The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 38 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
LasoExperience shines .
Runtriz shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 38 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 38 |
After analyzing 38 verified reviews, LasoExperience users most value its , while Runtriz users highlight guest communication, user experience, check-in process. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Guest Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
User Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Check-in Process
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Generation
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customizability
▾
|
|
|
−
Guest Misunderstanding
▾
|
|
|
−
Notification and Alerts
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Guest Apps vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #13 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 33 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #12 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #9 11 reviews |
| Luxury | — | #15 3 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 34 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #2 24 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #1 37 reviews |
| Europe | — | #34 0 reviews |
Choosing the right guest engagement platform hinges on a range of factors, from user experience to integration capabilities. LasoExperience by LasoExperience and Runtriz by Runtriz both aim to improve guest communication and operational efficiency, but they diverge significantly in market presence, user ratings, and feature depth. Your decision should reflect your hotel’s priorities—whether it's ease of use, feature set, or support for specific hotel segments.
While LasoExperience touts a comprehensive guest relationship approach, its limited review data and absence of recent reviews reduce confidence in its current performance. Conversely, Runtriz’s strong recent reviews and broad industry use make it the more reliable choice today.
LasoExperience aims to elevate guest satisfaction through personalized digital interactions across web, mobile, and SMS channels, focusing heavily on guest relationship management. Runtriz, on the other hand, emphasizes guest communication, contactless check-in, and operational features like mobile keys and payments.
Both platforms target similar problems—streamlining communication and enhancing guest experience—but Runtriz’s reviews highlight its proven, scalable solutions, while LasoExperience's lack of recent feedback leaves its effectiveness uncertain. Do you need a proven, well-reviewed platform or a more customizable but less tested system?
If your hotel needs a highly-rated, easy-to-use guest engagement platform with proven success across various hotel types, go with Runtriz. Its 37 recent reviews and an overall rating of 4.77/5, along with a 8.97/5 NPS, underscore its industry trust and customer satisfaction.
If your team prioritizes hyper-personalized guest relationships and advanced marketing automation, LasoExperience could be appealing. However, with no recent reviews and a score of 0/5, it’s difficult to justify over the more established, reviewed option—especially considering Runtriz's more extensive feature set and broader integrations.
Runtriz consistently receives high marks for user-friendliness, with a 4.66/5 ease of use rating and multiple reviews praising its straightforward interface. Users note it’s simple for staff and guests alike, with some mentioning that even less tech-savvy staff find it manageable.
LasoExperience, however, scores 0/5 in ease of use and has no recent reviews to gauge its onboarding or staff adoption. Without recent feedback, it's impossible to assess its usability, but the lack of reviews already indicates limited industry validation.
Edge: Runtriz.
Runtriz offers a suite of 11 shared features, along with one exclusive—payments—which enhances revenue opportunities. It supports contactless check-in, mobile keys, guest messaging, and loyalty integrations, making it a comprehensive operational tool.
LasoExperience provides no unique features outside its core guest relationship functions. Its absence of specific features like payments or mobile check-in makes it less versatile. With only shared features and no unique tools, Runtriz’s feature set delivers more tangible benefits.
Edge: Runtriz.
Runtriz’s support ratings reflect an average of 4.51/5, with multiple reviews praising its ease of implementation and ongoing support. Users describe its onboarding as smooth and support responsiveness as generally satisfactory.
LasoExperience has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making it difficult to evaluate. Given the lack of recent feedback, Runtriz’s established support model clearly offers more reassurance.
Edge: Runtriz.
Runtriz boasts 14 verified integrations, including major PMS and access control providers like Oracle Hospitality, SALTO, and Infor. It supports extensive third-party connections that align with large and diverse hotel operations.
LasoExperience integrates with only three verified partners, including Maestro PMS and Book4Time, but lacks the breadth of Runtriz’s ecosystem. For hotels needing a platform that connects seamlessly with existing systems, Runtriz’s wider integration network is a distinct advantage.
Edge: Runtriz.
Runtriz’s hotel reviews are recent and plentiful, with an overall rating of 4.77/5 based on 37 reviews, and an NPS of 8.97/5. This indicates high satisfaction across various hotel types, including branded, boutique, and resort segments. It’s especially popular among properties looking for reliable, scalable engagement solutions.
LasoExperience’s review count is zero, and its score is 0/5, so current hotel ratings are unavailable. The absence of recent reviews makes Runtriz the clear leader in hotel satisfaction ratings.
Edge: Runtriz.
Both platforms do not publicly disclose their pricing models. They offer no free trials, monthly flat rates, or implementation fees, leaving potential buyers to inquire directly for quotes. As a result, assessing value requires vendor engagement.
Given the transparency about Runtriz’s broader feature set and proven support, it’s likely to offer a competitive pricing structure aligned with industry standards for scalable guest engagement platforms.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a ready-made, well-reviewed engagement platform with proven operational features. LasoExperience is less suitable for hotels requiring immediate, industry-tested solutions.
Not ideal if your hotel has very limited technology infrastructure or prefers a platform with extensive AI-driven personalization and marketing automation. Runtriz’s focus is on operational functionality and integration.
LasoExperience and Runtriz serve similar markets but differ vastly in current validation and feature breadth. LasoExperience offers a highly personalized approach but lacks recent reviews and proven industry performance, making it less reliable for decision-makers today.
Runtriz, with its 37 recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive integrations, emerges as the more dependable, well-supported choice. It’s particularly suited for hotels seeking a scalable, easy-to-use platform backed by real-world success stories.
Choose Runtriz if you want a solution with proven results, broad features, and ongoing support. Opt for LasoExperience only if your hotel is prepared to take a risk on an emerging system and values hyper-personalized guest engagement above all.
Hotel Guest Apps pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Laso Experience and Runtriz share 11 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Payments |
What hoteliers love
Runtriz is praised for its ability to facilitate easy and efficient communication between hotel staff and guests. It supports pre-arrival notification... Runtriz is praised for its ability to facilitate easy and efficient communication between hotel staff and guests. It supports pre-arrival notifications, real-time messaging, and service requests, which improves guest satisfaction and operational efficiency.
The platform is generally considered user-friendly and straightforward for both staff and guests. However, some users noted that the interface could b... The platform is generally considered user-friendly and straightforward for both staff and guests. However, some users noted that the interface could be more modern and visually appealing, suggesting potential areas for aesthetic improvements.
The tool streamlines and expedites check-in with features like mobile pre-check-in and real-time notifications, reducing wait times and enhancing the... The tool streamlines and expedites check-in with features like mobile pre-check-in and real-time notifications, reducing wait times and enhancing the guest experience. However, some issues with proper integration and guest understanding of pre-check-in were noted.
Where hoteliers push back
Runtriz allows a high degree of customization in setting templates and automating responses, which users found beneficial for streamlining operations... Runtriz allows a high degree of customization in setting templates and automating responses, which users found beneficial for streamlining operations and enhancing guest interaction. However, improvement in backend support for these features was suggested.
Some guests misunderstand the pre-check-in process, thinking it means they are fully checked in, leading to confusion and dissatisfaction. Clearer com... Some guests misunderstand the pre-check-in process, thinking it means they are fully checked in, leading to confusion and dissatisfaction. Clearer communication and instructions could mitigate these issues.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Laso Experience and Runtriz share many core Hotel Guest Apps features, but each has unique capabilities. Laso Experience offers 3 verified integration partners, while Runtriz offers 14. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Runtriz leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Laso Experience: No. Runtriz: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Guest Apps vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. LasoExperience has an HT Score of 0 and Runtriz has 21. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor