The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 44 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Marriott International shines .
Redforts shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Side-by-side ratings based on 44 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 1 | 43 |
After analyzing 44 verified reviews, Marriott International users most value its , while Redforts users highlight ease of use and intuitive system, reservation management, customer service. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive system
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer service
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous improvement and innovation
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Interface and design improvements
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #31 21 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #59 1 reviews | #49 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #68 1 reviews | #30 18 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #39 5 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | #60 1 reviews | #49 2 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #37 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #43 1 reviews | #32 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #14 39 reviews |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) involves balancing features, usability, support, and value. Marriott’s FOSSE, as a proprietary system, aims to streamline hotel operations with deep integration within Marriott’s ecosystem, but it has limited reviews and usability concerns. Conversely, Redforts offers a broad feature set, high user satisfaction, and a proven track record with more recent reviews. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize brand-specific integrations or a flexible, user-friendly platform with extensive features.
Both products promise to improve operational efficiency, but their approaches differ. FOSSE focuses on internal Marriott hotel chains with tailored connectivity, while Redforts targets a wider array of property types with an emphasis on ease of use and automation. Do you need a system tightly aligned with Marriott’s standards, or a versatile solution adaptable across various property types?
FOSSE, Marriott’s proprietary PMS, primarily serves Marriott-branded hotels and motels, offering integration with Marriott’s internal systems. It’s designed to streamline operations within Marriott’s ecosystem but is limited in third-party integrations and flexibility. Its overall low rating of 2/5 and a single review reflect significant usability and support challenges, with users citing difficulty navigating the menu-heavy interface and manual synchronization issues.
Redforts, on the other hand, boasts a 72.88 HTR Score and a 4.68/5 ease of use rating based on 40 recent reviews. Users praise its intuitive design, automation, and comprehensive feature set that covers bookings, channel management, revenue, and guest communication. Its modularity and broad compatibility make it suitable for various property types. Would you prefer a system optimized solely for Marriott hotels, or a more adaptable option for diverse property portfolios?
Edge: Redforts.
If your hotel is part of the Marriott chain, especially within a large franchise or corporate network, FOSSE might seem appealing for its integrated functions. However, with only one review and a 2/5 rating, it currently does not offer a user-friendly experience or robust support, making it a less reliable choice. Its limited review data and negative feedback suggest it’s not suited for hotels seeking operational agility.
Redforts is ideal if you need a versatile, easy-to-learn system that automates daily tasks and integrates well with third-party platforms. Its 40 reviews and high recent NPS score of 9.5/10 demonstrate strong user satisfaction across property types, especially for boutique hotels, hostels, and small resorts. For properties that prioritize ease and automation over brand-specific features, Redforts stands out.
Edge: Redforts.
FOSSE’s interface is described as menu heavy and lacking a GUI, reminiscent of retro systems, with a 2/5 ease-of-use rating and just one review. Users report difficulty performing simple tasks, requiring extensive key strokes, which hampers staff adoption and increases training time. Its onboarding process scores 2/5, indicating room for improvement.
Redforts, with a 4.68/5 ease-of-use score from 40 reviews, is praised for its intuitive layout, quick onboarding, and user-friendly design. Users frequently mention that staff members find it straightforward, which reduces errors and speeds up daily operations. The contrast is stark: for ease and staff adoption, Edge: Redforts.
FOSSE’s feature set appears limited; it mainly handles core reservations, check-ins, and billing, with no publicly available list of advanced features. Its design is menu-driven and lacks modern functionalities like automation, guest communication, or revenue management.
Redforts offers 46 exclusive features, including multi-currency, guest CRM, online check-in, automated reminders, digital registration, channel management, revenue and rate management, POS integration, and real-time reporting. Its extensive suite allows operations to be streamlined from reservations to guest engagement. For feature richness, Edge: Redforts.
FOSSE’s support rating is 3/5 based on one review, with users citing delays and a lack of proactive assistance. The review indicates that support may not meet modern expectations for quick, personalized service, and the onboarding process is described as subpar.
Redforts, with a 4.53/5 score from 40 reviews, is consistently praised for its customer support. Users describe the team as friendly, efficient, and quick to respond, with one reviewer noting, “Jan and the team keep innovating and improving Redforts." For better support, Edge: Redforts.
FOSSE integrates with only two verified partners—Actabl and Marriott International—limiting its connectivity options. Its ecosystem is tightly controlled, restricting integration flexibility, which might hinder larger or more diverse property portfolios.
Redforts also offers two verified integrations—Mr. Winston and WuBook (channel manager)—but its broader feature set and compatibility make it more adaptable. Its open architecture supports additional peripherals like POS systems and self-check-in kiosks. For more flexible integrations, Edge: Redforts.
FOSSE has only one review, rating it poorly at 2/5, which significantly limits insight into user satisfaction. The review highlights operational challenges and dissatisfaction with complexity and support.
Redforts has 40 reviews with a 4.68/5 score, and a 95% likelihood to recommend, indicating high satisfaction levels. Users, including boutique hotels and hostels, praise its ease and automation, making it the clear favorite among hoteliers seeking reliable, modern solutions.
Edge: Redforts.
FOSSE’s pricing is not publicly disclosed; as a proprietary Marriott system, it likely involves internal budgeting and negotiations.
Redforts charges a base price of $500, with no ongoing subscription fees or implementation costs publicly available. This transparent pricing makes it accessible for small and medium properties seeking a cost-effective, all-in-one solution.
FOSSE is a proprietary, brand-specific system designed for Marriott hotels but currently suffers from usability and support issues. Its limited reviews and negative feedback suggest it’s not suitable for hotels outside the Marriott ecosystem or those seeking operational agility.
Redforts excels in flexibility, user-friendliness, and feature breadth, backed by a strong review base and recent high satisfaction scores. Its automation and integration capabilities make it ideal for a diverse range of property types looking to improve efficiency and guest experience.
If your hotel is part of the Marriott chain and your priority is deep integration within Marriott’s systems, FOSSE might be worth considering—yet, the current user feedback indicates significant room for improvement.
However, if you need a proven, widely adopted PMS with extensive features, ease of use, and strong support, Redforts is the clear choice. It offers a modern, scalable solution capable of serving various property types effectively, with consistently high ratings and recent reviews confirming its value.
In summary: for most hotels beyond Marriott, Redforts provides a more reliable, feature-rich, and user-friendly experience. Its high recent review count and satisfaction scores make it the better option for hotels aiming to streamline operations and enhance guest engagement today.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, FOSSE and Redforts share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
Ranks higher for
What hoteliers love
Many users appreciate Redforts for its intuitive design, which simplifies training and reduces human errors. This streamlines daily operations, freein... Many users appreciate Redforts for its intuitive design, which simplifies training and reduces human errors. This streamlines daily operations, freeing up staff for other tasks.
The system excels at managing reservations, preventing overbooking, and integrating with multiple platforms. Customization for booking engines and cha... The system excels at managing reservations, preventing overbooking, and integrating with multiple platforms. Customization for booking engines and channel management is also highlighted as a significant strength.
The attentive and responsive customer service is frequently applauded. Users mention personal communication and quick resolution of issues, contributi... The attentive and responsive customer service is frequently applauded. Users mention personal communication and quick resolution of issues, contributing to an overall positive experience.
Where hoteliers push back
Redforts integrates efficiently with booking engines, channel managers, and other platforms, providing a seamless management experience. This capabili... Redforts integrates efficiently with booking engines, channel managers, and other platforms, providing a seamless management experience. This capability simplifies coordination between different systems and platforms.
While the functionality is praised, several reviews mention that the interface appears outdated and could benefit from modernization to enhance visual... While the functionality is praised, several reviews mention that the interface appears outdated and could benefit from modernization to enhance visual appeal and efficiency.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. FOSSE and Redforts share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. FOSSE offers 2 verified integration partners, while Redforts offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Redforts leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 2.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
FOSSE: No. Redforts: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Marriott International has an HT Score of 0 and Redforts has 73. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor