The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 48 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
LodgIQ shines when it comes to technical issues and support response , with exclusive features like Mobile App.
SHR Group shines , with exclusive features like Open Pricing and Price Explanation.
Side-by-side ratings based on 48 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 31 | 17 |
After analyzing 48 verified reviews, LodgIQ users most value its technical issues and support response, data analysis and reporting, user-friendly interface, while SHR Group users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Technical Issues and Support Response
▾
|
|
|
+
Data Analysis and Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
How each product ranks among Revenue Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #30 3 reviews | #33 3 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #26 6 reviews | #29 8 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #10 7 reviews | #20 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #9 5 reviews | #14 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #20 18 reviews | #32 8 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #15 21 reviews | #30 7 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #14 17 reviews | #22 7 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #26 2 reviews | #29 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #6 28 reviews | #17 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #31 3 reviews | #26 7 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #16 0 reviews | — |
| Middle East | — | #10 3 reviews |
Choosing the right revenue management system (RMS) is vital for your hotel's profitability and operational efficiency. LodgIQ by LodgIQ and SHR Revenue Management System (RMS) by SHR Group both aim to optimize your pricing, forecast demand, and streamline revenue strategies. While LodgIQ emphasizes advanced AI-driven analytics with a user-friendly interface, SHR RMS offers a comprehensive platform with automation features and a strategic "Strategy builder." How do these systems compare in real-world hotel applications?
Both LodgIQ and SHR RMS aim to increase your hotel's revenue through data analysis and forecasting. LodgIQ leverages artificial intelligence and machine learning to provide precise, adaptive pricing recommendations, often praised for its intuitive interface and market insight data. SHR RMS, however, emphasizes full automation, demand forecasting, and strategic customization, making it suitable for hotels seeking more control and a broader feature set.
LodgIQ, with its focus on real-time analytics and a sleek dashboard, is often preferred by hotels that value ease of use and detailed market insights. SHR RMS appeals more to hotels that want extensive automation, demand forecasting, and the ability to craft bespoke revenue strategies. Which system aligns more with your hotel's operational style and strategic needs?
If your hotel needs a highly intuitive platform with advanced AI that simplifies data digestibility, LodgIQ is the better pick. Its user-friendly interface, detailed market intelligence data, and focus on actionable insights make it ideal for hotels prioritizing ease of use and rapid decision-making.
On the other hand, if your hotel requires a more comprehensive tool with full automation, demand forecasting for multiple segments, and a flexible strategy builder, SHR RMS might be better suited. Its broader feature set—including inventory management and 24-month forecasting—serves larger or more complex operations aiming for tight control over revenue strategies.
For independent hotels seeking simplicity and quick insights, LodgIQ is often more suitable. Larger properties or chains with complex revenue structures may benefit more from SHR RMS's automation and customization capabilities. Which approach aligns better with your hotel's size and operational complexity?
LodgIQ boasts a user-friendly interface, with a 4.67/5 ease of use rating based on reviews that highlight its intuitive navigation and simple data analysis. Users praise its visual dashboards, customizable reports, and straightforward onboarding process, with many noting that staff quickly adapt to the system.
SHR RMS, slightly higher at 4.87/5, is also regarded as easy to operate, especially for teams familiar with revenue management tools. Its automation and the "Strategy builder" feature allow for a more streamlined experience once set up, though initial configuration may be more involved.
Edge: SHR Group
LodgIQ offers 14 features unique to its platform, including a sophisticated analytics dashboard, channel management, open API, real-time price optimization, and mobile app access. These features support detailed market analysis, dynamic pricing, and flexible integration, making it highly adaptable to various hotel needs.
SHR RMS provides 6 exclusive features, notably its "Open Pricing" and "Strategy builder," as well as 24-month forecasting and inventory management. Its automation tools enable full control of revenue strategies, especially for hotels with complex or segmented markets.
While LodgIQ’s feature count is higher, SHR RMS’s automation and strategic tools cater to hotels needing more control over their revenue management processes. Which set of features aligns better with your hotel’s operational priorities?
Edge: LodgIQ
LodgIQ has an average support rating of 4.88/5, with reviews emphasizing its responsive and helpful team. Many users commend LodgIQ’s proactive support and the team’s willingness to listen to customer feedback, though some mention occasional delays in technical issue resolution.
SHR RMS slightly outperforms with a 4.93/5 support rating, with reviewers highlighting their satisfaction with quick responses and proactive service. One hotelier lauded SHR’s support as “helpful and positive,” reflecting consistent reliability.
Edge: SHR Group
LodgIQ integrates with 25 verified partners, including major PMS and channel managers like SiteMinder, RMS, and Cloudbeds. These integrations facilitate smoother operations and data flow, especially for hotels already using these systems.
SHR RMS, with 81 verified partners, boasts a significantly broader integration network, including many PMS, channel managers, and revenue tools like Criton, Profitroom, and OpenHotel. Its extensive partner list offers greater flexibility for hotels with diverse tech stacks.
Edge: SHR Group
LodgIQ has a 5/5 overall rating from 26 reviews, with many praising its user-friendly design and insightful market data. Hotels in segments like luxury, boutique, and city center properties often rate it highly for ease of use and actionable insights.
SHR RMS, with 15 reviews, has a perfect 5/5 rating, especially appreciated by larger hotels and chains for its automation and strategic control features. Hotels seeking comprehensive management tools tend to rate SHR RMS higher.
Considering the recency and quantity of reviews, LodgIQ's higher review count and recent feedback make it the more reliably rated platform.
Edge: LodgIQ
Both LodgIQ and SHR RMS do not publicly disclose their pricing models. Typically, these systems are priced based on hotel size, the number of rooms, and required features, often involving custom quotes. Expect to contact vendors directly for tailored proposals.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
LodgIQ is a highly rated, AI-driven RMS best suited for hotels that value simplicity, detailed market insights, and ease of use. Its intuitive interface and broad feature set make it ideal for independent or smaller hotels seeking to boost revenue without heavy reliance on automation.
SHR RMS, with its extensive automation, strategic tools, and broader integrations, is better suited for larger hotels or chains with complex needs. Its full control over revenue strategies and demand forecasting makes it a top choice for properties seeking a comprehensive revenue management platform.
If your hotel values straightforward operation and recent, high-rated support, LodgIQ should be your pick. For those requiring automation and advanced strategic control, SHR RMS is the more suitable option.
In conclusion, choose LodgIQ if you prioritize user experience, market insights, and flexibility. Opt for SHR RMS if automation, comprehensive features, and detailed forecasting are your top concerns.
According to HTR's product database, LodgIQ and SHR Revenue Management System (RMS) share 34 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 24-Months Pricing & Forecasting | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Bulk Adjustments | ||
| Business Intelligence | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Dynamic Price Hierarchy Control | ||
| Future Market Demand Data | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| Open API | ||
| Open Pricing | ||
| Price Explanation | ||
| Single Sign-On |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Critical mentions focus on occasional technical issues like slow updates, data refresh problems, and system lags. Additionally, some reviews highlight... Critical mentions focus on occasional technical issues like slow updates, data refresh problems, and system lags. Additionally, some reviews highlight slow customer support response times, emphasizing the need for quicker issue resolution to maintain operational efficiency.
Users frequently mention the comprehensive data analysis and reporting features of LodgiQ. The ability to compare historical and current data effectiv... Users frequently mention the comprehensive data analysis and reporting features of LodgiQ. The ability to compare historical and current data effectively, view market metrics, and produce detailed reports supports better strategic planning and operational decisions.
Many reviews highlight LodgiQ's user-friendly interface that makes navigation and data analysis straightforward. Users appreciate the intuitive design... Many reviews highlight LodgiQ's user-friendly interface that makes navigation and data analysis straightforward. Users appreciate the intuitive design and ease of use, which helps streamline their daily tasks and improve efficiency.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. LodgIQ and SHR Revenue Management System (RMS) share many core Revenue Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. LodgIQ offers 25 verified integration partners, while SHR Revenue Management System (RMS) offers 81. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SHR Revenue Management System (RMS) leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
LodgIQ: No. SHR Revenue Management System (RMS): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Revenue Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. LodgIQ has an HT Score of 70 and SHR Group has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor