The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 328 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Clock shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
Passepartout shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 328 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 328 | 0 |
After analyzing 328 verified reviews, Clock users most value its feature richness, operational efficiency, responsive support and regular updates, while Passepartout users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Feature Richness
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Responsive Support and Regular Updates
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use for Training
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Error Messages
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting Feature
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #11 117 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #7 157 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #17 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #11 5 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 165 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #11 80 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #8 62 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #9 27 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 30 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 228 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #11 13 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #17 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Clock PMS and Passepartout hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but Clock PMS offers a broader, feature-rich platform explicitly designed for hotels, whereas Passepartout primarily targets property managers and landlords, with limited hotel-specific capabilities. Your choice depends on whether you prioritize hotel-focused features and industry experience or a flexible, property management tool.
Clock PMS boasts a substantial user base, recent reviews, and extensive features tailored to hospitality operations, making it a more proven solution for hotels. Passepartout, with no recent reviews or verified customer feedback, remains a less tested option for the hospitality sector. Would your hotel benefit more from a dedicated hotel PMS or a versatile property management system?
Clock PMS and Passepartout both aim to simplify property management, but their core audiences and functionalities diverge significantly. Clock PMS is designed specifically for hotels, offering features like channel management, booking engine, guest messaging, housekeeping, and integrated revenue management—tailored to hospitality needs. Passepartout, on the other hand, is more suited for property managers, landlords, or smaller portfolios, with a focus on general property management and tenant communication.
Clock PMS’s high ratings (4.8/5 overall, 251 reviews, recent 6 reviews) reinforce its standing as a trusted hotel management platform used across multiple regions, including North America, Europe, and Asia. Passepartout, lacking any recent reviews or verified user feedback, appears to be less established in the hotel industry and more oriented toward property portfolios outside of hospitality.
If your hotel requires a comprehensive, hotel-specific PMS with proven performance and ongoing support, Clock is the more suitable choice. Are you seeking a solution with a strong industry reputation and active user community?
If your hotel needs an all-in-one management platform with reservations, rates, invoicing, guest messaging, front desk, and channel management, go with Clock PMS. Its extensive feature set and proven track record make it ideal for mid-sized to large hotels looking to streamline operations and improve guest experiences.
If your property management involves fewer hospitality-specific tasks, or if you manage rental portfolios and need tools for tenant communication and property oversight, Passepartout might be more appropriate. However, given the lack of recent reviews and verified customer feedback, Clock PMS remains the more reliable choice for hotels.
For hoteliers aiming to grow or optimize their operations with robust integrations and dedicated hospitality features, Clock PMS is the clear recommendation.
Clock PMS’s ease of use is reflected in its 4.78/5 UI rating, onboarding score of 4.71/5, and 251 reviews, many citing its intuitive interface and simple staff training. Users frequently highlight how the platform streamlines daily tasks and improves operational flow, even in busy environments. Clock’s mobile app, online check-in, and guest messaging features further enhance usability.
Passepartout, with no recent reviews or detailed user feedback, provides no current data on usability or onboarding. Its interface and user experience remain unverified in the hotel context.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS offers 58 unique features, including payment processing, booking engine, channel management, revenue management, guest profiles, housekeepings, integrated CRS, digital registration, and automated reminders. Its extensive integration options include verified partners like Curacity, Hotel Investor Apps, and Profitroom, enabling comprehensive customization.
Passepartout, with no documented features or recent reviews, appears to lack the depth and specialization found in Clock PMS. The absence of detailed feature data suggests it may not meet the complex demands of modern hotels.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS’s support and onboarding are highly rated, both at 4.75/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and proactive assistance. Users describe Clock’s support as quick, helpful, and able to resolve issues efficiently—key for hotels needing reliable help during critical operations.
Passepartout offers no recent support ratings or customer feedback, leaving its support quality unverified. The lack of public reviews diminishes confidence in its ability to assist hotels effectively.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS boasts 111 verified integration partners, including popular solutions like Curacity, Profitroom, and Bookboost, allowing hotels to customize and expand their systems. Its open API and no hidden connection fees foster seamless third-party integrations.
Passepartout, with zero verified integrations, limits its adaptability and may require manual processes or additional tools for extended functionality. For hotels seeking extensive connectivity, Clock has a clear advantage.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS’s recent reviews—totaling 251, with 6 in the last 6 months—show an overall rating of 4.8/5 and a likelihood-to-recommend score of 95%. Users, particularly in independent hotels and boutique properties, praise its comprehensive features, ease of use, and support.
Passepartout, lacking recent verified reviews or ratings, cannot be reliably compared. Based on current data, Clock is the preferred choice for hoteliers valuing user feedback and proven performance.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS costs a flat $600 monthly fee, with no implementation fees or trial options. Its pricing model is transparent, with no hidden charges for features or integrations.
Passepartout’s pricing details are unavailable, which complicates comparison. Its lack of transparent pricing likely indicates a less flexible or less established structure, favoring Clock’s straightforward model.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, with minimal operational complexity, or primarily focused on rental management outside hospitality.
Not ideal if your hotel requires hospitality-specific features like booking engines, channel management, or guest engagement tools, especially without recent reviews or proven hotel support.
Clock PMS is a comprehensive, hotel-first property management system proven to boost operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Its extensive feature set, large user base, and recent reviews make it a safe, reliable choice for hotels seeking a proven solution.
Passepartout lacks recent reviews, verified customer feedback, and documented hotel-specific features, making it a less certain option for hoteliers. Its focus seems more aligned with property portfolios outside of hospitality, which limits its suitability for hotel operations.
If your hotel prioritizes industry experience, proven performance, and full-featured management, Clock PMS stands out as the clear winner. Conversely, Passepartout may suit smaller property portfolios or landlords but lacks the recent validation to recommend confidently for hotel use.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Passepartout | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Clock PMS and Passepartout share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 46 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 6 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of feat... Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of features overwhelming and suggest improved organization.
The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contribut... The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contributing to a smoother experience for both staff and guests.
Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliabilit... Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliability and relevance to user needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the erro... Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the error message to the problem would improve user experience.
While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful... While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful capabilities.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Clock PMS and Passepartout share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Clock PMS offers 111 verified integration partners, while Passepartout offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Clock PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Clock PMS: No. Passepartout: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Clock has an HT Score of 84 and Passepartout has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor