The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 95 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Pre-stay emails.
Mastercamping shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 95 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 95 | 0 |
After analyzing 95 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its ease of use, revenue enhancement, customer service, while Mastercamping users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Mastercamping |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Enhancement
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
|
|
+
Advanced Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Complexity and Usability Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Lag in Feature Implementation
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Mastercamping |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #22 11 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #15 36 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 26 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #9 6 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Mastercamping |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #17 32 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #12 41 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #10 34 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #14 11 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Mastercamping |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #7 39 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #19 14 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #16 10 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 8 reviews | — |
Choosing a booking engine for your hotel involves assessing functionality, ease of use, support, and integration capabilities. Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine offers a well-established platform backed by extensive reviews, while Mastercamping (MasterASP) presents a less proven but potentially suitable solution for niche markets. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, technical needs, and growth ambitions. Do you want a mature, feature-rich platform or a simple, specialized system?
Both products aim to increase direct bookings and streamline reservations, but they diverge significantly in maturity and market presence. Amadeus, with over 93 recent reviews and a high overall rating of 4.39/5, provides a feature-rich and widely adopted solution, particularly suited for hotels seeking advanced tools and proven reliability. Mastercamping, lacking recent reviews and a rating, appears less established, which raises concerns about support, features, and integration.
Amadeus’s extensive feature set—36 unique features—enables sophisticated rate management, email automation, multi-currency support, and integration with marketing channels. In contrast, Mastercamping offers no documented features or integrations, suggesting a basic or less developed platform. If your hotel prioritizes a proven, comprehensive booking engine, Amadeus is clearly the safer choice. Are you ready to commit to a platform with a long track record and broad capabilities?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, flexible booking engine with extensive integrations, choose Amadeus. Its broad regional presence and positive reviews from a variety of hotel segments—independent, boutique, and resorts—make it suitable for properties aiming to enhance direct bookings with advanced marketing and analytics tools.
If your hotel operates on a small scale or in a niche market like campsites or holiday parks, and you prefer an all-in-one property management solution, Mastercamping might appeal. However, the lack of recent reviews and a clear feature set makes Amadeus the safer bet for most hoteliers seeking reliable, scalable technology.
Amadeus scores 4.25/5 in ease of use, with reviews praising its user-friendly interface once mastered and high onboarding ratings of 4.01/5. Users highlight that, although initially complex, daily use becomes intuitive with proper training and support. Customers often mention the responsiveness of their dedicated account managers, though some complaints note a lag in support responsiveness.
Mastercamping, with no recent reviews or user ratings, offers no clear insight into usability or onboarding. Its minimal online presence suggests a potentially limited user community and support infrastructure. Based on available data, Amadeus edges out as the easier-to-use platform, especially for hotels that prioritize reliable onboarding and ongoing support.
Amadeus’s booking engine boasts 36 features, including mobile responsiveness, pre- and post-stay emails, automated reporting, multi-currency and multi-lingual support, loyalty program integration, and advanced rate management tools like discounts, flash sales, and booking abandonment recapture. These features empower your team to personalize offers, optimize conversions, and analyze performance effectively.
Mastercamping, with no documented features, offers no clear competitive advantages in functionality. Its lack of feature transparency and absence of integrations suggest a minimal or less developed solution. If feature richness and customization are priorities, Amadeus’s extensive capabilities give it a decisive edge.
Amadeus’s support scores 3.22/5, with reviews indicating mixed experiences—some praise the responsiveness and dedicated account managers, while others report slow responses and support delays. Review quotes highlight the importance of ongoing training and better support responsiveness for effective system use.
Mastercamping has no available review data on customer support, leaving its support quality uncertain. Given the critical role support plays in platform success and the extensive reviews backing Amadeus, it’s clear that Amadeus currently offers more reliable support. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus integrates with 104 verified partners, including prominent systems like Priority Software, Orange Hotel Marketing, RevControl, and Google Hotel Ads. These integrations facilitate seamless operations across various hotel management and marketing tools, reducing manual work and errors.
Mastercamping has no listed integrations or verified partners, raising questions about its ability to connect with other systems. Without integrations, your hotel may face operational silos and increased manual effort. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s reviews indicate an overall rating of 4.39/5, with 87% likely to recommend and a strong presence across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. Hoteliers particularly appreciate its advanced features, market intelligence, and positive revenue impact, especially in independent, boutique, and resort segments.
Mastercamping has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or property-specific feedback. As the more established platform with a proven track record, Amadeus clearly garners higher user ratings. Edge: Amadeus.
Pricing details for Amadeus are not publicly disclosed, but it typically involves a customized quote based on hotel size and feature needs, with no implementation fee or freemium options. The platform’s value lies in its extensive capabilities, often justified by higher investment but also delivering measurable revenue improvements.
Mastercamping’s pricing is similarly undisclosed, with no trial or clearly defined costs available publicly. Given the lack of transparency and limited market presence, the overall cost-to-value ratio remains uncertain for Mastercamping.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Amadeus’s iHotelier® is a comprehensive, globally recognized booking engine with a broad feature set, extensive integrations, and a sizable user base. Its strengths include advanced tools for revenue management, marketing, and analytics, making it ideal for larger or growth-oriented hotels.
Mastercamping offers a basic, less documented solution suitable for small or niche properties, particularly those in outdoor or leisure markets. Its limited information and lack of recent reviews suggest it may not support complex needs or scalable growth.
If your hotel values reliability, advanced features, and proven market presence, Amadeus is the superior choice. For properties with minimal technical needs and a focus on operational automation, Mastercamping could suffice, but careful consideration is advised due to its opaque support and feature profile.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Mastercamping |
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and Mastercamping (MasterASP) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Mastercamping |
|---|---|---|
| Automated reporting | ||
| Flat, floating and discounted rates | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Post-stay emails | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Urgency messaging |
Showing top differences. 24 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth... TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth handling of reservations and rate management. This user-friendliness is a key selling point.
Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with va... Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with various channels. Mentioned are features like multi-rate display, flash sales, and the new Web 4.0 platform, which have significantly boosted direct bookings and overall revenue.
Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow re... Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow response times and difficulty in resolving issues. This inconsistency is an important consideration for potential buyers.
Where hoteliers push back
TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless conn... TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless connectivity that supports diverse functionalities and simplifies management through unified interfaces.
Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This c... Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This complexity can hinder optimal use of the system, especially for less experienced users.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and Mastercamping (MasterASP) share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine offers 104 verified integration partners, while Mastercamping (MasterASP) offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine: No. Mastercamping (MasterASP): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 72 and Mastercamping has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor