The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 161 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Marriott International shines .
Preno shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 161 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 1 | 160 |
After analyzing 161 verified reviews, Marriott International users most value its , while Preno users highlight user-friendly interface, customer support, channel management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Application
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 80 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #59 1 reviews | #32 15 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #46 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #39 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #68 1 reviews | #14 65 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #12 53 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #60 1 reviews | #21 17 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #8 26 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #43 1 reviews | #27 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #25 13 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #20 3 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #13 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue management. Both FOSSE by Marriott International and Preno aim to serve hoteliers, but they do so with different strengths and target audiences. FOSSE, Marriott’s proprietary solution, is tailored for large hotel chains and properties within the Marriott ecosystem, but it struggles with usability and recent reviews suggest limited adoption. Preno, on the other hand, is a cloud-based, user-friendly PMS favored by small to medium hotels, especially boutique and motels, with a growing number of recent reviews. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
FOSSE is a proprietary system designed exclusively for Marriott properties, providing deep integration with Marriott’s global ecosystem. Preno, however, is a standalone cloud solution used by over 140 hotels across the globe, praised for its ease of use and broad integration capabilities. Recent reviews indicate FOSSE’s low overall rating (2/5, with only one review) and a lack of recent feedback, raising doubts about its current effectiveness. Preno, with a high rating of 4.73/5 based on 144 reviews, and recent positive feedback, is clearly more trusted and better supported today.
Both systems address core PMS functions—booking, check-in/out, billing—but they diverge significantly in user experience and flexibility. FOSSE's menu-heavy interface and lack of a GUI frustrate users, who find it outdated and hard to navigate. Preno’s intuitive interface, mobile support, and automation features make daily operations simpler. Are you willing to prioritize ease of use over deep, proprietary integrations?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, cloud-based PMS that minimizes administrative time, Preno is the clear choice. It suits boutique hotels, motels, and properties that value a simple setup, mobile access, and integration with tools like Xero and SiteMinder. Conversely, if your hotel is part of the Marriott chain—or heavily reliant on Marriott’s internal systems—FOSSE might seem appealing. However, given its poor recent reviews, limited support, and complex user interface, Preno offers a more reliable and scalable solution for most hotels outside the Marriott ecosystem.
For hoteliers seeking a flexible, modern PMS with strong third-party integrations and support, Preno outperforms FOSSE. If your team prioritizes user-friendly features, quick onboarding, and recent positive feedback, Preno is the better fit. When in doubt, consider whether your hotel needs the deep, proprietary Marriott system or a versatile, cloud-native platform like Preno.
Preno’s user interface scores 4.78/5, with many reviews praising its simplicity and ease of navigation—users describe it as "brilliant" and "thoughtfully laid out." Support for staff onboarding is rated 4.68/5, and many mention that Preno’s platform minimizes training time and reduces errors.
FOSSE, rated only 2/5 for ease of use, suffers from a menu-heavy layout with no GUI, leading to frustration among users who describe it as "retro" and "keyboard intensive." Its complex navigation and lack of hotkeys make daily tasks more cumbersome. Edge: Preno.
Preno boasts over 30 unique features including integrated channel management, booking engine, guest CRM, automated night audits, revenue management, and a native mobile app. These features are designed to streamline operations and improve revenue, with many praised for their automation and real-time functionality.
FOSSE, by comparison, offers core PMS functions but lacks the wide array of additional features that differentiate Preno. Its feature set is limited, and recent reviews highlight its menu-heavy interface and outdated design, which hinder productivity. Edge: Preno.
Preno’s support team scores 4.8/5, with many reviews citing quick, helpful responses and ongoing support that makes onboarding and daily use easier. Users appreciate the responsiveness, with some describing Preno’s support as "brilliant," especially during transitions.
FOSSE’s support scores 3/5, and the single review mentions delays and difficulties with system sync and usability. Support for FOSSE appears limited, and its low rating signals ongoing issues. Edge: Preno.
Preno offers 17 verified integrations, including popular tools like Xero, SiteMinder, RevControl, and TrustYou. Its open architecture allows easy connectivity with additional third-party systems, making it adaptable for various hotel operations.
FOSSE, with only 2 verified partners—Actabl and Marriott International—limits integration options. Its proprietary nature restricts flexibility, which could hinder your hotel’s ability to connect with other tools. Edge: Preno.
Preno’s recent reviews and high ratings reflect satisfaction across hotel segments, especially boutique hotels and motels, with a 4.72/5 average based on 138 reviews. Hotels in diverse markets value its simplicity, support, and features.
FOSSE, with just one review and a low overall rating of 2/5, is not rated favorably, especially outside Marriott properties. Its outdated interface and support issues diminish its appeal. Edge: Preno.
FOSSE’s pricing details are unavailable, as it’s a proprietary Marriott system often included within broader corporate agreements. Preno charges $800 upfront with no recurring fees, offering transparency and flexibility for small to medium hotels.
If budget transparency is critical, Preno’s straightforward pricing makes it easier to evaluate ROI. FOSSE’s hidden or complex pricing structures are less appealing for independent hoteliers. Edge: Preno.
FOSSE may suit large, corporate-owned hotels that need tight integration but might be overkill for small or independent properties.
Preno fits hotels that want to streamline daily tasks without sacrificing support or features.
FOSSE, as Marriott’s proprietary system, is designed for large, integrated hotel groups within the Marriott ecosystem. Its outdated interface, limited recent reviews, and support issues make it a less attractive option for most hotels today.
Preno, with its high user ratings, broad feature set, and recent positive reviews, offers a flexible, accessible solution for small to medium hotels. Its ease of use, integrations, and support make it a strong choice for hoteliers aiming to improve operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
If your hotel is part of Marriott, FOSSE might be necessary, but for most other properties, Preno’s modern approach and proven track record make it the smarter investment. Ultimately, Preno’s recent reviews and high recommendation scores position it as the more reliable, scalable choice for your hotel.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, FOSSE and Preno share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 18 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during wee... The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during weekends or busy periods. Responsiveness and direct contact with support staff are valued highly.
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
Where hoteliers push back
Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better str... Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better strategic decision-making. Some users expressed a need for customized reporting features.
Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with... Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with offline functionality and more feature depth would improve usability, especially for managers on the go.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. FOSSE and Preno share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. FOSSE offers 2 verified integration partners, while Preno offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Preno leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 2.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
FOSSE: No. Preno: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Marriott International has an HT Score of 0 and Preno has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor