The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 160 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Opera shines .
Preno shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 160 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 160 |
After analyzing 160 verified reviews, Opera users most value its , while Preno users highlight user-friendly interface, customer support, channel management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Opera |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Application
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Opera |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 80 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #32 15 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #46 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #39 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Opera |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #14 65 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #12 53 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #21 17 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #8 26 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Opera |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #27 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #25 13 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #20 3 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #13 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) for your hotel is essential for streamlining operations, enhancing guest experience, and increasing revenue. Opera by Opera and Preno by Preno are two prominent options, but they serve different needs and hotel segments. Opera, with zero recent reviews and a rating of 0/5, is a legacy system with limited recent user feedback, while Preno boasts a 4.73/5 rating from over 144 recent reviews, making it the clearer choice based on current hotelier experiences.
Both platforms aim to simplify hotel management, but their approaches and target markets differ significantly. Opera is traditionally used by large, complex hotel groups, whereas Preno caters primarily to small to midsize hotels, boutique properties, and independent operators. Do these differences influence your decision?
Opera by Opera has a long history as a comprehensive, enterprise-level PMS designed for large hotel chains and properties with complex needs. Its core strengths lie in managing reservations, front desk tasks, and housekeeping, but it lacks recent updates or user feedback, making it difficult to assess its current usability or support quality.
Preno, in contrast, is a cloud-based system built specifically for hoteliers seeking simplicity and ease of use. With over 144 reviews in the last six months, Preno's user feedback is current and positive, emphasizing its intuitive interface, reliable support, and valuable features. Does your hotel need a solution that adapts quickly to modern demands?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, user-friendly PMS that integrates well with other tools and provides ongoing support, Preno is the better fit. Its robust review count and recent user satisfaction ratings indicate it is actively meeting hotelier needs for efficiency and ease of operation.
If your hotel requires a highly customizable, large-scale system with extensive integration options, Opera might be suitable—though its outdated reviews suggest your team should carefully evaluate whether it still meets modern standards. For most small to midsize hotels, Preno's current feature set and support offerings outweigh Opera’s legacy presence.
Preno earns a 4.78/5 ease-of-use rating based on recent reviews, with users highlighting its intuitive, web-based interface, and straightforward onboarding. Support staff are praised for their responsiveness, often assisting with onboarding and troubleshooting.
Opera, with a 0/5 rating and no recent reviews, provides no recent data on usability or support, leaving its ease of use highly uncertain. Given Preno’s recent user feedback and high satisfaction scores, it clearly offers a superior user experience. Edge: Preno.
Preno outshines Opera significantly, offering 30 unique features including integrated channel management, real-time reporting, automated night audits, guest CRM, and a native booking engine. Its mobile app and ancillary revenue tracking are additional advantages.
Opera appears to have no listed features or recent updates, which raises concerns about its current capabilities. Given Preno’s extensive feature set and ongoing upgrades, it is the clear choice for hoteliers seeking a modern, feature-rich management system. Edge: Preno.
Preno’s support receives high praise, with a 4.8/5 rating and positive quotes emphasizing quick, helpful responses and ongoing assistance during onboarding. Its 144 recent reviews attest to consistent support quality.
Opera offers no recent reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to assess its current support quality. For hotel teams that prioritize reliable, prompt assistance, Preno’s support is a decisive advantage. Edge: Preno.
Preno integrates with 17 verified partners including Xero, SiteMinder, TrustYou, and Revinate, providing extensive options for accounting, channel management, and guest feedback. Opera’s lack of verified integrations or recent updates suggests minimal or outdated connectivity.
Preno’s active integrations facilitate seamless workflow automation, reducing manual effort and errors—a critical advantage for small to midsize hotels. Edge: Preno.
Preno is rated 4.73/5 by over 144 hotel reviews, with high marks from boutique hotels, motels, and resorts, especially in recent feedback. Its 9.53/5 NPS score indicates strong loyalty and satisfaction.
Opera’s review score remains at 0/5 with no recent feedback, reflecting little current customer satisfaction or engagement. Based on recent, verified hotel reviews, Preno is far better rated. Edge: Preno.
Opera’s pricing details are unavailable, and it likely involves custom enterprise contracts, typical for legacy systems. Preno charges a straightforward $800 monthly base fee, with no additional implementation or setup costs.
For budget-conscious hotels or those seeking transparent pricing, Preno’s flat-rate model offers clarity and predictability. Opera’s unclear pricing makes Preno the more accessible option. Edge: Preno.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, boutique, or values quick deployment and simple workflows. Opera’s lack of recent reviews suggests it may not be the best choice for modern, agile properties.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive customization or operates in a highly complex, enterprise environment. Larger hotel groups may find Preno’s feature set limiting.
Opera by Opera offers a broad, enterprise-level PMS designed for large hotel groups, but its lack of recent reviews and updates makes it less reliable today. Preno, with over 144 recent reviews, a 4.73/5 rating, and a comprehensive feature set, clearly appeals to small and midsize hotels looking for a modern, supported management platform.
If your hotel values simplicity, support, and integrated features, Preno is the safer, more proven choice. For large, complex operations requiring extensive customization, Opera could still be considered, but proceed cautiously given its outdated review status. Overall, Preno’s current market presence and positive feedback make it the better option for most hoteliers today.
According to HTR's product database, Opera and Preno share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Opera |
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 18 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during wee... The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during weekends or busy periods. Responsiveness and direct contact with support staff are valued highly.
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
Where hoteliers push back
Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better str... Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better strategic decision-making. Some users expressed a need for customized reporting features.
Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with... Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with offline functionality and more feature depth would improve usability, especially for managers on the go.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Opera and Preno share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Opera offers 0 verified integration partners, while Preno offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Preno leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Opera: No. Preno: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Opera has an HT Score of 0 and Preno has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor