The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 43 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
p3 Hotels shines , with exclusive features like Pre-stay emails and Post-stay emails.
Safara shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) .
Side-by-side ratings based on 43 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 16 | 27 |
After analyzing 43 verified reviews, p3 Hotels users most value its , while Safara users highlight seamless direct booking experience, flexibility and control, customization and branding. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Seamless Direct Booking Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Flexibility and Control
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and Branding
▾
|
|
|
+
Upselling and Promotions
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Room for Technical Integration
▾
|
|
|
−
Advanced Data Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Video Content Incorporation
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #36 3 reviews | #37 3 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #35 5 reviews | #34 6 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #20 6 reviews | #11 16 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #20 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #35 9 reviews | #21 22 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #36 4 reviews | #20 20 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #24 9 reviews | #36 3 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #31 3 reviews | #39 0 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #10 26 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #17 14 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | — | #33 1 reviews |
Choosing between p3 Booking Engine by p3 Hotels and Safara hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both platforms aim to increase direct bookings, but they differ significantly in features, market presence, and user feedback. Your team must consider what matters most: a highly customizable, proven platform with extensive integrations or a newer, more intuitive system with a strong focus on guest experience. Which solution aligns best with your strategic goals?
Safara’s higher overall rating, more recent reviews, and 24 total reviews give it a clear advantage. Its 5/5 customer support rating and 100% likelihood to recommend highlight a superior user experience. If recent user feedback is your priority, Safara is the stronger choice. But if you need a mature platform with a broader feature set, p3 Booking Engine remains compelling.
Both products serve as booking engines designed to boost direct reservations, but their approaches and maturity levels vary. p3 Hotels offers a highly customizable platform with 36 shared features and 8 unique functionalities, including multi-room bookings, gift vouchers, and integrations with major payment providers. Its focus on flexibility and seamless integration with OPERA PMS makes it ideal for hotels that need tailored solutions and robust control.
Safara, launched in 2022, provides a streamlined, guest-focused booking experience supported by a modern design. Although it has fewer features—none exclusive—it excels in user-friendliness, with a high ease-of-use rating (4.92/5) and a strong emphasis on increasing conversions. It’s suitable for hotels prioritizing guest experience and rapid deployment over extensive customization.
Where do your priorities lie? If you seek a mature, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations, p3 Hotels is the safer bet. If you prefer a newer, highly rated system that emphasizes simplicity and guest satisfaction, Safara should be your focus.
If your hotel needs a proven, flexible booking engine capable of supporting complex operations, go with p3 Hotels. Its long-standing presence, 16 reviews, and 4.67/5 rating reflect a mature product appreciated for its customization and integration options, especially with OPERA PMS.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, quick setup, and high guest satisfaction, Safara is the better choice. With 24 reviews and a perfect 5/5 customer support rating, it appeals to hotels seeking intuitive interfaces and a modern experience. Its strengths in seamless design and guest engagement make it ideal for hotels aiming for rapid results.
In summary, choose p3 Hotels if you need deep customization and comprehensive features; pick Safara if you want a modern, guest-centric platform with proven satisfaction.
p3 Hotels scores 4.5/5 for ease of use, reflecting a user-friendly back-office interface and straightforward integrations. Its onboarding process, rated 4.79/5, demonstrates a smooth setup, but some users mention the learning curve for advanced features.
Safara surpasses with a 4.92/5 ease of use rating, indicating an exceptionally intuitive platform. Its onboarding is similarly rated at 4.83/5, and reviews highlight how quickly staff adapt to its simple, modern design.
Edge: Safara.
p3 Hotels boasts 36 shared features plus 8 exclusive capabilities, including multi-room bookings, gift vouchers, and integrations with Stripe, PayPal, and other payment providers. Its unique features support complex booking scenarios and loyalty tools, offering more control and flexibility.
Safara, with no exclusive features, emphasizes core booking functionalities and user experience. While it excels in seamless booking and non-room reservations, it lacks the extensive feature set of p3 Hotels.
Edge: p3 Hotels.
p3 Hotels has a strong support rating of 4.59/5, with reviews praising staff availability and responsiveness. Clients mention their excellent relationship management and proactive communication, though some desire faster feature development.
Safara leads with a perfect 5/5 support rating, backed by recent reviews praising responsiveness and proactive engagement. Customers highlight how support staff are always receptive to feedback and quick to resolve issues.
Edge: Safara.
p3 Hotels offers 13 verified partners, including key integrations with OPERA PMS, Triptease, and Cendyn, providing extensive options for hotel tech stacks. Its broader integration network supports complex operational needs and third-party tools.
Safara has 6 verified partners, including Triptease and The Hotels Network, but has fewer integrations overall. Its focus remains on core booking functions rather than deep tech stack connectivity.
Edge: p3 Hotels.
Safara’s recent reviews and 24 total reviews give it a clear edge, with 100% likelihood to recommend and a 9.96/10 NPS score. Hotels in boutique and city-center segments especially praise its ease of use and responsiveness.
p3 Hotels, despite a high overall rating of 4.67/5 from 16 reviews, has fewer recent ratings and slightly lower NPS. It tends to appeal more to larger hotels or brands with complex needs.
Edge: Safara.
p3 Hotels charges a base fee of $500 per month, with no implementation or setup fees. The platform does not offer a freemium model or tiered pricing, making cost straightforward for hotels with predictable budgets.
Safara’s pricing starts at $800 per month, also without additional setup fees. Its higher price point reflects its newer, simplified platform and focus on guest experience, but may be a barrier for smaller hotels.
Not ideal if you prefer a simple, quick-to-deploy platform or have a tight budget.
Not ideal if your hotel needs complex customization or extensive integrations.
p3 Hotels is a mature, feature-packed booking engine with broad integrations and a strong reputation among larger hotels and brands. Its strength lies in customization, deep operational integration, and comprehensive tools designed for complex hotel operations.
Safara, on the other hand, offers a newer, guest-centric platform with a simple interface, rapid onboarding, and excellent support. It excels in delivering a seamless booking experience and high guest satisfaction, making it ideal for boutique hotels and independent properties.
If your hotel values flexibility, extensive features, and proven stability, p3 Hotels is the safer choice. But if ease of use, recent positive reviews, and guest experience are your priorities, Safara is the better option.
Note: Based on recent reviews and higher review counts, Safara's stronger user satisfaction and support ratings make it the preferred platform for most hoteliers seeking a modern, guest-focused booking engine.
According to HTR's product database, p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels) and Safara share 36 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Multi-room bookings | ||
| Paypal | ||
| Post-stay emails | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Tripadvisor Bookings |
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Safara's booking engine provides a seamless and intuitive booking experience, significantly boosting conversion rates and simplifying the process for... Safara's booking engine provides a seamless and intuitive booking experience, significantly boosting conversion rates and simplifying the process for guests, which in turn enhances revenue by capturing more direct bookings.
Some reviewers highlight the need for more flexibility in setting special rates or promotions, which could enhance revenue management strategies.
Users appreciate Safara's ability to maintain a hotel's unique brand identity throughout the booking process. However, they desire further customizati... Users appreciate Safara's ability to maintain a hotel's unique brand identity throughout the booking process. However, they desire further customization options for branding and layout to enhance the user experience and match their evolving brand needs.
Where hoteliers push back
The platform integrates well with existing systems, although some users note a need for further integrations, such as with CMS, PMS, and additional te... The platform integrates well with existing systems, although some users note a need for further integrations, such as with CMS, PMS, and additional tech stack solutions to enhance overall usage.
While Safara offers some reporting capabilities, users express a desire for more robust and detailed analytics to better understand guest behavior and... While Safara offers some reporting capabilities, users express a desire for more robust and detailed analytics to better understand guest behavior and optimize pricing and marketing strategies.
Ranks higher for
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels) and Safara share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels) offers 13 verified integration partners, while Safara offers 6. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Safara leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels): No. Safara: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. p3 Hotels has an HT Score of 0 and Safara has 77. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor