The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 142 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Blastness shines in pricing optimization and revenue strategy — especially for boutique properties (5.0/5), with exclusive features like Open Pricing and 24-Months Pricing & Forecasting.
LodgIQ shines in pricing and rate strategy — especially for boutique properties (4.9/5), with exclusive features like Mobile App and Mobile Friendly Design.
Side-by-side ratings based on 142 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 107 | 35 |
After analyzing 142 verified reviews, Blastness users most value its pricing optimization and revenue strategy, customer support and account responsiveness, ease of use and intuitive workflows, while LodgIQ users highlight pricing and rate strategy, forecasting and demand visibility, market intelligence and competitor insights. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Pricing optimization and revenue strategy
▾
|
+
Pricing and rate strategy
▾
|
|
+
Customer support and account responsiveness
▾
|
+
Forecasting and demand visibility
▾
|
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive workflows
▾
|
+
Market intelligence and competitor insights
▾
|
|
+
Reporting, forecasting, and analytics
▾
|
+
Automation and decision support
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization, flexibility, and advanced configuration
▾
|
−
Business analytics and reporting
▾
|
|
−
Brand-specific BI and benchmarking gaps
▾
|
|
|
−
Forecast, budget, and channel performance visibility
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Revenue Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #10 43 reviews | #32 3 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #8 52 reviews | #26 6 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #23 3 reviews | #9 11 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #8 5 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #11 43 reviews | #18 21 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #7 48 reviews | #14 24 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #9 25 reviews | #14 17 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #20 3 reviews | #28 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #21 2 reviews | #7 30 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #10 99 reviews | #31 4 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #15 1 reviews | #16 0 reviews |
Blastness and LodgIQ both serve the core purpose of enabling hotels to optimize their pricing strategies through dynamic revenue management. They analyze market data, competitor activity, and demand fluctuations to recommend rates that maximize revenue. However, they diverge in key operational approaches and feature depth.
Blastness is designed for hotels seeking advanced pricing flexibility and a dual-channel revenue management approach that separately optimizes direct and OTA pricing to increase direct bookings and reduce distribution costs. Its open pricing, multi-price structures, and inventory controls cater to hotels aiming for granular rate management. LodgIQ focuses on integrating revenue management with forecasting, market intelligence, and conversational AI, emphasizing explainable recommendations and business intelligence dashboards to support commercial teams. It is more oriented towards comprehensive revenue operations rather than just pricing.
Both products solve the fundamental problem of helping hotel revenue teams make faster, more accurate pricing decisions that reflect real-time market conditions and internal performance data.
If your property prioritizes sophisticated pricing controls such as dual revenue management across direct and OTA channels, multi-price levels, or extended stay pricing, Blastness fits best. This is supported by Blastness’s 7 unique features focused on pricing innovation, including Open Price Advanced and Component/virtual room pricing, and its strong user ratings in boutique (5/5 from 44 reviews) and luxury hotels (4.9/5 from 49 reviews). Blastness users also emphasize its PMS integration and channel management for operational efficiency.
If your hotel values integrated revenue operations beyond pricing—such as multi-property management, detailed forecasting, displacement analysis, and group pricing—LodgIQ offers 16 unique features tailored to these workflows. Its data analytics dashboard, open API, and mobile-friendly design make it suitable for commercial teams needing broad business intelligence and market insight. LodgIQ’s strength is evident in its user ratings among branded hotels (4.7/5 from 17 reviews) and city center hotels (4.8/5 from 18 reviews). However, LodgIQ’s pricing model starts at $800 monthly, which might not fit smaller independents.
Data for smaller segments like extended stay is thin for both products, limiting recommendation confidence there. LodgIQ’s slower review volume (35 total vs. Blastness’s 107) and fewer recent reviews suggest less current user feedback, while Blastness’s recent review activity has dropped sharply, potentially masking recent product shifts.
Blastness scores 4.9/5 for ease of use and 4.9/5 onboarding; LodgIQ scores 4.8/5 and 4.7/5 respectively. Both systems receive praise for intuitive user interfaces that accommodate users without deep revenue management backgrounds. Blastness reviewers highlight ease of navigation and clear instructions, while LodgIQ users commend its clean design and straightforward data digestion.
However, some Blastness users note complexity in booking processes and wish for simplified workflows, while LodgIQ reviewers mention minor usability improvements in report exporting and screen formatting. Both products support quick adoption by front desk and revenue managers but require some training for advanced features.
Edge: Even.
Blastness offers 7 unique, hotel-centric features focusing on pricing flexibility: Open Pricing, 24-month pricing and forecasting, lost business data capture, inventory management, business intelligence, component/virtual room pricing, and extended stay pricing. These features enable hotels to control pricing structures tightly and adapt to long-term trends, important for properties with complex inventory or seasonality patterns.
LodgIQ provides 16 unique features emphasizing revenue operations breadth: an analytics dashboard, open API, Single Sign-On, group pricing and evaluation, multi-property management, dynamic price hierarchy control, alternate stay date recommendations, “what-if” scenario analysis, sell-out and cancellation management, business mix optimization, STR data integration, displacement analysis, and mobile app/accessibility. These features support comprehensive market analysis, group business management, and operational flexibility across property portfolios.
Both share 37 features typical for revenue management systems. Hotels needing granular pricing at room-type and channel level benefit more from Blastness, while those requiring integrated market intelligence and multi-property controls benefit from LodgIQ.
Edge: LodgIQ.
Both Blastness and LodgIQ score 4.9/5 in customer support, with Blastness rated 4.9/5 onboarding and LodgIQ 4.7/5. Blastness users consistently praise its responsive, knowledgeable, and proactive support teams, citing efficiency and fast issue resolution over several years. Some mention a desire for extended hours to cover weekends.
LodgIQ reviewers also commend their support for responsiveness and thorough communication, though a few report slower response times during peak periods and wish for quicker issue resolution. Both vendors maintain high satisfaction but LodgIQ’s slightly lower onboarding rating suggests a marginally steeper initial learning curve or less hands-on guidance.
Edge: Even.
LodgIQ has 26 verified integrations, 53% more than Blastness’s 17. Both share integrations with major PMS and distribution systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, Host Hotel Systems, and Aven Hospitality.
Blastness uniquely integrates with Upsellguru GmbH, Asksuite, MyForecast, hotelcube, 5Stelle, Vertical Booking, innRoad, hoteliga International sp. z o.o., and Qualitando. These partners serve specialized marketing, forecasting, and channel management needs, supporting hotels focused on direct bookings and local distribution.
LodgIQ adds partners such as HQ Revenue, Otelier, Stayntouch, SiteMinder, RMS, RateGain, protel, Actabl, and Lighthouse, enhancing multi-property management, market intelligence, and channel distribution breadth. LodgIQ’s mobile app and open API integrations are particularly valuable for hotels requiring scalable, connected ecosystems.
Edge: LodgIQ.
Blastness holds a 5/5 overall rating based on 107 reviews, versus LodgIQ’s 4.8/5 from 35 reviews. Both have nearly identical likelihood to recommend (99% Blastness, 96% LodgIQ). Recent review volume has dropped sharply for Blastness (6 in last 6 months vs. 20.8 average previously), while LodgIQ maintains low but steady recent activity (5 reviews).
By segment, Blastness excels in boutique hotels (5/5 from 44 reviews), bed & breakfast (4.9/5 from 21), luxury hotels (4.9/5 from 49), and resorts (4.9/5 from 28). LodgIQ leads in branded hotels (4.7/5 from 17), casinos (4.8/5 from 9), and city center hotels (4.8/5 from 18). Both products rate similarly within luxury hotel segments (Blastness 4.9/5, LodgIQ 4.8/5).
The volume and recency suggest Blastness ratings reflect broader historic satisfaction but may not capture recent product changes, while LodgIQ’s smaller base limits rating confidence.
Edge: Even.
Blastness does not publish pricing, does not offer freemium or trial, and reports no implementation fees, suggesting a custom pricing model likely based on property size or package.
LodgIQ publishes a base price starting at $800 per month, with no freemium, trial, or implementation fees. Pricing is not per room but likely tiered by features or property scale.
Hotels seeking transparent, upfront pricing may prefer LodgIQ, while Blastness customers must engage sales for a quote.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Blastness and LodgIQ both equip hotels to optimize revenue through data-driven pricing and forecasting, but they embody fundamentally different approaches. Blastness focuses on pricing flexibility and distribution control, enabling hotels to manage direct and OTA channels distinctly and apply complex rate structures. LodgIQ delivers a broader revenue operations platform that integrates forecasting, market intelligence, group management, and mobile access for commercial teams.
Choose Blastness if your hotel prioritizes advanced pricing strategies such as dual revenue management, multi-price levels, and extended stay pricing, all supported by strong PMS integration and high user ratings in boutique and luxury segments. Its ability to increase direct bookings and detailed inventory management suits independent hotels and resorts aiming to reduce OTA dependence.
Opt for LodgIQ if you operate a branded or multi-property hotel requiring comprehensive business intelligence, group pricing evaluation, and displacement analysis. LodgIQ’s published pricing, open API, and mobile-friendly design make it ideal for commercial teams needing scalable, integrated revenue insights with explainable AI recommendations.
Note that Blastness’s review volume and satisfaction are high but have declined sharply in recent months, which may indicate changes in product or support that are not yet fully reflected in ratings. LodgIQ’s smaller but steady review base offers consistent feedback but with less breadth. Your final choice should weigh pricing transparency, feature fit, and the nature of your revenue operations team.
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Pricing Optimization
|
|
|
| Price Explanation | ||
| Enterprise Business Guidelines | ||
| Alternate Stay Date Recommendations | ||
| Alternate Property Reccomendations | ||
| Real-time price optimization | ||
| Dynamic Price Hierarchy Control | ||
| Open Pricing | ||
| Guided workflows | ||
| "What-if" scenario analysis | ||
| Dynamic Pricing | ||
| Set Boundaries | ||
| Manage Exceptions | ||
| Group Pricing | ||
| Manage Restrictions | ||
| Manage Sell-Outs & Cancellations | ||
| Business Mix Optimization | ||
| Define Cycles | ||
| Yield Room Types Individually | ||
| Bulk Adjustments | ||
| 24-Months Pricing & Forecasting | ||
| Component/virtual room pricing | ||
| Extended stay pricing | ||
| Upsell pricing | ||
| Hurdle rate | ||
|
▾
Market Intelligence & Forecasting
|
|
|
| Five-Year Forecasting | ||
| 365-Day Forward Pricing | ||
| STR Data | ||
| 18-Month Forward Pricing | ||
| Price sensitivity modeling | ||
| Multi-Property Dashboard | ||
| Market Intelligence Data | ||
| Interactive Customizable Dashboards | ||
| Future Market Demand Data | ||
| Financial Forecast Builder | ||
| Extended stay forecasting | ||
| Channel forecasting | ||
| Forecast explanation | ||
| Flexible competitor data | ||
|
▾
Dashboards & Reporting
|
|
|
| Custom Reports | ||
| Scheduled Reports | ||
| Lost Business Data | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Interactive Customizable Dashboards | ||
| Market Insights Reporting | ||
| Pickup Analysis | ||
| Booking Pattern Analysis | ||
| Event Data | ||
| Price Change Logs | ||
| Customizable Notifications & Alerts | ||
| Displacement Analysis | ||
| Group Pricing & Evaluation | ||
| Multi-Property Dashboard | ||
| System benefit measurement | ||
|
▾
Automation
|
|
|
| Controlled Automation/Algorithm Customization | ||
| Automated Room-Type Pricing | ||
| Fully automated revenue management | ||
| Dynamic Pricing | ||
| AI Optimization | ||
| Automatic Pricing Updates | ||
|
▾
Multi-Property Functionality
|
|
|
| Inventory Management | ||
| Multi-property Management | ||
| Multi-Property Dashboard | ||
|
▾
Group Business
|
|
|
| Group Pricing & Evaluation | ||
| "What-if" scenario analysis | ||
| Displacement Analysis | ||
| Group forecast and wash | ||
|
▾
Integrations
|
|
|
| Open API | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Business Intelligence | ||
| STR Data | ||
| Property Management System | ||
| Multi-factor authentication | ||
|
▾
Other
|
|
|
| Group pricing & evaluation | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Smart Spreading Technology | ||
| Single Sign-On | ||
| Mobile Friendly Design |
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Thanks to Blastness, we not only increased our direct bookings and RevPAR, but also gained the confidence to make smarter, data-driven decisions that shape the future of our resort..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
A core value theme is helping hotels set better rates and stay competitive through RMS-driven pricing, demand-based strategy, and revenue analysis. Re... A core value theme is helping hotels set better rates and stay competitive through RMS-driven pricing, demand-based strategy, and revenue analysis. Reviewers highlight daily pricing updates, stronger revenue control, and better rate decisions, though one notes the model can overemphasize market pressure and miss property-specific pickup.
Support quality is one of Blastness's strongest recurring themes, with users praising knowledgeable, fast, and proactive staff. A smaller but importan... Support quality is one of Blastness's strongest recurring themes, with users praising knowledgeable, fast, and proactive staff. A smaller but important set of comments asks for broader availability, especially 24/7 or holiday coverage, and faster helpdesk email response times.
Many reviewers describe the platform as clear, intuitive, and easy to manage, especially for daily rate and reservation tasks. At the same time, some... Many reviewers describe the platform as clear, intuitive, and easy to manage, especially for daily rate and reservation tasks. At the same time, some say certain workflows are still too cumbersome or too complex, particularly when changing prices, managing promotions, or navigating booking steps.
Where hoteliers push back
Several reviewers want more control over how the system behaves, from custom dashboards and reporting templates to pricing rules, room-type changes, a... Several reviewers want more control over how the system behaves, from custom dashboards and reporting templates to pricing rules, room-type changes, and workflow simplification. This topic appears as a recurring opportunity to make the platform better fit complex hotel operations and specialized revenue setups.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Reviewers consistently say LodgIQ helps simplify room-type pricing and supports smarter rate decisions. Users value the ability to manage pricing more... Reviewers consistently say LodgIQ helps simplify room-type pricing and supports smarter rate decisions. Users value the ability to manage pricing more efficiently while keeping the revenue manager involved in final decisions.
The platform is frequently credited with improving forecast visibility and helping teams anticipate demand trends. Reviewers mention that this support... The platform is frequently credited with improving forecast visibility and helping teams anticipate demand trends. Reviewers mention that this supports more proactive revenue management and better responses to market movement.
Users highlight LodgIQ’s market intelligence as useful for tracking market movement and understanding demand conditions. This helps revenue teams reac... Users highlight LodgIQ’s market intelligence as useful for tracking market movement and understanding demand conditions. This helps revenue teams react more quickly and position rates more competitively.
Where hoteliers push back
The product is seen as strong in business analytics overall, but some users feel the reporting layer is not yet fully tailored to all hotel types. Rev... The product is seen as strong in business analytics overall, but some users feel the reporting layer is not yet fully tailored to all hotel types. Reviewers want richer dashboards and more actionable visibility into performance metrics.
A major concern is that LodgIQ’s analytics and reporting feel better suited to independent hotels than branded portfolios. Reviewers want deeper brand... A major concern is that LodgIQ’s analytics and reporting feel better suited to independent hotels than branded portfolios. Reviewers want deeper brand-data integration, stronger benchmarking, and portfolio-level reporting to make the system more useful for larger ownership groups.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. Blastness Revenue Management System and LodgIQ share many core Revenue Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Blastness Revenue Management System offers 17 verified integration partners, while LodgIQ offers 26. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Blastness Revenue Management System leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.8/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Blastness Revenue Management System: No. LodgIQ: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Revenue Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Blastness has an HT Score of 83 and LodgIQ has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property