The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 563 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
M3 shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.1/5) , with exclusive features like Daily Reporting and Financial Reporting.
SafelyStay, Inc. shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 563 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 563 | 0 |
After analyzing 563 verified reviews, M3 users most value its ease of use, payroll and labor management, integration with pms, while SafelyStay, Inc. users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
SafelyStay, Inc. |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Payroll and Labor Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with PMS
▾
|
|
|
+
Financial Reporting and Checking
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
GL Account Search Function
▾
|
|
|
−
Export and Import Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Glitches in Accounting System
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Accounting Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
SafelyStay, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #1 34 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #1 328 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 114 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #2 51 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
SafelyStay, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 203 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #1 138 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #1 393 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #1 66 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
SafelyStay, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #1 522 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #4 6 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #2 3 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #2 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between M3 and SafelyStay hinges on your hotel's core operational needs. M3 is a comprehensive accounting platform tailored for hospitality, while SafelyStay offers specialized guest screening and insurance for vacation rentals. Both address risk management, but only one is backed by a large, recent review base. How do these differences impact your decision?
M3, with over 477 reviews and a 97.3 score, is the clear choice for hoteliers seeking a proven, feature-rich accounting system. SafelyStay, lacking reviews and market presence, cannot currently match M3’s depth or credibility. If your hotel prioritizes financial management, M3 is the better pick.
M3 and SafelyStay serve fundamentally different hotel needs—financial operations versus guest risk management. M3 offers a broad set of accounting features including general ledger, accounts payable, daily reporting, and multicurrency support, and it’s heavily used across North America by hoteliers of all sizes. SafelyStay focuses on guest screening and insurance, primarily for vacation rentals, with no comparable financial features.
The core divergence is in their purpose: M3 manages your hotel’s money flow, while SafelyStay minimizes guest-related risks. Both can be useful if you need both financial and guest screening solutions, but if you're choosing one, your hotel’s operational focus should guide you.
If your hotel needs a proven, feature-rich accounting system that has been refined over decades, go with M3. Its 477 recent reviews and 4.19/5 overall rating demonstrate broad satisfaction, especially in core accounting functions like payroll, general ledger, and financial reporting.
If you operate vacation rentals or short-term properties and want to mitigate guest risks with automated screening and insurance, SafelyStay might seem appealing. However, its lack of reviews and market presence suggests it’s untested at scale, making it a less reliable choice for hotels concerned with financial management.
M3 scores a 4.44/5 for ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward navigation. Its onboarding process averages 4.24/5, indicating most users find it accessible, and customer support ratings of 4.51/5 reflect high satisfaction.
SafelyStay, with no review data or ratings, cannot be confidently compared in usability. Given its niche focus and lack of customer feedback, it’s unlikely to match M3’s user-friendly reputation.
Edge: M3.
M3 offers 23 unique features, including daily reporting, general ledger, accounts payable, multicurrency accounting, document imaging, and tailored financial reports—features critical for hotel financial operations. SafelyStay provides guest screening and insurance solutions, but with no listed features beyond those core to guest verification, it lacks the depth of M3.
M3’s extensive features support complex financial workflows, while SafelyStay’s singular focus limits its capabilities outside risk mitigation. For comprehensive hotel accounting, M3’s feature set outperforms SafelyStay.
Edge: M3.
M3’s 4.51/5 customer support rating, based on user reviews, highlights prompt, helpful service and effective onboarding. Review comments praise the responsiveness and professionalism of M3’s support team, which is vital for busy hotel operations.
SafelyStay has no publicly available reviews or support ratings. Without customer feedback, it’s impossible to assess service quality. Given M3’s established support reputation, it holds the clear advantage.
Edge: M3.
M3 integrates with 39 verified partners, including major PMS, revenue management, and procurement systems like HOTELTIME, Birchstreet, STR, and yieldPlanet. These integrations streamline workflows and data consistency across hotel operations.
SafelyStay has zero verified integrations, limiting its ability to fit into existing hotel tech stacks. M3’s extensive integration network makes it more adaptable and efficient for your team.
Edge: M3.
M3’s recent reviews indicate a 4.19/5 rating from 477 reviewers, predominantly hoteliers managing multiple properties across North America. Hotels emphasize its ease of use, robust features, and excellent support, with comments like “It is no doubt that M3 is more streamlined, more efficient, and positively driving our bottom line.”
SafelyStay has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. The extensive recent feedback on M3 confirms its strong reputation among hotels.
Edge: M3.
M3 is priced at a $400 monthly flat fee with no implementation, trial, or hidden charges. It offers a predictable monthly expense aligned with its comprehensive feature set.
SafelyStay’s pricing is not publicly available, and with no customer reviews, its cost structure remains unclear. Based on transparency and value, M3’s straightforward pricing is preferable.
Hotels that should consider M3 include:
Not ideal if:
SafelyStay is suitable for:
Not ideal if:
M3 is a comprehensive, well-established hotel accounting platform with strong recent reviews, a broad feature set, and extensive integrations. Its proven track record and high user satisfaction make it the go-to solution for most hotels needing financial management.
SafelyStay specializes in guest verification and insurance tailored for vacation rentals but lacks reviews or market presence for hotels. Unless your primary concern is guest risk mitigation within vacation properties, M3 remains the clear choice.
If your hotel needs robust financial tools, choose M3. If your focus is guest screening in short-term rentals and risk management, SafelyStay could be considered, but its lack of data makes it less reliable at this stage.
Hotel Accounting Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
SafelyStay, Inc. | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, M3 (Accounting) and Safely share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
SafelyStay, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Accounts Payable | ||
| Cash Management | ||
| Daily Reporting | ||
| Financial Reporting | ||
| General Ledger | ||
| PMS Mapping |
Showing top differences. 11 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 5 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"With recent global events and the current labor environment, a general manager’s job description has greatly changed, and their time is valuable. With the help of M3, we have been..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We were drawn to the system's tailored design for hospitality, prioritizing user-friendliness and seamless deployment in the field. It's crucial that our General Managers and Direc..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Insight's ability to integrate with third-party data, such as Smith Travel and brand Guest Satisfaction Scores (GSS), is important because owners want to see more than just the rev..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently commend M3 for its user-friendly interface, highlighting how easy it is to operate even after a long period of inactivity with the to... Users frequently commend M3 for its user-friendly interface, highlighting how easy it is to operate even after a long period of inactivity with the tool. This ease of use significantly reduces training time for staff, which is crucial in a fast-paced hotel environment.
M3 stands out for its efficient payroll and labor management capabilities. Users appreciate the platform's ability to handle employee time tracking an... M3 stands out for its efficient payroll and labor management capabilities. Users appreciate the platform's ability to handle employee time tracking and payroll operations smoothly, which helps streamline workforce management in hotels.
The ability to directly import revenue figures from the Property Management System into M3 is greatly valued by users. This integration reduces manual... The ability to directly import revenue figures from the Property Management System into M3 is greatly valued by users. This integration reduces manual data entry, ensuring accuracy and saving time.
Where hoteliers push back
A notable criticism is the lack of a search function within the GL accounts, which users feel would improve efficiency in financial operations. Being... A notable criticism is the lack of a search function within the GL accounts, which users feel would improve efficiency in financial operations. Being able to quickly search for specific accounts would save time in complex financial workflows.
Some users express a desire for better export and import capabilities, such as saving and importing Excel files, to enhance flexibility and integratio... Some users express a desire for better export and import capabilities, such as saving and importing Excel files, to enhance flexibility and integration with external systems.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. M3 (Accounting) and Safely share many core Hotel Accounting Software features, but each has unique capabilities. M3 (Accounting) offers 39 verified integration partners, while Safely offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. M3 (Accounting) leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
M3 (Accounting): No. Safely: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Accounting Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. M3 has an HT Score of 97 and SafelyStay, Inc. has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor