The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 107 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Zingle shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Guest History and SMS text messaging.
Opally shines , with exclusive features like Automated Workflows and Website Livechat.
Side-by-side ratings based on 107 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 107 | 0 |
After analyzing 107 verified reviews, Zingle users most value its communication, ease of use, auto messages, while Opally users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of use
▾
|
|
|
+
Auto messages
▾
|
|
|
+
Response time
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Technical glitches
▾
|
|
|
−
Platform integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Guest Messaging Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #12 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #11 25 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #3 42 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #4 25 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #10 44 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #8 47 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #8 48 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #11 7 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #5 103 reviews | — |
| Europe | #18 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between Medallia Zingle and Opally for your hotel’s guest messaging needs hinges on your priorities: proven market presence versus innovative AI features. Zingle, with its extensive review base and established reputation, offers a seasoned solution for contactless communication and operational efficiency. Opally, despite being newer and less reviewed, emphasizes automation and AI-driven guest interactions, promising a high-tech edge. Your decision should reflect your hotel’s scale, tech strategy, and specific communication needs.
Medallia Zingle boasts over 107 recent reviews, a high overall rating of 4.68/5, and a strong presence across multiple regions. Its reviews highlight notable ease of use, excellent customer support, and a well-established integration ecosystem, especially with systems like Opera and HotSOS. Conversely, Opally, with zero reviews and a fledgling market presence, offers a platform rooted in AI automation and omnichannel management, but without proven user feedback to validate its effectiveness. Do you prioritize a proven track record or innovative AI capabilities?
If your hotel values a mature, highly-rated platform with extensive integrations, go with Zingle. It is especially suitable if you seek reliable support, a broad feature set, and a history of boosting guest satisfaction. If you're a tech-forward property eager to harness AI to automate conversations, handle reservations, and personalize guest interactions at scale, Opally might appeal — but only if you’re comfortable with its untested market presence. For most hotels, Zingle’s review backing makes it the safer choice.
Zingle’s ease of use is reflected in its 4.73/5 UI rating and positive reviews praising its straightforward interface and quick onboarding. Staff find it simple to manage guest conversations from one screen, reducing learning curves. Opally’s interface and usability are not rated or reviewed, so its ease of adoption remains unverified. Given the extensive positive feedback, Edge: Zingle.
Zingle offers 13 features exclusive to its platform, including Guest History, Photo Sharing, Secured Data Protection, SMS Text Messaging, Facebook Messenger Integration, and Messaging Guest Surveys. Opally counters with 11 unique features, like Automated Workflows, Self-Learning NLP, and Sentiment Analysis, focusing on AI automation and personalization. While both provide omnichannel messaging, Zingle’s broader integration options and proven analytics give it an edge for hotels prioritizing reliable, feature-rich communication.
Zingle’s support ratings are high at 4.58/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful customer service and smooth onboarding. Users praise their dedicated success teams and responsive support staff, which is vital for troubleshooting and implementation. Opally, with no reviews, offers no verified support data. For a hotel that values proven support and rapid issue resolution, Edge: Zingle.
Zingle integrates with 16 verified partners, including Opera, HotSOS, SiteMinder, and Oracle Hospitality, allowing seamless connection with your existing systems. Opally currently has no verified integrations or partner ecosystem. If your hotel relies on existing property management or revenue systems, Zingle’s extensive integrations are a clear advantage. Edge: Zingle.
Zingle’s 107 recent reviews consistently rate it highly across hotel segments, with an overall score of 4.68/5, and independent and branded hotels rating it 4.75/5 and 4.69/5 respectively. These ratings reflect strong user satisfaction and recent positive experiences. Opally, lacking reviews entirely, cannot be evaluated on user feedback. For proven hotel satisfaction, Zingle wins. Edge: Zingle.
Zingle’s pricing details are not publicly available, but it does not offer a freemium or trial, suggesting a tailored, possibly premium cost structure. Opally charges a fixed $500 monthly fee, with no mention of tiered plans or trial options. Without detailed pricing, Zingle’s value proposition is based on proven ROI and support, while Opally’s flat fee offers budget predictability. Your decision depends on your willingness to invest in a mature platform versus experimenting with a newer solution.
Not ideal if you’re a small property with minimal tech infrastructure or budget constraints.
Not ideal if you prefer a proven, extensively supported platform or lack in-house AI expertise.
In essence, Zingle is a seasoned guest messaging platform with a proven track record, extensive reviews, and broad integrations. Its main strength lies in its reliability, support, and ability to improve guest satisfaction through contactless, multi-channel communication. Opally offers innovative AI features and automation capabilities but lacks user reviews and proven market presence, making it a riskier choice for most hotels.
If your hotel values stability, proven performance, and extensive support, Zingle is the clear choice. It’s well-suited for hotels of all sizes looking to enhance guest communication without uncertainty. Conversely, if your property is ready to pioneer AI-driven guest interactions and you’re comfortable with less market validation, Opally could be worth exploring — but only with careful consideration of its untested reputation.
According to HTR's product database, Medallia Zingle and Opally share 8 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Workflows | ||
| Click to Call | ||
| Facebook Messenger Integration | ||
| Guest History | ||
| Interface Personalization | ||
| Lead Qualification | ||
| Open API | ||
| Photo Sharing | ||
| SMS text messaging | ||
| Secured Data Protection | ||
| Smooth Handover to Human Agents | ||
| Website Livechat |
Showing top differences. 12 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users find Zingle excels in facilitating easy and quick communication with guests, allowing issues to be resolved before escalating. This adaptability... Users find Zingle excels in facilitating easy and quick communication with guests, allowing issues to be resolved before escalating. This adaptability has led to elevated guest satisfaction and lessened workload on staff. The ability to handle multiple guest inquiries simultaneously and send mass messages is viewed as a significant strength.
Zingle's user-friendly interface is frequently praised, making it easy for hotel staff to learn and efficiently handle guest messages. This ease of us... Zingle's user-friendly interface is frequently praised, making it easy for hotel staff to learn and efficiently handle guest messages. This ease of use extends to both the web platform and mobile application.
Auto messaging is appreciated for handling routine communications and improving response times. However, there were critiques about auto responses not... Auto messaging is appreciated for handling routine communications and improving response times. However, there were critiques about auto responses not always reflecting the current status accurately, which could lead to guest confusion.
Where hoteliers push back
Users generally appreciate Zingle's customization options for both messages and the platform itself. However, some new users found it challenging to c... Users generally appreciate Zingle's customization options for both messages and the platform itself. However, some new users found it challenging to customize certain features to fit their specific needs, suggesting room for improvement in flexibility.
Although most users are satisfied with Zingle, some have pointed out technical issues such as system crashes, message delays, and synchronization prob... Although most users are satisfied with Zingle, some have pointed out technical issues such as system crashes, message delays, and synchronization problems with PMS, affecting overall efficiency and user experience.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Medallia Zingle and Opally share many core Guest Messaging Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Medallia Zingle offers 16 verified integration partners, while Opally offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Medallia Zingle leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Medallia Zingle: No. Opally: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Guest Messaging Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Zingle has an HT Score of 19 and Opally has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor