The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 893 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Kwentra shines in customer support and ROI , with exclusive features like On premise.
Mews shines when it comes to customization and flexibility — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 893 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 7 | 886 |
After analyzing 893 verified reviews, Kwentra users most value its , while Mews users highlight customization and flexibility, automation and efficiency, onboarding and support experience. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Automation
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing Complexity and Reporting Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Revenue Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing and Fees
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #68 1 reviews | #3 329 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #50 3 reviews | #1 397 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #29 3 reviews | #3 45 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #3 49 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #52 3 reviews | #1 483 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #49 3 reviews | #5 220 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #58 1 reviews | #2 170 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 130 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #66 0 reviews | #8 106 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #9 6 reviews | #28 8 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can dramatically impact your hotel’s efficiency, guest satisfaction, and profitability. Both Kwentra and Mews PMS aim to streamline operations but approach it differently; Kwentra blends legacy systems with cloud solutions, while Mews offers a fully cloud-native platform with extensive integrations. As your decision nears, consider how recent reviews and user feedback substantiate their strengths.
Kwentra’s near-perfect ratings are based on only six reviews, with the last being over a year ago, which limits current data. Conversely, Mews boasts over 750 reviews, with 98 recent ones in the past six months, making it the more reliable choice today. Do you prioritize a system with sustained user confidence and ongoing innovation?
Both Kwentra and Mews address core hotel management needs: reservations, billing, guest communication, and reporting. Kwentra’s ecosystem combines traditional legacy strengths with cloud flexibility, appealing to hotels seeking a hybrid approach that retains familiar features. Mews, however, focuses entirely on cloud-native solutions, emphasizing automation, real-time data, and extensive third-party integrations.
Kwentra’s standout feature is on-premise deployment, which can be critical for hotels with strict data policies or limited internet access. Mews, on the other hand, offers a modern, mobile-friendly interface praised for quick adoption and remote management. Which approach aligns better with your operational priorities?
If your hotel needs a traditional, hybrid system with a strong legacy backbone, Kwentra’s ecosystem might be suitable—especially for properties in regions where on-premise deployment remains important. Its high ease of use (4.83/5) and outstanding support rating (4.83/5) suggest a stable, well-supported platform, particularly for properties managing complex, multi-system environments.
If your hotel prioritizes scalability, automation, and global connectivity, Mews is the clear choice. Its superior review count, recent positive feedback, and extensive marketplace of over 1,000 integrations make it ideal for hotels seeking flexibility, innovation, and a future-proof system. For hotels ready to leverage the latest in cloud tech, Mews outperforms Kwentra on every metric.
Kwentra’s user ratings (4.83/5) and onboarding scores (4.75/5) indicate a highly intuitive platform, with users praising the helpful support team and straightforward setup. Its interface, though less modern than Mews, remains familiar to hotels with legacy systems, easing staff adoption.
Mews receives similarly high ratings (4.7/5), with users emphasizing its modern, clean design and ease of use across devices. Recent reviews highlight Mews’ quick onboarding, with some mentioning that initial setup can be a bit complex but is ultimately manageable due to responsive support.
Edge: Kwentra.
Kwentra offers 46 shared features plus one exclusive in-house feature, and it uniquely provides on-premise deployment. Its features include reservation management, billing, reports, and some finance integrations—fitting for properties needing a hybrid system.
Mews surpasses in feature count, offering 46 shared features plus 13 unique ones like multi-lingual support, guest CRM, native email marketing, guest app, and housekeeper mobile app. Its focus on automation and guest interaction tools makes it more adaptable for modern hotels.
Edge: Mews.
Kwentra’s reviews (4.83/5) praise its responsive, helpful team, with comments like “The Cloudinn Team is very helpful,” and “Quick response times.” Its support seems tailored to properties that favor a more personalized, high-touch approach.
Mews’ support (4.27/5) is generally good but has mixed recent reviews. Some users note occasional bugs and support delays; however, the team’s rapid issue resolution and proactive updates are appreciated. Still, Kwentra’s support ratings are slightly higher, reflecting consistent, high-quality service.
Edge: Kwentra.
Mews offers a far broader ecosystem with 336 verified partners, including critical integrations like SiteMinder, Onity, and Sage, plus a marketplace of over 1,000 third-party solutions. Its open API and extensive ecosystem provide significant flexibility for hotel customization.
Kwentra has 18 verified partners, including key players like Expedia and Hotel Data Cloud but fewer options overall. Its integrations are sufficient for properties with limited third-party needs but less suited for complex or rapidly evolving tech stacks.
Edge: Mews.
Mews enjoys a higher overall rating (4.62/5) with over 750 reviews, including 98 recent ones, indicating current user satisfaction. Hotels across segments like boutique, independent, and branded properties consistently rate Mews highly, especially for ease of use and support.
Kwentra’s reviews, though perfectly positive (5/5), are limited in number and outdated, making it less reliable for current judgment. Hotels that value ongoing innovation and recent user feedback will favor Mews’ higher ratings.
Edge: Mews.
Kwentra does not publicly disclose its pricing, suggesting a tailored quote based on hotel size and needs. It does not offer a free trial or freemium model, which may impact smaller properties or those testing systems.
Mews charges a base fee of $900 per month, with no free trial or implementation fee. Its transparent pricing and flexible packages make it easier to evaluate ROI upfront, especially for mid-sized and larger hotels.
Not ideal if you need rapid scalability or extensive third-party integrations, as Kwentra’s ecosystem is smaller.
Not recommended if your hotel requires on-premise deployment or has very limited internet access, as Mews is fully cloud-based.
Mews offers a modern, cloud-native PMS with a large ecosystem, extensive integrations, and a proven track record backed by hundreds of recent reviews. It’s ideal for properties that want to future-proof their operations, enhance guest experiences, and scale easily.
Kwentra remains a solid option for hotels needing a hybrid legacy-cloud system with on-premise deployment, high support levels, and a niche in traditional environments. However, its limited recent feedback makes it less attractive for properties seeking ongoing innovation.
If your hotel values comprehensive features, a robust third-party marketplace, and recent positive feedback, Mews is the clear choice. For hotels that need a hybrid system with high-touch support and regional deployment, Kwentra might still be suitable—but only if you’re comfortable with less current data.
In conclusion, given the volume of recent reviews and the breadth of features, Mews is the stronger option for most modern hotels looking to grow and innovate.
According to HTR's product database, kwentra and Mews PMS share 46 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| On premise |
Showing top differences. 2 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that... Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that more advanced configuration options, particularly in report generation and billing, could enhance the platform’s utility further.
The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on deliverin... The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on delivering a superior guest experience. However, some reviews mention that while automation works well, the billing process can sometimes be complex.
The onboarding experience with Mews has been inconsistent, with some users praising the hands-on approach while others faced challenges with initial s... The onboarding experience with Mews has been inconsistent, with some users praising the hands-on approach while others faced challenges with initial setup efficiency. The support team's responsiveness has improved over time, enhancing problem resolution and user satisfaction.
Where hoteliers push back
While Mews automates billing, users report difficulties with its complexity and limitations in reporting and analytics. Enhancing these areas could pr... While Mews automates billing, users report difficulties with its complexity and limitations in reporting and analytics. Enhancing these areas could provide better insights and flexibility for users managing financial operations.
Mews provides a strong foundation for revenue management with its integration capabilities, but users indicate opportunities for improvement in dynami... Mews provides a strong foundation for revenue management with its integration capabilities, but users indicate opportunities for improvement in dynamic pricing tools and advanced analytics, especially in multi-property operations.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. kwentra and Mews PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. kwentra offers 18 verified integration partners, while Mews PMS offers 336. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Mews PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.4/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
kwentra: No. Mews PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Kwentra has an HT Score of 0 and Mews has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor