The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 887 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Mews shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Smart Finder shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 887 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 887 | 0 |
After analyzing 887 verified reviews, Mews users most value its ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, while Smart Finder users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #3 329 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #1 397 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #3 45 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #3 49 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #5 220 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 170 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #1 130 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #8 106 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #10 17 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #28 8 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both Mews PMS and Soraso aim to streamline hospitality management, but they differ markedly in review volume, recent user feedback, and feature breadth. Mews, with over 750 reviews and a recent surge in user satisfaction, stands as the more proven option. How do these two solutions stack up in key areas essential to your hotel’s success?
Mews is a cloud-based platform designed to automate reservations, billing, and guest communications while offering extensive integrations through its marketplace. Soraso, by contrast, appears less established, with no available review data, and lacks transparent recent user feedback. While Mews’s large and recent review base suggests ongoing support and innovation, Soraso’s limited information leaves its reliability and feature set less certain. Are you comfortable choosing a solution with proven performance at scale, or do you prefer emerging technology without clear validation?
If your hotel needs a mature, highly-rated PMS with a broad feature set, go with Mews. Its extensive integrations, automation tools, and proven track record for improving operational efficiency make it ideal for mid-sized to large hotels, boutique properties, and chains seeking scalability. Conversely, if your hotel is smaller, with simple requirements and a preference for a lesser-known provider, Soraso might appeal — but with no review data or recent feedback, the risk remains high. Would you prefer a system backed by thousands of reviews and ongoing development, or venture into unproven territory?
Mews scores an impressive 4.7 out of 5 for ease of use, supported by a modern, intuitive interface and a straightforward onboarding process reflected in reviews. Users frequently mention that Mews is “very user-friendly” and “makes everything much easier,” with support teams praised for their responsiveness. Soraso’s ease of use remains unverified due to the absence of reviews or user feedback, making it difficult to assess whether it can match Mews’s high usability standards. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a robust suite of 59 unique features, including multi-language and multi-currency support, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, integrated POS, and automated night audit. Soraso’s feature set remains unspecified, with no available data indicating comparable capabilities. Given the extensive feature count and proven integrations in Mews, it’s clear that it provides more tools to optimize operations and guest engagement. Edge: Mews.
Mews maintains a 4.27 out of 5 support rating, with most reviews highlighting responsive, helpful customer service and effective onboarding. Hoteliers often say, “their support team sets new standards,” and recent reviews indicate ongoing satisfaction. Without any reviews or support data for Soraso, assessing its support quality is impossible. Given Mews’s proven support track record, it is the safer choice for hotels prioritizing reliable assistance. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts over 336 verified integrations, including key partners like IDeaS, Criton, and Orange Hotel Marketing, enabling flexible customization. Soraso’s reported partnership count is only 2, with one shared partner (IDeaS), and limited information on its integration ecosystem. For hotels that rely on diverse third-party tools, Mews’s extensive integrations provide a clear advantage. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s 4.62/5 overall rating, based on 758 reviews, demonstrates strong and recent user satisfaction, especially among boutique, hostel, and city center hotels. Reviewers applaud its user-friendliness, automation, and support. Soraso has no publicly available reviews or ratings, leaving its hotel user perception uncertain. Given the transparent recent feedback, Mews clearly holds higher reputation among hoteliers. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 monthly, with no implementation or trial fees, offering transparency for hotels seeking predictable costs. Soraso’s pricing details are unavailable, which complicates budgeting and comparison. Without concrete numbers for Soraso, Mews’s clear pricing structure provides a more informed basis for decision-making. Edge: Mews.
Mews stands out with its extensive, proven feature set, high user ratings, and a large base of recent reviews, reflecting ongoing development and support. It’s especially suited for hotels looking for a scalable, flexible PMS that integrates with a wide array of tools and enhances operational efficiency.
If your hotel values reliability, proven performance, and a rich ecosystem, Mews is the clear choice, offering tools that support growth and guest satisfaction. Its comprehensive support and extensive integrations make it ideal for hotels aiming to optimize every aspect of their operations.
On the other hand, Soraso remains an unverified option with no available recent reviews or detailed features, making it a risky choice for hotels seeking stability and proven results. If your hotel is small, with basic needs, and willing to take a chance on a lesser-known provider, Soraso might be considered, but the lack of data warrants caution.
In conclusion, for hotels prioritizing confidence, scalability, and a proven track record, Mews is the best fit. Its extensive review base and recent user feedback confirm its position as a leading PMS in the hospitality industry.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Mews PMS and Soraso share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 47 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Where hoteliers push back
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting featu... While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting features. Users express the desire for more granular data insights, particularly in reservations and revenue analysis.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Mews PMS and Soraso share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Mews PMS offers 335 verified integration partners, while Soraso offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Mews PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Mews PMS: No. Soraso: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Mews has an HT Score of 100 and Smart Finder has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor