The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 107 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Zingle shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile Friendly and Guest History.
Quiq shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 107 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 107 | 0 |
After analyzing 107 verified reviews, Zingle users most value its communication, ease of use, auto messages, while Quiq users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of use
▾
|
|
|
+
Auto messages
▾
|
|
|
+
Response time
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Technical glitches
▾
|
|
|
−
Platform integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Guest Messaging Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #12 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #11 25 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #3 42 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #4 25 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #10 44 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #8 47 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #8 48 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #11 7 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #5 103 reviews | — |
| Europe | #18 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between Medallia Zingle by Zingle and Quiq for your hotel’s guest communication needs hinges on your specific priorities. Both aim to streamline guest messaging, but Zingle dominates in hotel-focused features, integrations, and industry reputation. Quiq focuses on broader customer service channels and may suit non-hospitality businesses better. Which platform aligns with your hotel’s size, guest engagement goals, and existing systems?
Both Zingle and Quiq facilitate real-time messaging, but Zingle is built explicitly for hospitality, offering 21 industry-specific features compared to no unique features in Quiq. Zingle’s extensive integrations with PMS and channel partners make it better suited for hotels aiming for contactless check-in or personalized guest interactions. Quiq’s messaging channels (SMS, Facebook Messenger, Live Chat, Kik) are more general, serving various sectors. Do you prioritize hotel-specific tools and integrations?
If your hotel needs a dedicated guest messaging system with hotel-centric features, go with Zingle. It has over 107 reviews, a 4.68/5 overall rating, and a recent surge in positive feedback for ease of use and support. If your team prioritizes multi-channel customer service across industries without specific hotel features, Quiq might seem attractive, but its lack of hotel-focused integrations and reviews makes it less proven for hospitality. Which features are non-negotiable for your property?
Zingle’s intuitive interface scores 4.73/5 for ease of use, with many reviews highlighting its user-friendly design and quick onboarding. Users praise its ability to manage conversations on a single screen, making staff adoption straightforward. Quiq offers a similar messaging experience but has no publicly available ratings or recent reviews to assess ease of use. Based on available data, Zingle clearly leads here. Edge: Zingle.
Zingle outperforms with 21 hotel-specific features such as mobile friendliness, guest history, photo sharing, secured data, SMS messaging, Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, analytics dashboards, automated replies, chatbots, and more. Quiq offers no unique features tailored to hospitality and lacks documented functionalities beyond basic messaging. For a hotel seeking extensive guest engagement tools, Zingle’s feature set is unmatched. Edge: Zingle.
Zingle’s reviews emphasize its excellent support and onboarding, rating 4.58/5, with hoteliers describing their support team as “legendary” and “responsive.” Several reviews mention quick response times and dedicated customer success managers. Quiq has no recent reviews or ratings publicly available, so it’s impossible to compare support quality. Based on current data, Zingle’s support is clearly superior. Edge: Zingle.
Zingle boasts 16 verified partners, including property management systems like Opera, HotSOS, and channel managers like SiteMinder, Quore, and Oracle Hospitality. Quiq has no verified integrations listed, limiting its ability to connect with hotel systems. If seamless property management integration is critical, Zingle’s ecosystem makes it a more versatile choice. Edge: Zingle.
Zingle enjoys a 4.68/5 overall rating from 107 reviews, with recent feedback praising its user-friendly interface and effective communication capabilities. Hotel segments like independent, branded, and resort properties rate it highly, with an overall likelihood to recommend at 95%. Quiq has no reviews or ratings in the hotel industry, making it impossible to gauge hoteliers’ satisfaction. Clearly, Zingle is the preferred choice among hotel operators. Edge: Zingle.
Both platforms do not publicly disclose their pricing models, but Zingle is known for its custom pricing based on property size and needs, typically involving a monthly fee per room or user. Quiq also offers customized pricing without a trial or freemium model. Given the lack of transparent prices, your hotel should request quotes directly. Which budget considerations are most important for your decision?
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Zingle is a messaging platform explicitly designed for the hospitality industry, offering hotel-centric features, integrations, and a proven track record backed by over 107 recent reviews. It’s tailored for hotels aiming to deliver contactless experiences, automate guest interactions, and improve operational efficiency.
Choose Zingle if your hotel wants a robust, hotel-focused system with extensive integrations and support, especially if you value recent positive feedback. Its high satisfaction ratings and industry-specific tools make it the safer, more proven choice.
Quiq may appear versatile and CRM-agnostic, but its lack of hotel-specific features, reviews, and integrations makes it less suited for most hotel environments. It might serve other industries better but falls short in delivering hospitality-specific solutions.
In conclusion, if your hotel seeks a dedicated guest messaging platform with proven success, Zingle stands out as the clear leader. For broader customer service needs outside hospitality, explore Quiq, but for hotels, Zingle’s specialization and recent review momentum make it the recommended choice.
According to HTR's product database, Medallia Zingle and Quiq share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Guest History | ||
| Mobile Friendly | ||
| Open API | ||
| Photo Sharing | ||
| SMS text messaging | ||
| Secured Data Protection |
Showing top differences. 9 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users find Zingle excels in facilitating easy and quick communication with guests, allowing issues to be resolved before escalating. This adaptability... Users find Zingle excels in facilitating easy and quick communication with guests, allowing issues to be resolved before escalating. This adaptability has led to elevated guest satisfaction and lessened workload on staff. The ability to handle multiple guest inquiries simultaneously and send mass messages is viewed as a significant strength.
Zingle's user-friendly interface is frequently praised, making it easy for hotel staff to learn and efficiently handle guest messages. This ease of us... Zingle's user-friendly interface is frequently praised, making it easy for hotel staff to learn and efficiently handle guest messages. This ease of use extends to both the web platform and mobile application.
Auto messaging is appreciated for handling routine communications and improving response times. However, there were critiques about auto responses not... Auto messaging is appreciated for handling routine communications and improving response times. However, there were critiques about auto responses not always reflecting the current status accurately, which could lead to guest confusion.
Where hoteliers push back
Users generally appreciate Zingle's customization options for both messages and the platform itself. However, some new users found it challenging to c... Users generally appreciate Zingle's customization options for both messages and the platform itself. However, some new users found it challenging to customize certain features to fit their specific needs, suggesting room for improvement in flexibility.
Although most users are satisfied with Zingle, some have pointed out technical issues such as system crashes, message delays, and synchronization prob... Although most users are satisfied with Zingle, some have pointed out technical issues such as system crashes, message delays, and synchronization problems with PMS, affecting overall efficiency and user experience.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Medallia Zingle and Quiq share many core Guest Messaging Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Medallia Zingle offers 16 verified integration partners, while Quiq offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Medallia Zingle leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Medallia Zingle: No. Quiq: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Guest Messaging Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Zingle has an HT Score of 19 and Quiq has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor