via SMS, social media, and in-app messages. It’s a mature platform with more reviews and recent positive feedback, especially regarding ease of use and support.
ReGuest expands beyond basic messaging into a full CRM with AI-driven functionalities, omnichannel communication, and customized workflows. It offers features like digital check-in, personalized offers, and automation, making it suitable for hotels wanting to deepen guest relationships and increase revenue.
Given these differences, your choice depends on whether your hotel prioritizes simplicity and reliability or advanced automation and customization. Do you want an established messaging solution or a broad, intelligent guest communication system?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, reliable guest messaging platform that integrates easily with your existing systems, go with Kipsu. It’s ideal for properties seeking quick deployment, proven user satisfaction, and a strong support network—especially if your primary goal is immediate guest engagement and operational efficiency.
If you need a sophisticated CRM that combines automation, guest profiling, upselling, and multi-channel communication, ReGuest is your better option. It caters to hotels that want to elevate their marketing efforts, personalize guest experiences, and leverage AI to streamline workflows, albeit at a higher cost.
For mid-sized hotels and independents prioritizing proven performance, Kipsu’s extensive reviews and recent positive feedback make it the safer win. For larger properties or brands focused on customization and revenue growth, ReGuest’s advanced features justify its higher price point.
Kipsu boasts a user rating of 4.54/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and simple onboarding process. Users describe it as easy to implement, with staff quickly adopting the platform, and appreciate its desktop and mobile apps for flexibility.
ReGuest slightly outperforms in usability with a rating of 4.83/5, supported by reviews highlighting its straightforward interface, quick setup, and motivated design. However, its modular and customizable system may require more initial training and configuration, especially for complex workflows.
Edge: ReGuest.
Kipsu offers 11 features exclusive to its platform, including guest history, SMS messaging, analytics dashboards, social media integration, broadcast messaging, and task management. These are streamlined for real-time guest engagement, with a focus on messaging and operational tracking.
ReGuest provides 20 unique features, including chatbot booking, live translations, digital check-in, offer campaigns, upselling, custom fields, and comprehensive automation tools. It supports advanced workflows, AI-driven customer engagement, and multi-property management.
Overall, ReGuest has a broader feature set for automation and marketing, but Kipsu’s features are highly specialized for direct guest communication.
Edge: ReGuest.
Kipsu’s customer support is rated 3.5/5, with reviews indicating a generally good experience, but some mention delays or limitations in responsiveness. One review notes the importance of thorough demos to understand integration issues.
ReGuest impresses with a 4.97/5 support rating, and reviews cite exceptional support, quick issue resolution, and proactive engagement. Users appreciate the availability of dedicated assistance, especially during setup and troubleshooting.
Edge: ReGuest.
Kipsu integrates with 9 verified partners, including Opera, WebRezPro, and Amadeus, but its integrations are somewhat limited. Common integrations like Oracle Hospitality appear, yet some users report delays in PMS syncing.
ReGuest boasts 20 verified integrations, including major PMS and booking engines like Mews, Vertical Booking, and Simple Booking, as well as third-party services such as Flexipass and Seekda. Its wider integration ecosystem supports more complex, multi-channel workflows.
Edge: ReGuest.
Kipsu has a higher overall rating of 4.3/5, with recent reviews in the last 6 months indicating stable satisfaction and a Likelihood to Recommend of 84%. Its user base includes a variety of hotel segments, especially independent and resort properties, which rate it highly.
ReGuest, despite having fewer recent reviews, has a higher Likelihood to Recommend at 97% and a 0/5 overall rating due to limited review volume. Its users—mainly larger and luxury hotels—prefer its advanced features but note a steeper learning curve.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, Kipsu’s higher rating and broader user feedback render it the more trusted option currently.
Edge: Kipsu.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly disclosed, with no free trials or clear subscription models offered. Kipsu and ReGuest operate on customized quotes, often based on hotel size and feature needs, making direct price comparison difficult.
Both platforms generally cater to mid- to large-sized hotels willing to invest in robust guest communication solutions, but exact costs vary.
Hotels that should consider Kipsu:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that should consider ReGuest:
Not ideal if:
Kipsu is a mature, reliable guest messaging platform with a proven track record, especially suitable for properties seeking straightforward, real-time communication. Its extensive reviews, high ease of use, and supportive support make it a safe choice for most mid-sized hotels and independents.
ReGuest offers a more extensive suite of automation, AI, and marketing features, ideal for hotels aiming to build a high-tech guest engagement ecosystem. Its customizable workflows and integrations support larger or luxury properties seeking to deepen guest relationships and boost revenue.
If your priority is a trusted, easy-to-implement messaging tool, choose Kipsu. If your hotel needs advanced automation, personalization, and revenue-driving features, ReGuest is the better fit.
In summary: For reliability and proven performance, go with Kipsu. For innovation and customization, ReGuest is worth the investment.
According to HTR's product database, Kipsu and ReGuest Guest Communication share 18 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Chatbot Booking Agent | ||
| Desktop App (non-web based) | ||
| Guest History | ||
| Live Translations | ||
| Message Routing | ||
| Offer Campaigns | ||
| SMS text messaging | ||
| SMS text messaging | ||
| Team Messaging | ||
| Upselling Campaigns | ||
| Website Livechat |
Showing top differences. 19 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Kipsu empowers hotels to engage with guests promptly via mobile communication, enhancing guest satisfaction and allowing immediate issue resolution. S... Kipsu empowers hotels to engage with guests promptly via mobile communication, enhancing guest satisfaction and allowing immediate issue resolution. Several reviews highlight its ease of use and the preference of guests to text rather than call.
Kipsu helps hotels by making communication more efficient. It allows front desk staff to handle guest queries quickly and track their usage of the app... Kipsu helps hotels by making communication more efficient. It allows front desk staff to handle guest queries quickly and track their usage of the app. There is a noted improvement in task management and operational flow among teams.
The shift from phone calls to texting aligns with guests’ preferences, making it easier for them to communicate their needs discreetly. This trend is... The shift from phone calls to texting aligns with guests’ preferences, making it easier for them to communicate their needs discreetly. This trend is particularly beneficial for tech-savvy and mobile-centric guests.
Where hoteliers push back
While many find Kipsu user-friendly, some note that it could be more robust. Limitations include the scope of the program and occasional hiccups with... While many find Kipsu user-friendly, some note that it could be more robust. Limitations include the scope of the program and occasional hiccups with searching archived messages efficiently.
Many users highlight the need for better integration with property management systems (PMS), noting delays and sync issues. Proper integration would f... Many users highlight the need for better integration with property management systems (PMS), noting delays and sync issues. Proper integration would further streamline communication by automatically updating guest details, which currently is a manual process for some.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
ReGuest stands out for its efficient chat functions, allowing quick and intuitive guest communication which simplifies operations and enhances guest s... ReGuest stands out for its efficient chat functions, allowing quick and intuitive guest communication which simplifies operations and enhances guest satisfaction.
The platform is acknowledged for its user-friendly interface, with quick, intuitive handling and a motivating design that is appreciated by many users... The platform is acknowledged for its user-friendly interface, with quick, intuitive handling and a motivating design that is appreciated by many users.
ReGuest's modular system offers flexibility and personalization but increases costs, which is a concern for some users.
Where hoteliers push back
The system provides clear and fast statistics, although some users wish for more detailed analyses, particularly of specific messages.
While offering some customizable options, the platform has limited self-implementing features and intuitive setup for new templates.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Kipsu and ReGuest Guest Communication share many core Guest Messaging Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Kipsu offers 9 verified integration partners, while ReGuest Guest Communication offers 20. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ReGuest Guest Communication leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Kipsu: No. ReGuest Guest Communication: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Guest Messaging Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Kipsu has an HT Score of 14 and Reguest has 76. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor